Case law

Commissioners v. . Commissioners

70 N.C. 656 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1874

The question in this case is the same as in Steele v. Commissioners , ante 137, at this term, and the decision is the same, and for the same reason. … The Board of Commissioners of a county must be sued in the county of which they are Commissioners. There is no error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

Osborne v. Town of North Wilkesboro Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners

280 N.C. 696 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1972

Irwin v. Charlotte, 193 N.C. 109 , 136 *700 S.E. 368; Sugg v. Greenville, 169 N.C. 606 , 86 S.E. 695 ; Salisbury v. Barnhardt, 249 N.C. 549 , 107 S.E. 2d 297 ; Steadman v. Pinetops, 251 N.C. 509 , 112 S.E. 2d 102 .

Plott v. . Comrs.

187 N.C. 125 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 22, 1924

Jones v. Boyd , 80 N.C. 258 ; Evans v. R. R. , R. R., 96 N.C. 47 ; Burns v. McFarland , 146 N.C. 382 ; Davenport v. Comrs. , 163 N.C. 147 ; Peters v. Highway Com. , 184 N.C. 30 ; School Com. v. … Newsome v. Earnheart, supra; DeBerry v. Nicholson, supra; Roberts v. Calvert , 98 N.C. 581 ; Hampton v. Waldrop , 104 N.C. 453 ; Quinn v. Lattimore , 120 N.C. 426 ; Hendersonville v. Jordan , 150 N.C. 35 ; Gibson v.

Page Trust Co. v. Carolina Construction Co.

191 N.C. 664 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1926

Noland Co. v. Trustees, supra; Warner v. Halyburton, supra; Ingold v. Hickory, supra; Scheflow v. Pierce, 176 N. C., 91 ; Hutchinson v. Comrs., 172 N. C., 844 ; Hall v. Jones, 151 N. C., 419 . … Brown v. Dail, 117 N. C., 41 ; Williams v. Chapman, 118 N. C., 943 ; Stott v. Franey, 23 A. S. R., 132, and note; 2 R. C. L., 599.

Powell v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

178 N.C. 243 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 15, 1919

Bennett v. R. R., 170 N. C., 389 ; Brown v. Electric Co., 138 N. C., 534 ; White v. R. R., 113 N. C., 610; Midland Co. v. Williams, 92 Ala., 277 ; Threader v. … And in Brown v. Electric Co., supra, it was held that: “1.

Sneed v. . Bullock

77 N.C. 282 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1877

.- During a session of the Superior Court, the defendant presents his credentials from the Board of ■County Commissioners, showing that he has been qualified and inducted into the office of Sheriff, so far as said Board • … Patterson v. Hubbs, 65 N. C. 119 ; Brown v. Turner, 70 N. C. 93 . Per Cukiam. Appeal dismissed.

Osborne v. Board of Education of Guilford County Ex Rel. State

207 N.C. 503 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 1, 1935

Moses v. Major, 201 N. C., 613 . … Hyman v. Jones, 205 N. C., 266 , 171 S. E., 103 . The facts in the case at bar disclose that the judgment against Lethco was duly docketed on 15 September, 1924.

Dockery v. Town of Hamlet

162 N.C. 118 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 30, 1913

, including retainer for two years, drafting ordinances, etc., attending several meetings of the board of commissioners, including retainer for two civil suits, McLean and Napier v. … The language above cited is quoted and approved in Royster v. Commissioners, 98 N. C., 151 . In Board of Education v. Greenville, 132 N.

Finch v. North Carolina Railroad

195 N.C. 190 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 22, 1928

Johnson v. R. R., 163 N. C., 431 ; Brown v. R. R., 171 N. C., 266 ; Goff v. R. R., 179 N. C., 216 ; Dudley v. R. R., 180 N. C., 34 ; Perry v. R. R., ibid., p. 290; Blum v. R. R., 187 N. C., 640 ; Rigsbee v. R. … Barber v. R. R., supra, and cases cited.

Goodman v. . White

174 N.C. 399 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 24, 1917

This subject is fully discussed in Hobgood v. Ehlen, 141 N. … In fact, there is no evidence there was a board of directors, although we assume there was. But who constituted the board?

