Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.73s
Phillips v. Interstate Land Co.
176 N.C. 514 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 1918
Brown, J. This action is brought to recover on the following note: $2,000. Laurinburg, N. C., September 25, 1911. January 10, 1912, after date, we promise to pay to the order of M. M. … Watson v. Mfg. Co., 147 N. C., 475 ; Davis v. Ins. Co., 134 N. C., 60 ; Bank v. Oil Co., 157 N. C., 302 .
Cited 8 timesPublishedState v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
359 N.C. 277 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 20, 2005
Trust Certification Board, Inc. … Reynolds Tobacco Co. and Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.), and Lorillard Tobacco Company (herein “respondentappellees”) responses thereto, filed 12 January 2005, the Court orders as follows: 1.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSnipes v. Norfolk & Southern Railroad
144 N.C. 18 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 19, 1907
The relative rights and duties of persons, who are either on or in the act of boarding a street car, and the employees of the company, have been so recently and clearly discussed and stated by this Court in Clark v. … Justice Brown cites the authorities and draws the conclusions therefrom, that we do not deem it necessary to do more than refer to the opinion, and apply the law to the facts of this case. *21 His Honor instructed tbe jury
Cited 2 timesPublishedJoyner v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
267 N.C. 44 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1966
Craver and wife v. Board of Adjustment. The two cases were argued together by the same counsel. On the authority of that decision, the judgment is Affirmed. Moore, J., not sitting.
Cited 0 timesPublished142 N.C. 246 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1906
Boyce v. Anderson , 2 Pet., 150 . … Bernhardt v. Brown, supra .
Cited 16 timesPublished259 N.C. 566 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 14, 1963
Brown v. Terhune (N.J.), 18 A. 2d 73 . The New Jersey procedure as set forth in Payne v. Borough of Sea Bright (N.J.), 187 A. 627 , is approved in Eastern Boulevard Corporation v. … Board of Adjustment, supra; Chambers v. Board of Adjustment, 250 N.C. 194 , 198, 108 S.E. 2d 211 ; Jarrell v. Board of Adjustment, 258 N.C. 476, 480 , 128 S.E. 2d 879 . The statute (G.S.
Cited 24 timesPublished140 N.C. 530 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 13, 1906
Brown, J. At the conclusion of the evidence defendant moved to nonsuit the' plaintiff. The court overruled the motion and defendant excepted. … Kiser v. Barytes Co., 131 N. C., 610. While the accident to plaintiff’s band is to be lamented, we are unable to find in the record any evidence of negligence upon the part of defendant which caused the injury.
Cited 5 timesPublished208 N.C. 675 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1935
Moore v. Bell, 191 N. C., 305 ; Wood v. Braswell, 192 N. C., 588 ; Yarborough v. N. C. Park Commission, 196 N. C., 284 . … See, also, Person v. Doughton, 186 N. C., 723 (725), and cases there cited. This case is not like Griffith v. Board of Education, 183 N.
Cited 4 timesPublished163 N.C. 90 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 1913
BROWN, J., did not sit and took no part in the decision of this case. … BROWN, J., did not sit and took no part in the decision of this case. Cited: Parker v. Johnson, ante , 75; Griffin v. Comrs. , 169 N.C. 644 ; Banks v. Lane , 170 N.C. 16 ; Drainage District v.
Cited 4 timesPublished185 N.C. 59 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1923
Louis v. Brown, 155 Mo., 545 ; Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. St. … Corp., sec. 1402, and note; Ziegler v. Hopkins, 117 U. S., 683 ; Ogden v. Armstrong, 168 U. S., 236 ; Holland v. Baltimore, 11 Md., 186 ; Greensboro v. McAdoo, 112 N. C., 359 ; Charlotte v. Brown, 165 N. C., 438 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Burke v. Commissioners of Bessemer City
148 N.C. 46 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 25, 1908
Ellison v. Raleigh, 89 N. C., 125 ; Brown v. Turner, 70 N. C., 93 ; Howerton v. Tate, 66 N. C., 231 . 2. … Should it be factiously rejected, that matter can be shown in proceedings for mandamus, and possibly by action for damages against the factious board.
Cited 5 timesPublishedMcGladrey & Pullen, Llp v. North Carolina State Board of Certified Public Accountant Examiners
627 S.E.2d 461 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 2006
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textBoard of Trustees of Plymouth Graded School District v. Pruden & Co.
179 N.C. 617 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1920
Comrs. v. Malone, ante, 10. … Comrs. v. Malone, supra.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBowden v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
144 N.C. 28 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1907
Brown, J. We think the motion to nonsuit the plaintiff should have been -allowed. … Owens v. Railroad, 126 N. C., 139 .
Cited 12 timesPublished134 N.C. 77 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1903
C., at p. 131; Ury v. Brown, 129 N. C., 271 ; In re Anderson, 132 N. C., at p. 247; Railroad v. Siroud, 132 N. C., at p. 416. … Kirchegessner v. Board of Health, 53 N. J. Law, 594. let it be entered: Action Dismissed.
Cited 31 timesPublishedMorris v. Board of Trustees of the Newton Graded School District
184 N.C. 634 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 29, 1922
The second ground of exception is the alleged failure of the board of commissioners to state in their notice the purpose for which the election was to be held. … Hardee v. Henderson, 170 N. C., 572 ; Hill v. Skinner, 169 N. C., 407 ; Miller v. School District, ante, 197; 113 S. E., 786 . The judgment is Affirmed. ’
Cited 0 timesPublishedNova University v. Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina
305 N.C. 156 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1982
Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925); Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923); State v. Williams, 253 N.C. 337 , 117 S.E. 2d 444 (1960). State v. … of Insurance v.
Cited 5 timesPublished665 S.E.2d 457 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 23, 2008
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of July 2008 by NC School Boards for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief: "Motion Allowed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDay v. Commissioners of Yadkin County
191 N.C. 780 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 19, 1926
Brodnax v. Groom, 64 N. C., 244 ; Gleen v. Comrs., 139 N. C., 413 ; Davenport v. Board of Education, 183 N. C., 570 ; Person v. Watts, 184 N. C., 499, 506 ; Lee v. Waynesville, ibid., 565; Parks v. Comrs., 186 N. … In Brown v. Comrs., 173 N.
Cited 13 timesPublishedMartin v. Board of Trustees of Leaksville Township Public School District
199 N.C. 691 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 12, 1930
S. v. Guertin, 130 A. S. R., 610; Trustees of Vernon Soc. v. Hills, 16 A. D., 429; Treasurer of State v. Mann, 80 A. D., 688; Quitman Oil Co. v. Peacock, 81 S. E. (Ga.), 908. … As was said in Burns v. McGregor, 90 N.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna