Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.74s
County Board of Education of Guilford County v. City of High Point
213 N.C. 636 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 25, 1938
This section was passed upon by this Court in S. v. Maultsby, 139 N.
Cited 5 timesPublishedHorner Military School v. Rogers
167 N.C. 270 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 11, 1914
BrowN, J. This action is brought to recover the tuition charges for defendant’s two sons. … The law implies that the board and lodging to be furnished by plaintiff must be clean, decent, and reasonably wholesome.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState to the Use of the Board of Education v. . Moody
74 N.C. 76 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876
Cited 0 timesPublished174 N.C. 104 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 26, 1917
Brown, J. Tbe town of Tarboro owns a “Town Common,” or park conveyed to it in 1760 by Joseph .ILowell, lying on tbe east and west side of Main Street. … This is the only reference to the matter in the minutes of the board of commissioners, and the only authority delegated by the board. Later, Mr.
Cited 1 timesPublished121 N.C. 295 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1897
*Page 235 The chairman of the plaintiff board of commissioners procured a physician and board and nursing at a private house for Beck until he was able to be removed, when the plaintiff board ordered him to be carried to … The question was considered and decided by this Court in Comrs. v. Comrs. , 101 N.C. 520 . Upon the principle of that case, the plaintiff in this case is entitled to recover on the record before us. Reversed. (297)
Cited 0 timesPublished228 N.C. 747 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1948
Rader v. Coach Co., 225 N. C., 537 , 35 S. E. (2d), 609 , and cited cases; Fox v. Mills, Inc., 225 N. C., 580 , 35 S. E. (2d), 869 ; Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N. C., 107 , 37 S. E. (2d), 128 ; King v. Rudd, 226 N. … E. (2d), 116 ; Redwine v. Clodfelter, 226 N. C., 366 , 38 S. E. (2d), 203 ; Smith v. Smith, 226 N. C., 506 , 39 S. E. (2d), 391 ; Swink v. Horn, 226 N. C., 713 , 40 S. E. (2d), 353 ; Brown v. Truck Lines, 227 N.
Cited 16 timesPublished164 N.C. 272 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 3, 1913
BROWN, J., concurring; WALKER, J., dissenting; ALLEN, J., concurring in dissenting opinion. … Evans v. Evans , 43 Minn. 31 ; Edgerly v. Edgerly , 112 Mass. 53 ; Green v. Green , L. R. Courts, Pro. Div., 121; Mason v. Mason , L. R., Pro. Div., 121.
Cited 18 timesPublished138 N.C. 77 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1905
Brown, J. … Dudley v. Cable Co., 13 F. R., 129; Terminal Co. v. Morris, 44 S. E., 720 ; Akersloot v. Ry. Co., 15 L. R. A. (N. Y.) 489. In Akersloot v. Ry.
Cited 26 timesPublishedCity of New Bern v. New Bern-Craven County Board of Education
338 N.C. 430 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 9, 1994
State of N.C., 320 N.C. 640, 647 , 360 S.E.2d 756, 761 (1987) (quoting Glenn v. Board of Education, 210 N.C. 525, 529 , 187 S.E. 781, 784 (1936)); see also Komegay v. … This Court reached a similar conclusion in Board of Health v.
