Case law

King v. . Blackwell

96 N.C. 322 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1887

The statute (The Code, §2014,) invests the board of county commissioners in each county of the State, with full power and authority “to appoint and settle ferries; to order the laying out of public roads when necessary; to … Brown v. Calloway, 90 N. C., 118 ; Terry v. Railroad, 91 N. C., 236 ; Fry v. Currie, Ibid., 436; Davis v. Council, 92 N. C., 725 ; Branton v. O’Briant, 93 N. C., 99 .

C. C. Mangum, Inc. v. Gasperson

262 N.C. 32 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1964

A red flag, “10 to 12 inches by 7 or 8 inches,” was attached to the end of the clip-board by a piece of wire. Dampier testified: “When you waved the board, the flag would flop back and forth. … In Equipment Co. v. Hertz Corp. and Contractors, Inc. v.

State Ex Rel. Wooten v. White

125 N.C. 403 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1899

Neither the relator nor his agent, Brown, knew of that arrangement. … When a sheriff receives the tax list, with the proper order for collection endorsed thereon by the clerk of the Board of Commissioners, the same is in the nature of an execution.

In Re the Appeal of Asheville Citizen-Times Publishing Co.

281 N.C. 210 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 1972

Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419 , 6 L.ed. 678; Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Bowers, and U. S. Plywood Corporation v. City of Algoma, 358 U.S. 534 , 3 L.ed. 2d 490, 79 S.Ct. 383 . In Brown v. … The court held that the “original package” concept as applied to goods imported for the purpose of sale in the case of Brown v.

Alexander v. . Commissioners

70 N.C. 208 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1874

V. That the Board of Commissioners, holding office from 1868 to 1870, refused to levy any tax to meet the interest on said bonds. … As to the bonds signed by Brown, before the abolition of the County Courts, it may be observed, so as to put the case squarely on the validity of the latter class, i. e. , the $37,500 signed by Brown and countersigned by

Moore v. Bd. of Elections of Henderson Cnty.

803 S.E.2d 164 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 28, 2017

NC State Bd. of Educ. v. State

804 S.E.2d 740 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 16, 2017

Cameron v. Cameron

235 N.C. 82 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 1952

Seawell v. Purvis, 232 N.C. 194 , 59 S.E. 2d *85 572; Taylor v. Schaub, 225 N.C. 134 , 33 S.E. 2d 658 ; Moore v. Moore, 224 N.C. 552 , 31 S.E. 2d 690 ; Brown v. Polk, 201 N.C. 375 , 160 S.E. 357 ; Bank v. … It is well settled that in an action for divorce, either absolute or from bed and board, it is permissible for the defendant to set up a cause of action for divorce, either absolute or from bed and board, as a counterclaim

Mason v. . Durham

175 N.C. 639 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1918

WALKER, J., dissenting, BROWN, J., concurring in the dissenting opinion. This is an action by Mary B. … This was so held as to railroads in Caveness v. R. R. , 172 N.C. 305 ; Bennett v. R. R. , 170 N.C. 389 ; Porter v. R. R. , 148 N.C. 563 ; Beasley v. R. R. , 145 N.C. 272 . As to telegraph companies in Phillips v. R.

Moore v. . State

200 N.C. 300 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 27, 1931

Rawlings v. Neal, 122 N. C., 173 ; Binford v. Alston, 15 N. C., 351 . … Brown v. Appleby, 139 Wis., 195 , 120 N. W., 861 ; McCumber v. Waukesha Co., 91 Wis., 442 , 65 N. W., 51 ; 3 Cyc., 877; 2 Ruling Case Law, p. 491, par. 52.

State v. Murvin

304 N.C. 523 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1981

Albertson saw defendant go through the boarding gate. She testified that he was leaving North Carolina so he wouldn’t get caught. … Defendant, relying on State v.

State Ex Rel. Greene v. Owen

125 N.C. 212 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1899

Hunter , 65 N.C. 603 ; Clark v. Stanly , 66 N.C. 59 ; Brown v. Turner , 70 N.C. 93 ; Bunting v. Gales , 77 N.C. 382 ; Vann v. Pipkin , 77 N.C. 408 ; Prairie v. Worth , 78 N.C. 169 ; Lyon v. … Aiken , 78 N.C. 258 ; McNamee v. Alexander , 109 N.C. 246 ; State v. Cutshall; 110 N.C. 545 ; Board of Education v. Kenan , 112 N.C. 568 ; State v. Womble , 112 N.C. 867 ; Trotter v.

Cordell v. Grove Stone and Sand Company

247 N.C. 688 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1958

Tuttle v. Building Corp., supra; Brimmer *692 v. Brimmer, 174 N.C. 435 , 93 S.E. 984 ; Watson v. Manufacturing Co., 147 N.C. 469 , 61 S.E. 273 . In R. R. v. … Johnson v. Ins. Co., 172 N.C. 142 , citing Smith v. R. R., 68 N.C. 115 ; Rumbough v. Improvement Co., 112 N.C. 751 ; Morgan v. Benefit Society, 167 N.C. 265 .” In the case of Smith v. R.

Dowdy v. . Dowdy

154 N.C. 556 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 5, 1911

Brown, I. The record states that the court declined judgment for plaintiff upon the ground that the plaintiff was not entitled thereto upon the findings to the issues. … Martin v. Martin, 130 N. C., 28 ; O’Connor v. O’Connor, 109 N. C., 139 ; Jackson v. Jackson, 105 N. C., 433 ; White v. White, 84 N. C., 340 .

Doggett v. South Atlantic Warehouse Co.

212 N.C. 599 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1937

Cast Iron Pipe and Foundry Co. v. Hartley, 217 Ala., 462 , 116 Sou., 666 (burns cause of nephritis); United Paper Board Co. v. Lewis, 65 Ind. Ap., 356, 117 N. … Brown v. Ice Co., 203 N. C., 97 (100).

State v. Ballenger

247 N.C. 216 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1957

In S. v. Brown, 159 N.C. 467 , 74 S.E. 580 , the defendant was charged in the Municipal Court of the City of Greensboro with the common law offense of keeping a disorderly house, and was convicted. … See In re Barnes, 212 N.C. 735 , 194 S.E. 499 , S. v. Norman, 237 N.C. 205 , 74 S.E. 2d 602 ; S. v. Sloan, 238 N.C. 547 , 78 S.E. 2d 312 . The questions raised in S. v. Baskerville, supra and S. v.

Comrs. v. . Comrs.

184 N.C. 463 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 6, 1922

As said in Brown v. Turner , 70 N.C. 93 , quoted with approval in Board of Education v. … State ex rel Collector v. Dishaw , 42 N. J., 141 ; People ex rel Dannat v. *Page 468 Comptroller , 77 N.Y. 45 ; People ex rel Dowing v. Stout , 23 N.Y. 338 ; Lansing v. Van Gorder , 24 Mich. 456 ; County Comrs.

Ragland v. Nash-Rocky Mount Bd. of Educ.

793 S.E.2d 237 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 2016

Walker v. N.C. State Bd. of Dental Exam'rs

792 S.E.2d 804 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 15, 2016

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th of September 2016 by the North Carolina Board of Pharmacy for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief: "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this

Hardy v. . Comrs. of Warren

208 N.C. 699 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1935

This case is practically the same as Newman et al. v. Watkins et al., Board of County Commissioners, and Royster et al., Board of Elections of Vance County, ante , 675, and is affirmed for the reasons therein stated.