Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

4.19s

  • New Hanover Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Stein

    823 S.E.2d 393 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 2019

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Burton v. Matthews

    250 N.C. 236 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1959

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Butler v. Scot. Cnty. Bd. of Educ.

    813 S.E.2d 853 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2018

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Farmers & Merchants Bank of Baltimore v. Board of Aldermen of City of Charlotte

    75 N.C. 45 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1876

    Erwins v. Lowrey, 64 N. C. Rep., 321 ; Swepson v. Harvy, 66 N. C. Rep., 436 . … And in Caswell v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bolling v. . Belk-White Co.

    228 N.C. 749 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1948

    Taylor v. Wake Forest, supra. There must be some causal connection between the employment and the injury. Canter v. Board of Education, 201 N. C., 836 , 160 S. E., 924 ; Chambers v. Oil Co., 199 N. C., 28 , 153 S. … E., 594 ; Plemmons v. White’s Service, 213 N. C., 148 , 195 S. E., 370 ; Ridout v. Rose’s Stores, Inc., 205 N. C., 423 , 17 S. E. (2d), 642 ; Harden v. Furniture Co., 199 N. C., 733 , 155 S. E., 728 ; Brown v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Harper v. . Harper

    148 N.C. 453 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1908

    Brown v. Hamilton, 135 N. C., 10 ; Cox v. Lumber Co., 124 N. C., 78 ; Blue v. Bitter, 118 N. C., 580 ; 30 Am. and Eng. (2d Ed.), 667. … Foil v. Newsome, 138 N. C., 115 ; Glasscock v. Gray, ante; Morgan v. Huggins, 9 L. R. A., 540; Webster’s Dictionary; Bouvier’s Law Dictionary.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • State v. Anderson

    265 N.C. 548 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1965

    See State v. Thompson, 257 N.C. 452 , 126 S.E. 2d 58 ; State v. Merritt, 244 N.C. 687 , 94 S.E. 2d 825 ; State v. Albarty, 238 N.C. 130 , 76 S.E. 2d 381 ; State v. Williams, 210 N.C. 159 , 185 S.E. 661 . … State v. Camel, 230 N.C. 426 , 53 S.E. 2d 313 ; State v. Epps, 213 N.C. 709 , 197 S.E. 580 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Silver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs

    808 S.E.2d 144 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 22, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Perley v. Ballenger Paving Co.

    228 N.C. 479 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1948

    The facts upon which the decisions were based in Gulf Refining Co. v. Brown, 93 E. (2), 870; Burruss v. Logging Co., 31 P. (2), 263; Burnett *484 v. Ind. Com., 63 N. E. (2), 240; and Ridgdell v. … School Board, 16 So. (2), 55, cited by plaintiffs, are distinguishable from the facts in the case at bar and may not be held controlling here.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Shuler v. Burnhardt Lumber Co.

    180 N.C. 648 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 24, 1920

    We are of the opinion that the following cases are clear authority against this position: Wilson v. Brown, 134 N. C., 400 ; Reynolds v. Cathens, 50 N. C., 438 ; Eddleman v. Carpenter, 52 N. C., 617 , Scarboro v. … It was held in Wilson v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Coble v. . Comrs.

    184 N.C. 342 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 1922

    The act construed in Brown v. Comrs. , 173 N.C. 600 , was obviously intended to create a taxing district for road purposes, and the power of the Legislature to enact it was upheld. This case was affirmed in Mills v. … Comrs. , 175 N.C. 215 ; Parvin v. Comrs. , 177 N.C. 508 ; Comrs. v. Pruden , 178 N.C. 394 ; Martin County v. Bank , 178 N.C. 26 ; Comrs. v. Bank , 178 N.C. 170 . See, also, Board of Trustees v. Webb , 155 N.C. 379 .

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Silver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs

    807 S.E.2d 579 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Silver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs

    809 S.E.2d 285 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 8, 2018

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kenan v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL

    281 N.C. 314 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1972

    KENAN v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF the TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL et al. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 24, 1972. Manning, Allen & Hudson, for plaintiff. Haywood, Denny & Miller, for defendants.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gill v. . Commissioners

    160 N.C. 176 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1912

    J., and BROWN, J., dissenting. … By the statute, the boards were not authorized to act at all until a properly signed petition had been filed. R. R. v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Silver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs

    807 S.E.2d 578 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The B'd of Com. of Craven v. . B'd of Com. of Pamlico

    73 N.C. 298 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1875

    Moore v. Ballard, 69 N. C., 21 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Silver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs

    806 S.E.2d 675 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Silver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners

    805 S.E.2d 297 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 26, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Storm v. Town of Wrightsville Beach

    189 N.C. 679 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1925

    In Construction Co. v. Brockenbrough, 187 N. C., p. 77, we said: “As was said in Board of Education v. Comrs., supra (183 N. … C., 275 ; Brown v. Stewart, 134 N. C., 357 ; Comrs. v. Packing Co., 135 N. C., 62 ; Claywell v. Comrs., 173 N. C., 657 ; Road Comrs. v. Comrs., 178 N. C., 61 . A different state of facts were presented in Brown v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.