Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

0.74s

  • County Board of Education of Guilford County v. City of High Point

    213 N.C. 636 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 25, 1938

    This section was passed upon by this Court in S. v. Maultsby, 139 N.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Horner Military School v. Rogers

    167 N.C. 270 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 11, 1914

    BrowN, J. This action is brought to recover the tuition charges for defendant’s two sons. … The law implies that the board and lodging to be furnished by plaintiff must be clean, decent, and reasonably wholesome.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State to the Use of the Board of Education v. . Moody

    74 N.C. 76 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Morgan v. Town of Tarboro

    174 N.C. 104 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 26, 1917

    Brown, J. Tbe town of Tarboro owns a “Town Common,” or park conveyed to it in 1760 by Joseph .ILowell, lying on tbe east and west side of Main Street. … This is the only reference to the matter in the minutes of the board of commissioners, and the only authority delegated by the board. Later, Mr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Comrs. v. . Comrs.

    121 N.C. 295 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1897

    *Page 235 The chairman of the plaintiff board of commissioners procured a physician and board and nursing at a private house for Beck until he was able to be removed, when the plaintiff board ordered him to be carried to … The question was considered and decided by this Court in Comrs. v. Comrs. , 101 N.C. 520 . Upon the principle of that case, the plaintiff in this case is entitled to recover on the record before us. Reversed. (297)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Roach v. . Pritchett

    228 N.C. 747 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1948

    Rader v. Coach Co., 225 N. C., 537 , 35 S. E. (2d), 609 , and cited cases; Fox v. Mills, Inc., 225 N. C., 580 , 35 S. E. (2d), 869 ; Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N. C., 107 , 37 S. E. (2d), 128 ; King v. Rudd, 226 N. … E. (2d), 116 ; Redwine v. Clodfelter, 226 N. C., 366 , 38 S. E. (2d), 203 ; Smith v. Smith, 226 N. C., 506 , 39 S. E. (2d), 391 ; Swink v. Horn, 226 N. C., 713 , 40 S. E. (2d), 353 ; Brown v. Truck Lines, 227 N.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Cooke v. . Cooke

    164 N.C. 272 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 3, 1913

    BROWN, J., concurring; WALKER, J., dissenting; ALLEN, J., concurring in dissenting opinion. … Evans v. Evans , 43 Minn. 31 ; Edgerly v. Edgerly , 112 Mass. 53 ; Green v. Green , L. R. Courts, Pro. Div., 121; Mason v. Mason , L. R., Pro. Div., 121.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Clark v. . Traction Co.

    138 N.C. 77 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1905

    Brown, J. … Dudley v. Cable Co., 13 F. R., 129; Terminal Co. v. Morris, 44 S. E., 720 ; Akersloot v. Ry. Co., 15 L. R. A. (N. Y.) 489. In Akersloot v. Ry.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • City of New Bern v. New Bern-Craven County Board of Education

    338 N.C. 430 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 9, 1994

    State of N.C., 320 N.C. 640, 647 , 360 S.E.2d 756, 761 (1987) (quoting Glenn v. Board of Education, 210 N.C. 525, 529 , 187 S.E. 781, 784 (1936)); see also Komegay v. … This Court reached a similar conclusion in Board of Health v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Pullen v. . Raleigh

    68 N.C. 451 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1873

    Pullen and others, plaintiffs, v . The Board of Com'rs of the City of Raleigh, Defendants. … Murfreesboro , 96 N.C. 321 ; Winston v. Taylor , 99 N.C. 213 ; Plymouth v. Cooper , 135 N.C. 7 ; Charlotte v. Brown , 165 N.C. 437 . Overruled: Redmond v. Commissioners , 106 N.C. 127 . *Page 315 (457)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Smith v. City of Wilmington

