Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.27s
Matthews v. Carolina Standard Corporation
232 N.C. 229 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 9, 1950
White's Service, Inc., 213 N.C. 148 , 195 S.E. 370 ; Wilson v. Mooresville, 222 N.C. 283 , 22 S.E. 2d 907 ; Brown v. Aluminum Co., 224 N.C. 766 , 32 S.E. 2d 320 ; Rewis v. Ins. Co., 226 N.C. 325 , 38 S.E. 2d 97 . … Plemmons v. White’s Service, Inc., supra. Howell v. Fuel Co., 226 N.C. 730 , 40 S.E. 2d 197 ; We do not regard the decisions in Brown v. Aluminum Co., 224 N.C. 766 , 32 S.E. 2d 320 ; Robbins v.
Cited 16 timesPublished241 N.C. 308 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1954
On the authority of Tyer, Administratrix, v. Lumber Co., 188 N.C. 274, 124 S.E. 306 , the judgment of the court below is Affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education of the Hickory Administrative School Unit v. Latta
343 N.C. 508 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 13, 1996
Cited 0 timesPublishedPage Trust Co. v. Carolina Construction Co.
191 N.C. 664 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1926
Noland Co. v. Trustees, supra; Warner v. Halyburton, supra; Ingold v. Hickory, supra; Scheflow v. Pierce, 176 N. C., 91 ; Hutchinson v. Comrs., 172 N. C., 844 ; Hall v. Jones, 151 N. C., 419 . … Brown v. Dail, 117 N. C., 41 ; Williams v. Chapman, 118 N. C., 943 ; Stott v. Franey, 23 A. S. R., 132, and note; 2 R. C. L., 599.
Cited 23 timesPublishedDavis v. Sgt. Peppers Restaurant and Bar, Inc.
362 N.C. 176 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 24, 2008
Cited 0 timesPublishedDemocratic Party of Guilford County v. Guilford County Board of Elections
342 N.C. 856 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1996
Blatt Co. v. Southwell, 259 N.C. 468 , 130 S.E.2d 859 (1963). … In Pinehurst, Inc. v. O’Leary Bros. Realty, 79 N.C. App. 51 , 338 S.E.2d 918 , disc. rev. denied, 316 N.C. 378 , 342 S.E.2d 896 (1986), and Leonard E. Warner, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp., 66 N.C.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBoard of Education of the Hickory Administrative School Unit v. Brittain
343 N.C. 507 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 13, 1996
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of School Trustees of Washington City Administrative Unit v. Benner
222 N.C. 566 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 24, 1943
“Said Board shall allow for the debt service fund the same per capita amount per pupil enrolled for the previous school year to the special charter district and districts voting bonds or borrowing from the County Board of … Hickory v. Catawba County, 206 N. C., 165 , 173 S. E., 56 ; Reeves v. Board of Education, 204 N. C., 74 , 167 S. E., 454 , where pertinent statutes are discussed.
Cited 3 timesPublishedWallace v. Town of North Wilkesboro
151 N.C. 614 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 8, 1910
BROWN, J. .This is a civil cause, duly instituted by the plaintiff against tbe defendant, town of North Wilkesboro. A temporary restraining order was issued in said cause by W. R. … Pickler v. Board of Education, 149 N. C., p. 223. In this case, Clark, G. J., says: “Pending this appeal, the new schoolhouse bas doubtless been built. If that appeared, we would not decide.an abstract question.”
Cited 12 timesPublished253 N.C. 580 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 20, 1961
.); Goff v. Savage, 210 P. 374 (Wash.); De La Ysla v. Publix Theatres Corporation, 26 P. 2d 818 (Utah); Brown v. Meyer Sanitary Milk Co., 96 P. 2d 651 (Kan.); Horn v. Illinois Cent. R. … In S. v.
Vacated on other grounds by Davidson v. LaVallee, 371 U.S. 24 (1962)Cited 15 timesPublishedCoble v. Commissioners of Guilford County
184 N.C. 342 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 1922
The act construed in Brown v. Comrs., 173 N. C., 600, was obviously intended to create a taxing district for road purposes, and the power of the Legislature to enact it was upheld. This case was affirmed in Mills v. … C., 215 ; Parvin v. Comrs., 177 N. C., 508 ; Comrs. v. Pruden, 178 N. C., 394 ; Martin County v. Bank, 178 N. C., 26 ; Comrs. v. Bank, 178 N. C., 170 . See, also, Board of Trustees v. Webb, 155 N. C., 379 .
