Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.19s
New Hanover Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Stein
823 S.E.2d 393 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 2019
Cited 0 timesPublished250 N.C. 236 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1959
Cited 0 timesPublishedButler v. Scot. Cnty. Bd. of Educ.
813 S.E.2d 853 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2018
Cited 0 timesPublishedFarmers & Merchants Bank of Baltimore v. Board of Aldermen of City of Charlotte
75 N.C. 45 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1876
Erwins v. Lowrey, 64 N. C. Rep., 321 ; Swepson v. Harvy, 66 N. C. Rep., 436 . … And in Caswell v.
Cited 4 timesPublished228 N.C. 749 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1948
Taylor v. Wake Forest, supra. There must be some causal connection between the employment and the injury. Canter v. Board of Education, 201 N. C., 836 , 160 S. E., 924 ; Chambers v. Oil Co., 199 N. C., 28 , 153 S. … E., 594 ; Plemmons v. White’s Service, 213 N. C., 148 , 195 S. E., 370 ; Ridout v. Rose’s Stores, Inc., 205 N. C., 423 , 17 S. E. (2d), 642 ; Harden v. Furniture Co., 199 N. C., 733 , 155 S. E., 728 ; Brown v.
Cited 16 timesPublished148 N.C. 453 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1908
Brown v. Hamilton, 135 N. C., 10 ; Cox v. Lumber Co., 124 N. C., 78 ; Blue v. Bitter, 118 N. C., 580 ; 30 Am. and Eng. (2d Ed.), 667. … Foil v. Newsome, 138 N. C., 115 ; Glasscock v. Gray, ante; Morgan v. Huggins, 9 L. R. A., 540; Webster’s Dictionary; Bouvier’s Law Dictionary.
Cited 16 timesPublished265 N.C. 548 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1965
See State v. Thompson, 257 N.C. 452 , 126 S.E. 2d 58 ; State v. Merritt, 244 N.C. 687 , 94 S.E. 2d 825 ; State v. Albarty, 238 N.C. 130 , 76 S.E. 2d 381 ; State v. Williams, 210 N.C. 159 , 185 S.E. 661 . … State v. Camel, 230 N.C. 426 , 53 S.E. 2d 313 ; State v. Epps, 213 N.C. 709 , 197 S.E. 580 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedSilver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
808 S.E.2d 144 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 22, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedPerley v. Ballenger Paving Co.
228 N.C. 479 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1948
The facts upon which the decisions were based in Gulf Refining Co. v. Brown, 93 E. (2), 870; Burruss v. Logging Co., 31 P. (2), 263; Burnett *484 v. Ind. Com., 63 N. E. (2), 240; and Ridgdell v. … School Board, 16 So. (2), 55, cited by plaintiffs, are distinguishable from the facts in the case at bar and may not be held controlling here.
Cited 9 timesPublishedShuler v. Burnhardt Lumber Co.
180 N.C. 648 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 24, 1920
We are of the opinion that the following cases are clear authority against this position: Wilson v. Brown, 134 N. C., 400 ; Reynolds v. Cathens, 50 N. C., 438 ; Eddleman v. Carpenter, 52 N. C., 617 , Scarboro v. … It was held in Wilson v.
Cited 1 timesPublished184 N.C. 342 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 1922
The act construed in Brown v. Comrs. , 173 N.C. 600 , was obviously intended to create a taxing district for road purposes, and the power of the Legislature to enact it was upheld. This case was affirmed in Mills v. … Comrs. , 175 N.C. 215 ; Parvin v. Comrs. , 177 N.C. 508 ; Comrs. v. Pruden , 178 N.C. 394 ; Martin County v. Bank , 178 N.C. 26 ; Comrs. v. Bank , 178 N.C. 170 . See, also, Board of Trustees v. Webb , 155 N.C. 379 .
Cited 23 timesPublishedSilver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
807 S.E.2d 579 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedSilver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
809 S.E.2d 285 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 8, 2018
Cited 0 timesPublishedKenan v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL
281 N.C. 314 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1972
KENAN v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF the TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL et al. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 24, 1972. Manning, Allen & Hudson, for plaintiff. Haywood, Denny & Miller, for defendants.
Cited 0 timesPublished160 N.C. 176 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1912
J., and BROWN, J., dissenting. … By the statute, the boards were not authorized to act at all until a properly signed petition had been filed. R. R. v.
Cited 27 timesPublishedSilver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
807 S.E.2d 578 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedThe B'd of Com. of Craven v. . B'd of Com. of Pamlico
73 N.C. 298 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1875
Moore v. Ballard, 69 N. C., 21 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedSilver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
806 S.E.2d 675 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedSilver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners
805 S.E.2d 297 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 26, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedStorm v. Town of Wrightsville Beach
189 N.C. 679 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1925
In Construction Co. v. Brockenbrough, 187 N. C., p. 77, we said: “As was said in Board of Education v. Comrs., supra (183 N. … C., 275 ; Brown v. Stewart, 134 N. C., 357 ; Comrs. v. Packing Co., 135 N. C., 62 ; Claywell v. Comrs., 173 N. C., 657 ; Road Comrs. v. Comrs., 178 N. C., 61 . A different state of facts were presented in Brown v.
Cited 25 timesPublished
Ask Donna