Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

1.18s

  • Wilson Miller v. . Derr

    69 N.C. 137 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1873

    Smith v. Brown, 3 Hawks, -580. Having introduced it, we know no reason why they were not at liberty to show what it contained when given, and that some words had since been obliterated. … Matthis v. Matthis, 3 D. & B., 60; Dunn v. Clements, 7 Jones, 58 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • R. R. v. . Commissioners

    109 N.C. 159 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1891

    Goldsboro , 96 N.C. 49 ; Duke v. Brown , 96 N.C. 127 ; Markham v. Manning , 96 N.C. 132 ; McDowell v. Construction Co. , 96 N.C. 81 ; Riggsbee v. Durham , 99 N.C. 341 . … Duke v. Brown , 96 N.C. 127 . Jones v. Commissioners , 107 N.C. 248 , differs from this case.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cohoon v. . Harrell

    180 N.C. 39 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 15, 1920

    Oil Co. v. Burney, 174 N. C., 382 ; Riddick v. Dunn, 145 N. C., 31 ; Brown v. Atkinson, 91 N. C., 389 ; 17 Corpus Juris, 492, et seq.; Lawson on Presumptive Evidence, pp. 16-17; Anson on Contracts, p. 328. … Brantley, the purchaser of the timber, was to the effect that in the contract of sale, which was in parol, plaintiff sold to Brantley “all merchantable timber to be cut from the Simmons place at $9 per thousand feet, board

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cain Moffitt v. Davis

    205 N.C. 565 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 10, 1934

    C., 445 , and dissenting opinion by Brown, J., concurred in by Walker, J. In Fore v. Feimster, 171 N. … Hipp v. Farrell, 173 N. C., 167 ; Brown v. R. R., 188 N. C., 52 ; Noland v. Trustees, 190 N. C., 250 . In the Fore case, supra, the violation of the particular act is made a misdemeanor.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Parker v. Wilson

    247 N.C. 47 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1957

    There was a dent in the instrument board near the center and blood and brown hair imbedded. Miss Patrick had brown hair. Wilson’s hair was black.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Walker v. Board of Trustees of North Carolina Local Governmental Employees' Retirement System

    348 N.C. 63 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1998

    Walker v. Board of Trustees of the N.C. Local Governmental Employees’ Retirement Sys., 127 N.C. App. 156 , 487 S.E.2d 839 (1997). … See Pritchett v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • State v. Squire

    292 N.C. 494 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 1977

    That being true, it was not error for the judge to admit testimony as to the statement by the defendant Brown without making the specific finding that she had waived her right to counsel. State v. … State v. Fox, 274 N.C. 277 , 163 S.E. 2d 492 (1968). The statement by Squire did not refer to the defendant Brown, directly or indirectly.

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • McMillan v. Robeson County

    262 N.C. 413 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 10, 1964

    Marshall v. Lovelass, 1 N.C. 412 ; Phelps v. *418 Chesson, 34 N.C. 194 ; Parish v. Cedar Co., 133 N.C. 478 , 45 S.E. 768 ; Lumber Co. v. … Brown, 161 U.S. 256 , 40 L. Ed. 691 , 16 S. Ct. 585 ; Security Savings Bank v. California, 263 U.S. 282 , 68 L. Ed. 301 , 44 S. Ct. 108 , 31 A.L.R. 391 ; Standard Oil Co. v. New Jersey, 341 U.S. 428 , 95 L.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State v. Cooper

    275 N.C. 283 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 14, 1969

    Brown, 263 N.C. 786 , 140 S.E. 2d 413 , that the evidence was insufficient to support a verdict of guilty of the criminal offense charged in the indictment. … State v. Hicks, 233 N.C. 31 , 62 S.E. 2d 497 , and cases cited; State v. Keziah, 258 N.C. 52 , 127 S.E. 2d 784 ; State v. Kimball, 261 N.C. 582 , 135 S.E. 2d 568 . In State v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Deal v. Enon Sanitary District

    245 N.C. 74 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 28, 1956

    Arey v. Lemons, 232 N.C. 531 , 61 S.E. 2d 596 ; Cameron v. Highway Com., 188 N.C. 84 , 123 S.E. 465 . … Tarboro v. Forbes, 185 N.C. 59 , 116 S.E. 81 ; Armstrong v. Beaman, supra; Charlotte v. Brown, 165 N.C. 435 , 81 S.E. 611 ; Shelton v. White, supra; McQuillin’s Municipal Corp., 1921 Supp., sec. 1858.”

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • O'Briant v. O'Briant

    239 N.C. 101 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1953

    Cobb v. Cobb, 211 N.C. 146 , 189 S.E. 479 ; Brown v. Brown, 205 N.C. 64 , 169 S.E. 818 . … Whiteman v. Transportation Co., 231 N.C. 701 , 58 S.E. 2d 752 ; Turnage v. McLawhon, 232 N.C. 515 , 61 S.E. 2d 336 ; Caddell v. Caddell, 236 N.C. 686 , 76 S.E. 2d 923 ; McIntosh 545.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Farris v. Southern Railway Co.

    151 N.C. 483 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1909

    Bradley v. Railroad, 126 N. C., 735 ; Brown v. Railroad, 32 N. Y., 597 ; Falener v. Railroad, 68 Miss., 355 ; Railroad v. Summers, 68 Miss., 566 ; French v. Railroad, 116 Mass., 537 ; Railroad v. … Crossing at this point enabled the employees to reach their homes and boarding places more quickly and to return to their work *489 ‘more promptly.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Bryan v. Hilton Lumber Co.

    154 N.C. 485 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 5, 1911

    Whitson v. Wrenn, 134 N. C., 86 ; Covington v. Furniture Co., 138 N. C., 374 . … Harvell v. Lumber Co., ante, 254. Plaintiff’s negligent conduct fills to the full measure the requirements of proximate cause as expressed by Mr. Justice Hoke in Ramsbottom v. R. R., 138 N.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Yoes

    271 N.C. 616 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1967

    Miller, *632 237 N.C. 29 , 74 S.E. 2d 513 ; State v. Brown, 233 N.C. 202 , 63 S.E. 2d 99 . … State v. Lowry and State v. Mallory, supra; State v. Wilson, supra; Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S. Ct. 397 , 97 L. Ed. 469 .

    Cited 64 timesPublished
  • Greensboro v. . Guilford County and School Dist.

    209 N.C. 655 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 18, 1936

    These schools were not established, maintained, or operated by the Board of Commissioners or by the Board of Education of Guilford County. … by said Board of Education, under statutory authority.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • City of Charlotte v. Alexander

    173 N.C. 515 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 16, 1917

    Hospital v. Hobbs, 153 N. C., 188 . In Peele v. Powell, 156 N. … Charlotte v. Brown, 165 N. C., 435 . 3. The waivers (copies'of which are set out in the record) are not nudum pactum, but are valid and enforcible by the plaintiff when duly executed and delivered.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Cubbage v. Board of Trustees of the Endowment Fund of NC State University

    367 N.C. 777 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 24, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cubbage v. Board of Trustees of the Endowment Fund of NC State University

    367 N.C. 778 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cubbage v. Board of Trustees of the Endowment Fund of NC State University

    367 N.C. 801 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • New Hanover Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Stein

    826 S.E.2d 455 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 2, 2019

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.