Case law

Lea Company v. Narth Carolina Bd. of Transportation

323 N.C. 697 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 4, 1989

Lea Company v. N.C. Board of Transportation, 308 N.C. 603, 304 S.E. 2d 164 (1983). … Collins v.

State Ex Rel. Bryan v. Rousseau

71 N.C. 194 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874

Bynum| Ji The State on the relation of Fell & Bro. v. Porter et al, 69 N. C. Reports 140, is decisive [of this case.

Carolina Marina and Yacht Club, LLC v. New Hanover County Board of Commissioners

365 N.C. 89 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 10, 2011

706 S.E.2d 253 (2011) CAROLINA MARINA AND YACHT CLUB, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and New Hanover County and Violet Ward, Intervenor. No. 457P10.

Board of Provincial Elders of the Southern Province of the Moravian Church v. Jones

273 N.C. 174 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 1968

Carroll v. Board of Trade, 259 N.C. 692 , 131 S.E. 2d 483 ; Whaley v. Taxi Company, 252 N.C. 586 , 114 S.E. 2d 254 ; Lewis v. Harris, 238 N.C. 642 , 78 S.E. 2d 715 . That is the only question before us on this appeal. … See: Carroll v. Board of Trade, supra; Conference v. Creech, supra; Ingle v. Stubbins, 240 N.C. 382 , 82 S.E. 2d 388 ; Huskins v. Hospital, supra; McIntosh, North Carolina Practice and Procedure, 2d ed., § 2196; 28 Am.

Greene County v. Snow Hill Railway Co.

197 N.C. 419 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 11, 1929

Leak v. Gay, 107 N. C., 468 , 12 S. E., 251 ; Edwards v. Commissioners, 183 N. C., 58 , 110 S. E., 600 ; Jones v. Board of Education, 185 N. C., 303 , 117 S. E., 37 ; Holton v. Mocksville 189 N. C., 144 , 126 S. … The point has been expressly decided in Brown v. Commissioners, 100 N. C., 92 , 5 S. E., 178 ; Tate v. Commissioners, 122 N. C., 812 , 30 S. E., 352 ; Newell v. Green, 169 N. C., 462 , 86 S. E., 291 .

Jamison v. City of Charlotte

239 N.C. 423 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 29, 1954

Woodard v. Mordecai, 234 N.C. 463 , 67 S.E. 2d 639 ; Bradham v. Robinson, 236 N.C. 589 , 73 S.E. 2d 555 . … Shore v. Bank, 207 N.C. 798 , 178 S.E. 572 ; Trust Co. v. Transit Lines, 198 N.C. 675 , 153 S.E. 158 ; Knott v. Taylor, 96 N.C. 553 , 2 S.E. 680 .

Butner v. . Lumber Co.

180 N.C. 612 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 24, 1920

A similar application of the principle had been previously made in Marlowe v. … Sawyer v. R. R. , 142 N.C. 1 ; Vassor v. R. R. , 142 N.C. 68 ; Daniel v. R. R. , 136 N.C. 517 ; Howe v. Newmarch , 94 Mass. 559 ; Stone v. Pugh , 115 Tenn. 688 ; Schulwitz v. Lumber Co. , 126 Mich. 559 ; Kiernan v.

State v. Mincher

172 N.C. 895 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 9, 1916

In S. v. Speaks, 94 N. … In the prevailing opinion in S. v. Nipper, 166 N. C., 272 ,- Mr.

Kirby v. Reynolds

212 N.C. 271 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1937

Conrad v. Board of Education, 190 N. C., 389 (393); Distributing Corp. v. Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue, 209 N. C., 47 (48). Tbe language in Harley & Lund Corp. v. … Perry v. Ins. Co., 137 N. C., 404 . Tbe principle is thus stated in Brown v. Kinsey, 81 N.

Smith v. Patton.

131 N.C. 396 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 2, 1902

Presson v. Boone, 108 N. C., 78 ; Bd. Education v. Bateman, 102 N. C., 52 ; 11 Am. St. Rep., 708 ; Morgan v. Smith, 95 N. C., 396 ; Havens v. Lathene, 75 N. C., 505 ; Board of Commissioners v. Clarke, 73 N. … Presson v. Boone, supra; Sharp v. Connelly, 105 N. C., 87 ; Thomas v. Connelly, 104 N. C., 342 ; Cassidy Ex Parte, 95 N. C., 225 ; Brown v. Coble, 76 N. C., 391 ; Greenlee v. Sudderth, 65 N. C., 470 ; Broughton v.

Hughes v. Knott.

138 N.C. 105 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1905

In Armitage v. Insole, 14 Ad. & Ell. (68 E. C. L. ) 727, *109 tbe plaintiffs sued for breach of contract by the defendants “to deliver free on board” a quantity of coal. … Brown v. Atkinson, 91 N. C., 389 . We have been unable to find any authority in regard to the question as to what would constitute readiness and ability under the. circumstances testified to by the plaintiff Plughes.

Graham County v. . Terry

194 N.C. 22 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 10, 1927

Barnes v. Barnes, 53 N. C., 366 . … We are not inadvertent to tbe principle that tbe law of contract enters into tbe contract itself (Hill v. Brown, 144 N.

Medlin v. Bass

327 N.C. 587 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1990

(emphasis added); see also Brown v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 93 N.C. … Brown, 93 N.C. App. at 437 , 378 S.E.2d at 235 .

Patterson v. . Commissioners

170 N.C. 503 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 22, 1915

That the said board of highway commissioners was empowered by said act to issue and sell bonds for the purpose of securing funds to construct said roads. 4. … and upkeep of all such bridges and culverts (505) still remain in and devolve upon the board of county commissioners of Swain County as provided for under the general law.

Foil v. Board of Drainage Comrs. of Big Cold Water Drainage District No. 1

192 N.C. 652 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 1926

Drain *655 age Comrs. v. Sparks, 179 N. C., 581 ; Pate v. Banks, 178 N. C., 139 ; Taylor v. Drainage Comrs., 176 N. C., 224 . C. … Helme v. Guy, 6 N. C., 342 . An “appurtenance” has been defined as “a thing which belongs to another thing as principal, and which passes as incident to the principal thing.”

Board of Trustees of the Fairmont Graded School District v. Mutual Loan & Trust Co.

181 N.C. 306 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 1921

Again, it is insisted that as the present act contains provisions for a bond issue, it should be upheld under the principle of Brown v. Comrs., 173 N. C., 598 ; Mills v. Comrs., 175 N. … Ill, Private Laws 1917, but in Dickson v.

State Board of Charities & Public Welfare v. Highland Hospital, Inc.

196 N.C. 752 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1929

Cement Co. v. Phillips, 182 N. C., 437 , 109 S. E., 257 . Appeal dismissed.

Johnson v. Wagner

219 N.C. 235 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1941

Brown, 29 Ill., 201 , as follows: “From very necessity a power must exist somewhere in the community to grant relief in such cases of absolute necessity, and under our system of jurisprudence, that power is vested in the … the powers conferred upon said board as herein defined.

Johnson v. . Wagner

219 N.C. 235 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1941

Brown , 29 Ill. 201 , as follows: "From very necessity a power must exist somewhere in the community to grant relief in such cases of absolute necessity, and under our system of jurisprudence, that power is vested in the … the powers conferred upon said board as herein defined.

Hood Ex Rel. Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of Financial Control

203 N.C. 119 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 29, 1932

In Morgan v. Bank, 190 N. C., 209 , 129 S. … Trust Co. v. Rose, 192 N. C., 673 , 135 S. E., 795 .