Covington v. . Newberger

99 N.C. 523 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1888

C., 101 , and Bentley v. Doggett, 37 Am. Reps., 827. … Brown v. Kinsey, 81 N. C., 245 ; Best v. Frederick, 84 N. C., 176 ; State v. White, 89 N. C., 462 ; State v. Powell, 94 N. C., 965 , and cases cited. There is error, and the defendant is entitled to a new trial.

Matthews v. Carolina Standard Corporation

232 N.C. 229 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 9, 1950

White's Service, Inc., 213 N.C. 148 , 195 S.E. 370 ; Wilson v. Mooresville, 222 N.C. 283 , 22 S.E. 2d 907 ; Brown v. Aluminum Co., 224 N.C. 766 , 32 S.E. 2d 320 ; Rewis v. Ins. Co., 226 N.C. 325 , 38 S.E. 2d 97 . … Plemmons v. White’s Service, Inc., supra. Howell v. Fuel Co., 226 N.C. 730 , 40 S.E. 2d 197 ; We do not regard the decisions in Brown v. Aluminum Co., 224 N.C. 766 , 32 S.E. 2d 320 ; Robbins v.

Smith v. Town of Belhaven

150 N.C. 156 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 17, 1909

Brown, J. The record discloses these material facts, as admitted by the parties. … Tbe question presented has been fully determined and discussed in tbe case of Lumberton v. Nuveen, 144 N. C., 303 , where tbe authorities are collected. We are of opinion that tbe proposed bond issue is valid.

Craven County v. . Parker

194 N.C. 561 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 16, 1927

It would seem to follow that in a suit to foreclose the certificate, the decision in Sanders v. Earp, 118 N. C., 275 , and Geer v. Brown, 126 N. … Stanley v. Baird, 118 N. C., 75 ; Geer v. Brown, supra; Cherokee v. McClelland, 179 N. C., 127, 132 .

State v. . Kelly

186 N.C. 365 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 31, 1923

In Brown v. Commissioners, 173 N. … In Brown v.

Town of Old Fort v. Harmon

219 N.C. 245 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1941

Tate, one of the members of the Board of Aldermen of the plaintiff with themselves, Chief of Police of the plaintiff,” that from 1 May, 1935, to 1 May, 1937, said Tate, member of said board, “received from the funds of the … Brown v. Walker, 188 N. C., 52 , 123 S. E., 633 ; 19 R. C. L., 1142; 43 C. J., 718.”

Riddick v. Richmond Cedar Works

227 N.C. 647 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 17, 1947

In compliance, the claimant, in the absence of the regular sawyer, undertook to assist another employee in cutting off a board. … Brown v. Aluminum Co., 224 N. C., 766 , 32 S. E. (2d), 320 . He was doing “some work” in the vicinity of one of the saws, pursuant to instructions from his superior. This suffices to repel the motion to dismiss.

Democratic Party of Guilford County v. Guilford County Board of Elections

342 N.C. 856 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1996

Blatt Co. v. Southwell, 259 N.C. 468 , 130 S.E.2d 859 (1963). … In Pinehurst, Inc. v. O’Leary Bros. Realty, 79 N.C. App. 51 , 338 S.E.2d 918 , disc. rev. denied, 316 N.C. 378 , 342 S.E.2d 896 (1986), and Leonard E. Warner, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp., 66 N.C.

Moffitt v. . Davis

205 N.C. 565 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 10, 1934

See Hudson v. McArthur , 152 N.C. 445 , and dissenting opinion by Brown, J. , concurred in by Walker, J . In Fore v. … Hipp v. Farrell , 173 N.C. 167 ; Brown v. R. R. , 188 N.C. 52 ; Noland v. Trustees , 190 N.C. 250 . In the Fore case, supra , the violation of the particular act is made a misdemeanor.

Board of School Trustees of Washington City Administrative Unit v. Benner

222 N.C. 566 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 24, 1943

“Said Board shall allow for the debt service fund the same per capita amount per pupil enrolled for the previous school year to the special charter district and districts voting bonds or borrowing from the County Board of … Hickory v. Catawba County, 206 N. C., 165 , 173 S. E., 56 ; Reeves v. Board of Education, 204 N. C., 74 , 167 S. E., 454 , where pertinent statutes are discussed.