    98 N.C. 343 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1887

    (Perry v. Whitaker , 71 N.C. 475 ; Southerland v. Goldsboro , 96 N.C. 49 ; Duke v. Brown, ibid. , 127; McDowell v. Construction Co., ibid. , 514, and Wood v. Oxford , 97 N.C. 227 , cited.) … Southerland v. Goldsboro , 96 N.C. 49 ; Duke v. Brown, ibid. , 127; McDowell v. The Construction Co., ibid. , 514; Wood v. Oxford , 97 N.C. 227 . The registration of voters is essential and very important.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Deans v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

    152 N.C. 171 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1910

    Sherrill v. Tel. Co., 109 N. C., 527 ; Lewis v. Tel. Co., 117 N. C., 436 ; Cigar Co. v. Express Co., 120 N. C., 348 ; Watch Co. v. Express Co., 120 N. C., 351 .” … This position is met by the *173 ■eases of Sherrill v. Tel. Co., 109 N. C., 527 , and Cigar Co. v. Express Co., 120 N. C., 348 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Mathis v. Manufacturing Co.

    140 N.C. 530 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 13, 1906

    Brown, J. At the conclusion of the evidence defendant moved to nonsuit the' plaintiff. The court overruled the motion and defendant excepted. … Kiser v. Barytes Co., 131 N. C., 610. While the accident to plaintiff’s band is to be lamented, we are unable to find in the record any evidence of negligence upon the part of defendant which caused the injury.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Fowle Memorial Hospital Co. v. Nicholson

    189 N.C. 44 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 24, 1925

    Brown and J. F. Randolph did not attend the meeting. … J., 112, sec. 1880; Railroad v. Bowler, 1 Bush (Ky.), 468 ; Wing v. Dillingham, 239 Fed., 54 ; Lime Works v. Moss, 70 So. R. (Ala.), 292; Hoffman v. Reichart, 37 A. S. R. (Ill.), 219; McIver v. Hardware Co., 144 N.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Ewbank v. Turner.

    134 N.C. 77 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1903

    C., at p. 131; Ury v. Brown, 129 N. C., 271 ; In re Anderson, 132 N. C., at p. 247; Railroad v. Siroud, 132 N. C., at p. 416. … Kirchegessner v. Board of Health, 53 N. J. Law, 594. let it be entered: Action Dismissed.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Phillips v. Interstate Land Co.

    176 N.C. 514 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 1918

    Brown, J. This action is brought to recover on the following note: $2,000. Laurinburg, N. C., September 25, 1911. January 10, 1912, after date, we promise to pay to the order of M. M. … Watson v. Mfg. Co., 147 N. C., 475 ; Davis v. Ins. Co., 134 N. C., 60 ; Bank v. Oil Co., 157 N. C., 302 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In Re Markham

    259 N.C. 566 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 14, 1963

    Brown v. Terhune (N.J.), 18 A. 2d 73 . The New Jersey procedure as set forth in Payne v. Borough of Sea Bright (N.J.), 187 A. 627 , is approved in Eastern Boulevard Corporation v. … Board of Adjustment, supra; Chambers v. Board of Adjustment, 250 N.C. 194 , 198, 108 S.E. 2d 211 ; Jarrell v. Board of Adjustment, 258 N.C. 476, 480 , 128 S.E. 2d 879 . The statute (G.S.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Hollingsworth v. . Skelding

    142 N.C. 246 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1906

    Boyce v. Anderson , 2 Pet., 150 . … Bernhardt v. Brown, supra .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Day v. Commissioners of Yadkin County

    191 N.C. 780 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 19, 1926

    Brodnax v. Groom, 64 N. C., 244 ; Gleen v. Comrs., 139 N. C., 413 ; Davenport v. Board of Education, 183 N. C., 570 ; Person v. Watts, 184 N. C., 499, 506 ; Lee v. Waynesville, ibid., 565; Parks v. Comrs., 186 N. … In Brown v. Comrs., 173 N.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State v. Crews

    286 N.C. 41 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 26, 1974

    In plain view was only a brown bottle containing pills. The bottle itself was not contraband. … See Coolidge v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.