Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.05s
309 N.C. 465 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1983
State v. Barfield, 298 N.C. 306 , 259 S.E. 2d 510 (1979); State v. Greene, 294 N.C. 418 , 241 S.E. 2d 662 (1978). … Tyndall v. Harvey C. Hines, Co., 226 N.C. 620 , 39 S.E. 2d 828 (1946); State v. Dills, 204 N.C. 33 , 167 S.E. 459 (1933). The defendant in State v. Harrelson, 54 N.C.
Cited 39 timesPublishedState Board of Charities & Public Welfare v. Highland Hospital, Inc.
196 N.C. 752 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1929
Cement Co. v. Phillips, 182 N. C., 437 , 109 S. E., 257 . Appeal dismissed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEllison v. Aldermen of Raleigh
89 N.C. 125 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1883
King v. Lynn, Douglas, 85. … The doubt intimated is resolved in the subsequent case of Brown v. Turner, 70 N.
Cited 21 timesPublishedFoil v. Board of Drainage Comrs. of Big Cold Water Drainage District No. 1
192 N.C. 652 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 1926
Drain *655 age Comrs. v. Sparks, 179 N. C., 581 ; Pate v. Banks, 178 N. C., 139 ; Taylor v. Drainage Comrs., 176 N. C., 224 . C. … Helme v. Guy, 6 N. C., 342 . An “appurtenance” has been defined as “a thing which belongs to another thing as principal, and which passes as incident to the principal thing.”
Cited 6 timesPublishedHood Ex Rel. Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of Financial Control
203 N.C. 119 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 29, 1932
In Morgan v. Bank, 190 N. C., 209 , 129 S. … Trust Co. v. Rose, 192 N. C., 673 , 135 S. E., 795 .
Cited 0 timesPublished827 S.E.2d 102 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 9, 2019
Cited 0 timesPublished239 N.C. 682 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 24, 1954
In Board of Education v. … Pure Oil Co. v. State, 244 Ala. 258 , 12 So. 2d 861 , 148 A.L.R. 260 ; Fox v. *694 Board for Louisville & Jefferson County Children’s Home, 244 Ky. 1 , 50 S.W. 2d 67 ; C. F. Smith Co. v.
Cited 26 timesPublishedIn Re Applications for Reassignment Boyd
247 N.C. 413 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 10, 1958
This policy of separation for educational purposes had been accepted as constitutional since the decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 , 41 L.Ed. 256 . The decision in the Segregation Cases (Brown v. … Gibson v. Board of Public Instruction of Dade County, 246 F. 2d 913 ; School Board of City of Newport News, Va. v. Atkins, 246 F. 2d 325 ; School Board of Charlottesville, Va. v.
Cited 10 timesPublished260 N.C. 741 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1963
Lackey v. Board of Education, 258 N.C. 460, 462 , 128 S.E. 2d 806 , amid cases cited; Rouse v. Strickland, 260 N.C. 491, 495 , 133 S.E. 2d 151 , and cases cited. Tire sufficiency of the Randolph. … Board of Education, supra, this Court, -in- -opinion by Denny, C.J., while recognizing and -restating (the rule -applied in Ox-endine v. Lewis, supra, held it did not apply to- the -deed then under -consideration.
Cited 7 timesPublished601 S.E.2d 199 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 30, 2004
Cited 0 timesPublished219 N.C. 235 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1941
Brown , 29 Ill. 201 , as follows: "From very necessity a power must exist somewhere in the community to grant relief in such cases of absolute necessity, and under our system of jurisprudence, that power is vested in the … the powers conferred upon said board as herein defined.
Cited 13 timesPublishedBoard of School Directors of Forsyth Co. v. Commissioners of Forsyth Co.
127 N.C. 263 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 1900
These facts are admitted, or not denied, by the defendants, and upon this state of facts his Honor made the following order: “It is ordered and adjudged that ■defendant Board of Commissioners of Forsyth County be restrained … The only case called to -our attention as authority in this case, was Board of Education of Bladen County v. Commissioners of Bladen, 113 N.C., 379 .
Cited 0 timesPublished53 L.R.A. 855 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 12, 1901
County Board v. State Board , 106 N.C. 81 . The statute incorporating the defendant (Laws 1899, ch. 24), does not contain the authority "to sue and be sued." … Lorillard v. Monroe , 11 N. Y., 392 ; Brown v. People , 75 N.Y. 441 .
Cited 32 timesPublishedPenland v. Town of Bryson City
199 N.C. 140 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1930
"We cite below certain decisions of this Court in regard to material and immaterial changes: In Brown v. Commissioners, 173 N. … Glenn v. Wray, 126 N. C., 730 ; Brown v. Stewart, 134 N. C., 357 .” In Claywell v. Commissioners, 173 N.
Cited 8 timesPublished151 N.C. 561 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1909
Harris v. Wright , 121, N.C. 171; McCormac v. Comrs. , 90 N.C. 441 ; Tate v. Comrs. , 122 N.C. 812 . In Jones v. … In Broadnax v. Groom , 64 N.C. 244 ; Cromartie v. Comrs. , 87 N.C. 134 ; Ward v.
Cited 19 timesPublished321 N.C. 590 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1988
Cited 6 timesPublishedNo opinion text235 N.C. 82 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 1952
Seawell v. Purvis, 232 N.C. 194 , 59 S.E. 2d *85 572; Taylor v. Schaub, 225 N.C. 134 , 33 S.E. 2d 658 ; Moore v. Moore, 224 N.C. 552 , 31 S.E. 2d 690 ; Brown v. Polk, 201 N.C. 375 , 160 S.E. 357 ; Bank v. … It is well settled that in an action for divorce, either absolute or from bed and board, it is permissible for the defendant to set up a cause of action for divorce, either absolute or from bed and board, as a counterclaim
Cited 48 timesPublished132 N.C. 697 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 26, 1903
Straus v. Beardsley, 79 N. C., 59 ; Dalton v. Webster, 82 N. C., 279 . … Collingood v. Brown, 106 N. C., 362 ; Arrinqton v. Arrington, 114 N. C., 151 .
Cited 14 timesPublished205 N.C. 208 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1933
Brown in reimbursement of the amount of the tax, penalty, interest and costs." From this judgment, plaintiff and the defendant, Wiley B. Brown, appealed to the Supreme Court. … Guy v. Harmon , 204 N.C. 226 , 167 S.E. 796 ; Orange Co. v. Wilson , 202 N.C. 424 , 163 S.E. 113 .
Cited 2 timesPublished197 N.C. 788 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 11, 1929
The evidence of defendant tended to show that the plaintiff was attempting to board a moving train, missed his footing, and fell under the train. … Hoggard v. R. R. , 194 N.C. 256 , 139 S.E. 372 ; Brown v. R. R. , 195 N.C. 699 , 140 S.E. 622 . Affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna