Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

1.25s

  • King v. Arthur

    245 N.C. 599 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 1957

    Co. v. Tucker, 127 Ohio St. 421 , 188 N.E. 870 ; Neudeck v. Ford Motor Co., 249 Mich. 690 , 229 N.W. 438 ; Smith v. Brown Paper Mill Co., La. App., 152 So. 700 ; Texas Employers Insurance Assn. v. Mitchell (Tex. Civ. … Neudeck v. Ford Motor Co., 249 Mich. 690 , 229 N.W. 438 ; Spicer Mfg. Co. v. Tucker, 127 Ohio St. 421 , 188 N.E. 870 ; Smith v. Brown Paper Mill Co., La. App., 152 So. 700 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • NC Dept. of Correction v. NC MEDICAL BD.

    675 S.E.2d 641 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 2009

    FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Brown v. … In Brown v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Efird v. City of Winston-Salem

    199 N.C. 33 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1930

    S., 2703; Brown v. Hillsboro, 185 N. C., 368 ; Gunter v. Sanford, 186 N. C., 452 ; Leak v. Wadesboro, 186 N. C., 683 ; Vester v. Nashville, 190 N. C., 265 ; A. C. L. Ry. Co. v. Ahoskie, 192 N. C., 258 ; Mfg. Co. v. … Storm v. Wrightsville Beach, 189 N. C., at p. 683; Brown v. Hillsboro, 185 N. C., 377 ; Holton v. Mocksville, 189 N. C., 145 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Dusenberry v. Dusenberry

    314 N.C. 608 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1985

    Wade v. Wade, 72 N.C. App. 372 , 325 S.E. 2d 260 (1984), disc. rev. denied, 313 N.C. 612 , 330 S.E. 2d 616 (1985); Smith v. Smith, 71 N.C. App. 242 , 322 S.E. 2d 393 (1984); and Hinton v. Hinton, 70 N.C. … In the meantime, we allowed plaintiffs petition in Smith v. Smith, one of the cases relied upon by the Court of Appeals in its decision in the case now before us. In Smith v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of the Hickory Administrative School Unit v. Seagle

    343 N.C. 509 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 13, 1996

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Freeman v. Ponder

    234 N.C. 294 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 31, 1951

    Brown, M. J. Clark, H. M. Roberts, Mrs. H. M. Roberts, H. C. Vaughn, B. M. West, and John West, whose names appeared on the registration book of that precinct; testimony showing that J. B. *306 Austin, A. J. Brown, Mrs. … Brown, Ray Brown, H. E. Carter, P. V. Carter, Lawrence Hagan, Minton Robinson, and Mrs.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Bynum v. . Turner

    171 N.C. 86 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 1, 1916

    BRowN, J. Tbe plaintiff, witb others, was convicted in tbe local criminal court of the crime of gambling, tbe defendant Turner being tbe trial justice, and a fine of $200 was imposed. … v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen of Chapel Hill

    286 N.C. 170 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 26, 1974

    The use of any of these factors before the Board under the circumstances disclosed was in direct violation of our decision in Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, supra. Jackson v. … Board of Adjustment, 275 N.C. 155 , 166 S.E. 2d 78 ; Craver v. Board of Adjustment, 267 N.C. 40 , 147 S.E. 2d 599 ; Jarrell v. Board of Adjustment, 258 N.C. 476 , 128 S.E. 2d 879 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Burke County Public Schools Board of Education v. Juno Construction Corp.

    304 N.C. 187 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1981

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Williams v. . Williams

    188 N.C. 728 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1924

    Froelich v. Express Co., 67 N. C., 1 ; Moore v. Nowell, 94 N. C., 266 ; Brantley v. Finch, 97 N. C., 92 ; Bowers v. R. R., 107 N. C., 721 ; Knight v. Taylor, 131 N. C., 84 ; Teal v. Templeton, 149 N. C., 32 ; Petree v. … C., 437 ; Brown v. Taylor, 174 N. C., 423 ; Shoe Store Co. v. Wiseman, ibid., 716.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • State v. Wilson

    262 N.C. 419 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 10, 1964

    Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 466-474 . … Brown v. Allen, supra.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Lamar Oci South Corporation v. Stanly County Zoning Board of Adjustment

    362 N.C. 670 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 2008

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Weston v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.

    169 N.C. 398 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 29, 1915

    In Barrow v. … Cited: Propst v. Caldwell , 172 N.C. 597 ; Olds v. Cedar Works , 173 N.C. 161 , 163 , 167 ; Hutton v. Horton , 178 N.C. 551 ; Cedar Works v. Shepard , 181 N.C. 17 . *Page 474

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • School Committee of Seventy-First Consolidated School District v. Board of Education

    186 N.C. 643 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1923

    In Venable v. School Committee, 149 N. … Peters v. *648 Highway Com., 184 N. C., 30 ; Person v. Watts, 184 N. C., 506 ; Davenport v. Board of Education, 183 N. C., 570 ; Dula v. School Trustees, 177 N. C., 426 ; Newton v. School Committee, 158 N.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Barker v. Palmer

    217 N.C. 519 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1940

    Spain v. Hines, 214 N. C., 432 (437). In The People ex rel. Lemon v. Elmore, 256 N. … Durham v. Cotton Mills, 141 N. C., 615 ; Shelby v. Power Co., 155 N. C., 196 ; Reed v. Engineering Co., 188 N. C., 39 .” New trial.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Trustees of the Normal School v. State Board of Education

    166 N.C. 462 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1914

    Moore, trustee and secretary, applied for aid to tbe State Board of Education through its local board of managers in Elizabeth City. … Bowers v. Lumber Co., 152 N. C., 604 and 607; Rollins v. Ebbs, 138 N. C., 140 ; R. R. v. Kitchen, 91 N. C., 39 ; Dair v. United States, 83 U. S., 1 ; Butler v. U. S., 88 U. S., 272 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bryant v. North Carolina State Board of Examiners of Electrical Contractors

    338 N.C. 288 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1994

    The Court of Appeals relied on its decision in Carter v. N.C. State Bd. for Professional Engineers, 86 N.C. … Cobey v. Simpson, 333 N.C. 81, 90 , 423 S.E.2d 759, 763 (1992). Accordingly, we hold that plaintiff is entitled to a hearing and decision from the Board on the charges.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lamar Oci South Corporation v. Stanly County Zoning Board of Adjustment

    669 S.E.2d 322 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Baker v. NC Psychology Bd.

    822 S.E.2d 303 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 23, 2019

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Price v. . Pyatt

    203 N.C. 799 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 4, 1933

    In re Will of Brown, ante, 347. Testimony of a similar nature was held incompetent in the following-cases : Pulliam v. Hege, 192 N. C., 459 , 135 S. E., 288 (“I had to wait on her; ‘tote’ meals to her”) ; Knight v. … E., 779 (Feme plaintiff “gave deceased medicine, kept him clean and cared for him generally; he was helpless; we had to do all the services and wait on him”) ; Brown v. Adams, 174 N. C., 490 , 93 S.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.