Cited 13 timesPublished213 N.C. 198 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 2, 1938
S. v. Purify, 86 N. C., 681 ; Warlick v. Lowman, 103 N. C., 122 , 9 S. E., 458 ; Barber v. Griffin, 158 N. C., 348 , 74 S. E., 110 ; S. v. Haynie, 169 N. C., 277 , 84 S. E., 385 . … E., 753 ; Lexington v. Lopp, 210 N. C., 196 , 185 S. E., 766 ; Simon v. Craft, 182 U. S., 427 ; Truax v. Corrigan, 257 U. S., 312 . *202 In Cook v. Vickers, 144 N. C., 312 , 57 S. E., 1 , cited with approval in Brown v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedState to the Use of the Board of Education v. . Moody
74 N.C. 77 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876
Cited 0 timesPublishedDuggins v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT EXAMINERS
287 N.C. 258 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 1975
DUGGINS, Jr. v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT EXAMINERS. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 6, 1975. Henson, Donahue & Elrod, for plaintiff. Allen, Steed & Pullen, for defendant.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBoard of Managers of the James Walker Memorial Hospital v. City of Wilmington
237 N.C. 179 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1953
In Board of Health v. … See also Burleson v. Board of Aldermen, 200 N.C. 30 , 156 S.E. 241 . In Palmer v.
Cited 40 timesPublishedCity of Raleigh v. North Carolina Railroad
129 N.C. 265 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 26, 1901
Tbe point now raised has been recently and fully discussed and determined in Brown v. Louisburg, 126 N.C., 701 , 18 Am., St. Rep., 611. … Tbe point that tbe defendant is liable for tbe acts of its. lessee is settled by Aycock v. Railroad, 89 N. C., 330 ; Logan v. Railroad, 116 N. C., 940 , and a dozen or more cases affirming tbe same.
Cited 11 timesPublished205 N.C. 417 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 22, 1933
Bank v. Bank, 197 N. C., 526 , 150 S. E., 34 , Bailey v. Hassell, 184 N. C., 450 , 115 S. E., 166 , Potato Co. v. Jeanette, 174 N. C., 236 , 93 S. E., 795 , Power Co. v. Power Co., 171 N. C., 248 , 88 S. … In Welfare v. Thompson, 83 N.
Cited 6 timesPublished73 N.C. 609 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1875
Snider v. Sackenhour, 2 Ired Fq., 360. Ellington v. Currie, 5 Ired. Eq., 21 . … Thompson v. Marker, 2 Jones, Eq. 475, and Shoffner v. Fogleman, 1 Winst. Eq. 12.
Cited 4 timesPublished98 N.C. 343 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1887
(Perry v. Whitaker , 71 N.C. 475 ; Southerland v. Goldsboro , 96 N.C. 49 ; Duke v. Brown, ibid. , 127; McDowell v. Construction Co., ibid. , 514, and Wood v. Oxford , 97 N.C. 227 , cited.) … Southerland v. Goldsboro , 96 N.C. 49 ; Duke v. Brown, ibid. , 127; McDowell v. The Construction Co., ibid. , 514; Wood v. Oxford , 97 N.C. 227 . The registration of voters is essential and very important.
Cited 6 timesPublished235 N.C. 643 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 11, 1952
Hoover v. Crotts, 232 N.C. 617 , 61 S.E.2d 705 ; Wike v. Board of Trustees of New Bern Graded Schools, 229 N.C. 370 , 49 S.E. 2d 740 ; Carroll v. Brown, 228 N.C. 636 , 46 S.E.2d 715 ; Smith v. … Hoover v. Crotts, supra; Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. Roberts, 230 N.C. 654 , 55 S.E.2d 85 ; Brown v. Moore, 229 N.C. 406 , 50 S.E.2d 5 ; Wike v. Board of Trustees of New Bern Graded Schools, supra; Carroll v.
Cited 68 timesPublished
Ask Donna