Case law

Moore v. . State

200 N.C. 300 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 27, 1931

Rawlings v. Neal, 122 N. C., 173 ; Binford v. Alston, 15 N. C., 351 . … Brown v. Appleby, 139 Wis., 195 , 120 N. W., 861 ; McCumber v. Waukesha Co., 91 Wis., 442 , 65 N. W., 51 ; 3 Cyc., 877; 2 Ruling Case Law, p. 491, par. 52.

Burnet v. Commissioners of Bladen County

184 N.C. 274 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1922

the board of education of said county into one township high school district. … Board of Education v. Comrs., 183 N. C., 300 . Barring certain exceptions, tbe general rule Is that the Legislature may validate retrospectively any proceeding which it might have authorized in advance. Anderson v.

Hargrave v. . Commissioners

168 N.C. 626 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 14, 1915

BROWN, J., dissenting. … In Comrs. v.

Wingler v. . Miller

223 N.C. 15 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1943

E., 233 ; Brown v. B. R., 195 N. C., 699 , 143 S. E., 536 ; Robinson v. Ivey, 193 N. C., 805 , 138 S. E., 173 . Tbe third exception is to tbe evidence of Dr. … Bank v. Snow, 221 N. C., 14 , 18 S. E. (2d), 711 ; S. v. Gibson, ibid., 252; Brown v. Ward, ibid., 344. Assignments of error numbers 9, 10, 12 and 29 are based on numerous exceptions to tbe testimony of Mrs.

State v. . Little

175 N.C. 743 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 22, 1917

Cases, 408; Cartwright's case , 114 Mass. 230 ; S. v. Steube , 3 Ohio C.C. 383 ; In re Healy , 53 Vt. 694 ; People v. Wilson , 64 Ill. 195 ; Ex parte McLeod , 120 F. 130 ; U.S. v. Anonymous , 21 F. 761 ; U.S. v. … Wilmot , in King v.

Schenkel & Shultz, Inc. v. Hermon F. Fox & Associates

362 N.C. 269 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 2008

Background On 24 November 1998, the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (Board) contracted with the architectural firm of Schenkel & Shultz, Inc. … Farmers Bank v. Michael T. Brown Distribs., Inc., 307 N.C. 342, 347-48 , 298 S.E.2d 357, 360 (1983).

Wolfenden v. . Commissioners

152 N.C. 83 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 9, 1910

V, of the Constitution. … Peterson v. Bank , 8 Kan. App. 508 ; Sumner v. Colfax Co. , 14 Neb. 524 ; Wiley v. Flournoy , 30 Ark. 609 ; Yocum v. Bank , 144 Ind. 272 ; Phillips v. New Buffalo , 64 Mich. 683 ; Auditor v.

Walker v. N.C. State Bd. of Dental Exam'rs

793 S.E.2d 220 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 2016

Williams v. . Bradford

158 N.C. 36 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1911

BROWN, J., dissenting. … Smith v. School Trustees , 141 N.C. pp. 143-159 ; Lowery v. School Trustees , 140 N.C. 33 ; Puitt v. Commissioners , 94 N.C. 709 ; (40) Riggsbee v. Durham , 94 N.C. 800 .

Steelman v. City of New Bern

279 N.C. 589 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 10, 1971

Pitts, 244 Ark. 1239 , 429 S.W. 2d 45 (1968); Brown v. City of Omaha, 183 Neb. 430 , 160 N.W. 2d 805 (1968); Tucker v. City of Okolona, 227 So. 2d 475 (Miss. 1969); Becker v. Beaudoin, 261 A. 2d 896 (R.I. 1970). … G.S. 153-9 (44) (Board of County Commissioners) ; G.S. 115-53 (City and County Boards of Education) ; G.S. 115A-17 (Boards of Trustees of Community Colleges) ; G.S. 143-291 *595 allowed agencies and departments of the State

Walker v. N.C. State Bd. of Dental Exam'rs

792 S.E.2d 804 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 15, 2016

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th of September 2016 by the North Carolina Board of Pharmacy for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief: "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this

Lenoir v. . Crabtree

158 N.C. 358 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1912

In the recent case of Shelby v. … Ward v. Willis , 51 N.C. 183 ; Land Co. v. Hotel , 132 N.C. 522 ; S. v. Twiford , 136 N.C. 609 .

State v. . Gouge

157 N.C. 602 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 1911

BROWN, J. dissenting; ALLEN, J., concurring in dissenting opinion. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CLARK. … S. v. Bullard , 100 N.C. 486 . But this the State did not attempt to do.

Walker v. N.C. State Bd. of Dental Exam'rs

787 S.E.2d 396 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 13, 2016

Lenoir County v. Crabtree

158 N.C. 357 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1912

C., 196 , Brown, J., says: “It is well settled that unless by legislative enactment no title can be acquired against the public by user alone, nor loss to the public by nonuser.” Commonwealth v. Morehead, 4 Am. … Ward v. Willis, 51 N. C., 183 ; Land Co. v. Hotel, 132 N. C., 522 ; S. v. Twiford, 136 N. C., 609 .

State v. Haywood

295 N.C. 709 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 28, 1978

State v. Goines, 273 N.C. 509 , 160 S.E. 2d 469 (1968). It is immediately apparent from an examination of the facts that the court properly overruled the motion as to defendants Watkins and Brown. … Edwards, 396 Mich. 551 , 242 N.W. 2d 739 (1976); People v. Brown, 26 N.Y. 2d 88 , 308 N.Y.S. 2d 825 , 257 N.E. 2d 16 , 43 A.L.R. 3d 1407 (1970); Howard v. Jessup, 519 P. 2d 913 (Okla. 1973); Hines v.

Noble v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.

151 N.C. 76 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 29, 1909

Tanner v. Lumber Co., 140 N. C., 475 , and cases cited; Shaw v. Mfg. Co., 146 N. C., 236 ; Avery v. Lumber Co., 146 N. C., 592 . … Tanner v. Lumber Co., supra.

Sherrod v. . Dawson

154 N.C. 525 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1911

Brown, J. The facts as presented by the record are that certain notes and mortgages, solvent credits, are in the hands of J. P. Bunn, an attorney of Rocky' Mount, N. C. … Range Co. v. Carver, 118 N. C., 331 ; Armstrong v. Stedman, 130 N. C., 217 ; Brinkley v. Smith, 130 N.

Citizens Lumber Co. v. Elias

199 N.C. 103 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1930

Supply Co. v. Machin, 150 N. C., 738 , 64 S. E., 887 . In Morris v. Basnight, 179 N. C., 298 , 102 S. … Bank v. Oil Mill, 157 N. C., 302 , 73 S. E., 93 ; Clowe v. Imperial Pine Products Co., 114 N. C., 304 , 19 S. E., 153 .” Again in Watson v. Mfg. Co., 147 N. C., 469 , 61 S.

State v. . Trull

169 N.C. 363 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 5, 1915

When there is merely matter of suspicion it is purely in the discretion of the presiding judge, citing Moore v. Edmiston , 70 N.C. 481 ; S. v. Brittain supra; Baker v. Brown , 151 N.C. 17 , and S. v. Tilghman, supra . … In Baker v. Brown this proposition is fully discussed and sustained by Walker, J . In S. v.