Cited 10 timesPublished68 N.C. 451 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1873
Pullen and others, plaintiffs, v . The Board of Com'rs of the City of Raleigh, Defendants. … Murfreesboro , 96 N.C. 321 ; Winston v. Taylor , 99 N.C. 213 ; Plymouth v. Cooper , 135 N.C. 7 ; Charlotte v. Brown , 165 N.C. 437 . Overruled: Redmond v. Commissioners , 106 N.C. 127 . *Page 315 (457)
Cited 3 timesPublished98 N.C. 343 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1887
(Perry v. Whitaker , 71 N.C. 475 ; Southerland v. Goldsboro , 96 N.C. 49 ; Duke v. Brown, ibid. , 127; McDowell v. Construction Co., ibid. , 514, and Wood v. Oxford , 97 N.C. 227 , cited.) … Southerland v. Goldsboro , 96 N.C. 49 ; Duke v. Brown, ibid. , 127; McDowell v. The Construction Co., ibid. , 514; Wood v. Oxford , 97 N.C. 227 . The registration of voters is essential and very important.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDeans v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
152 N.C. 171 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1910
Sherrill v. Tel. Co., 109 N. C., 527 ; Lewis v. Tel. Co., 117 N. C., 436 ; Cigar Co. v. Express Co., 120 N. C., 348 ; Watch Co. v. Express Co., 120 N. C., 351 .” … This position is met by the *173 ■eases of Sherrill v. Tel. Co., 109 N. C., 527 , and Cigar Co. v. Express Co., 120 N. C., 348 .
Cited 3 timesPublished140 N.C. 530 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 13, 1906
Brown, J. At the conclusion of the evidence defendant moved to nonsuit the' plaintiff. The court overruled the motion and defendant excepted. … Kiser v. Barytes Co., 131 N. C., 610. While the accident to plaintiff’s band is to be lamented, we are unable to find in the record any evidence of negligence upon the part of defendant which caused the injury.
Cited 5 timesPublishedFowle Memorial Hospital Co. v. Nicholson
189 N.C. 44 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 24, 1925
Brown and J. F. Randolph did not attend the meeting. … J., 112, sec. 1880; Railroad v. Bowler, 1 Bush (Ky.), 468 ; Wing v. Dillingham, 239 Fed., 54 ; Lime Works v. Moss, 70 So. R. (Ala.), 292; Hoffman v. Reichart, 37 A. S. R. (Ill.), 219; McIver v. Hardware Co., 144 N.
Cited 12 timesPublished134 N.C. 77 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1903
C., at p. 131; Ury v. Brown, 129 N. C., 271 ; In re Anderson, 132 N. C., at p. 247; Railroad v. Siroud, 132 N. C., at p. 416. … Kirchegessner v. Board of Health, 53 N. J. Law, 594. let it be entered: Action Dismissed.
Cited 31 timesPublishedPhillips v. Interstate Land Co.
176 N.C. 514 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 1918
Brown, J. This action is brought to recover on the following note: $2,000. Laurinburg, N. C., September 25, 1911. January 10, 1912, after date, we promise to pay to the order of M. M. … Watson v. Mfg. Co., 147 N. C., 475 ; Davis v. Ins. Co., 134 N. C., 60 ; Bank v. Oil Co., 157 N. C., 302 .
Cited 8 timesPublished259 N.C. 566 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 14, 1963
Brown v. Terhune (N.J.), 18 A. 2d 73 . The New Jersey procedure as set forth in Payne v. Borough of Sea Bright (N.J.), 187 A. 627 , is approved in Eastern Boulevard Corporation v. … Board of Adjustment, supra; Chambers v. Board of Adjustment, 250 N.C. 194 , 198, 108 S.E. 2d 211 ; Jarrell v. Board of Adjustment, 258 N.C. 476, 480 , 128 S.E. 2d 879 . The statute (G.S.
Cited 24 timesPublished142 N.C. 246 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1906
Boyce v. Anderson , 2 Pet., 150 . … Bernhardt v. Brown, supra .
Cited 16 timesPublishedDay v. Commissioners of Yadkin County
191 N.C. 780 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 19, 1926
Brodnax v. Groom, 64 N. C., 244 ; Gleen v. Comrs., 139 N. C., 413 ; Davenport v. Board of Education, 183 N. C., 570 ; Person v. Watts, 184 N. C., 499, 506 ; Lee v. Waynesville, ibid., 565; Parks v. Comrs., 186 N. … In Brown v. Comrs., 173 N.
Cited 13 timesPublished286 N.C. 41 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 26, 1974
In plain view was only a brown bottle containing pills. The bottle itself was not contraband. … See Coolidge v.
Cited 21 timesPublished
Ask Donna