Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

1.05s

  • State v. Martin

    309 N.C. 465 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1983

    State v. Barfield, 298 N.C. 306 , 259 S.E. 2d 510 (1979); State v. Greene, 294 N.C. 418 , 241 S.E. 2d 662 (1978). … Tyndall v. Harvey C. Hines, Co., 226 N.C. 620 , 39 S.E. 2d 828 (1946); State v. Dills, 204 N.C. 33 , 167 S.E. 459 (1933). The defendant in State v. Harrelson, 54 N.C.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • State Board of Charities & Public Welfare v. Highland Hospital, Inc.

    196 N.C. 752 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1929

    Cement Co. v. Phillips, 182 N. C., 437 , 109 S. E., 257 . Appeal dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ellison v. Aldermen of Raleigh

    89 N.C. 125 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1883

    King v. Lynn, Douglas, 85. … The doubt intimated is resolved in the subsequent case of Brown v. Turner, 70 N.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Foil v. Board of Drainage Comrs. of Big Cold Water Drainage District No. 1

    192 N.C. 652 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 1926

    Drain *655 age Comrs. v. Sparks, 179 N. C., 581 ; Pate v. Banks, 178 N. C., 139 ; Taylor v. Drainage Comrs., 176 N. C., 224 . C. … Helme v. Guy, 6 N. C., 342 . An “appurtenance” has been defined as “a thing which belongs to another thing as principal, and which passes as incident to the principal thing.”

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Hood Ex Rel. Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of Financial Control

    203 N.C. 119 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 29, 1932

    In Morgan v. Bank, 190 N. C., 209 , 129 S. … Trust Co. v. Rose, 192 N. C., 673 , 135 S. E., 795 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Baker v. N.C. Psychology Bd.

    827 S.E.2d 102 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 9, 2019

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jamison v. City of Charlotte

    239 N.C. 682 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 24, 1954

    In Board of Education v. … Pure Oil Co. v. State, 244 Ala. 258 , 12 So. 2d 861 , 148 A.L.R. 260 ; Fox v. *694 Board for Louisville & Jefferson County Children’s Home, 244 Ky. 1 , 50 S.W. 2d 67 ; C. F. Smith Co. v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • In Re Applications for Reassignment Boyd

    247 N.C. 413 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 10, 1958

    This policy of separation for educational purposes had been accepted as constitutional since the decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 , 41 L.Ed. 256 . The decision in the Segregation Cases (Brown v. … Gibson v. Board of Public Instruction of Dade County, 246 F. 2d 913 ; School Board of City of Newport News, Va. v. Atkins, 246 F. 2d 325 ; School Board of Charlottesville, Va. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Barrier v. Randolph

    260 N.C. 741 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1963

    Lackey v. Board of Education, 258 N.C. 460, 462 , 128 S.E. 2d 806 , amid cases cited; Rouse v. Strickland, 260 N.C. 491, 495 , 133 S.E. 2d 151 , and cases cited. Tire sufficiency of the Randolph. … Board of Education, supra, this Court, -in- -opinion by Denny, C.J., while recognizing and -restating (the rule -applied in Ox-endine v. Lewis, supra, held it did not apply to- the -deed then under -consideration.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • HOKE COUNTY v. State

    601 S.E.2d 199 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 30, 2004

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. . Wagner

    219 N.C. 235 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1941

    Brown , 29 Ill. 201 , as follows: "From very necessity a power must exist somewhere in the community to grant relief in such cases of absolute necessity, and under our system of jurisprudence, that power is vested in the … the powers conferred upon said board as herein defined.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Board of School Directors of Forsyth Co. v. Commissioners of Forsyth Co.

    127 N.C. 263 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 1900

    These facts are admitted, or not denied, by the defendants, and upon this state of facts his Honor made the following order: “It is ordered and adjudged that ■defendant Board of Commissioners of Forsyth County be restrained … The only case called to -our attention as authority in this case, was Board of Education of Bladen County v. Commissioners of Bladen, 113 N.C., 379 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moody v. State Prison.

    53 L.R.A. 855 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 12, 1901

    County Board v. State Board , 106 N.C. 81 . The statute incorporating the defendant (Laws 1899, ch. 24), does not contain the authority "to sue and be sued." … Lorillard v. Monroe , 11 N. Y., 392 ; Brown v. People , 75 N.Y. 441 .

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Penland v. Town of Bryson City

    199 N.C. 140 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1930

    "We cite below certain decisions of this Court in regard to material and immaterial changes: In Brown v. Commissioners, 173 N. … Glenn v. Wray, 126 N. C., 730 ; Brown v. Stewart, 134 N. C., 357 .” In Claywell v. Commissioners, 173 N.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Burgin v. . Smith

    151 N.C. 561 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1909

    Harris v. Wright , 121, N.C. 171; McCormac v. Comrs. , 90 N.C. 441 ; Tate v. Comrs. , 122 N.C. 812 . In Jones v. … In Broadnax v. Groom , 64 N.C. 244 ; Cromartie v. Comrs. , 87 N.C. 134 ; Ward v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Booher v. Frue

    321 N.C. 590 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1988

    Cited 6 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Cameron v. Cameron

    235 N.C. 82 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 1952

    Seawell v. Purvis, 232 N.C. 194 , 59 S.E. 2d *85 572; Taylor v. Schaub, 225 N.C. 134 , 33 S.E. 2d 658 ; Moore v. Moore, 224 N.C. 552 , 31 S.E. 2d 690 ; Brown v. Polk, 201 N.C. 375 , 160 S.E. 357 ; Bank v. … It is well settled that in an action for divorce, either absolute or from bed and board, it is permissible for the defendant to set up a cause of action for divorce, either absolute or from bed and board, as a counterclaim

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Harris v. Davenport.

    132 N.C. 697 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 26, 1903

    Straus v. Beardsley, 79 N. C., 59 ; Dalton v. Webster, 82 N. C., 279 . … Collingood v. Brown, 106 N. C., 362 ; Arrinqton v. Arrington, 114 N. C., 151 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Street v. . Hildebrand

    205 N.C. 208 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1933

    Brown in reimbursement of the amount of the tax, penalty, interest and costs." From this judgment, plaintiff and the defendant, Wiley B. Brown, appealed to the Supreme Court. … Guy v. Harmon , 204 N.C. 226 , 167 S.E. 796 ; Orange Co. v. Wilson , 202 N.C. 424 , 163 S.E. 113 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Morris v. . R. R.

    197 N.C. 788 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 11, 1929

    The evidence of defendant tended to show that the plaintiff was attempting to board a moving train, missed his footing, and fell under the train. … Hoggard v. R. R. , 194 N.C. 256 , 139 S.E. 372 ; Brown v. R. R. , 195 N.C. 699 , 140 S.E. 622 . Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.