Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

2.09s

  • N. C. Monroe Construction Co. v. Guilford County Board of Education

    278 N.C. 633 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 12, 1971

    In Morganton v. … In Brewer v. Brasted, 11 Pa. D & C 103, a contract for the erection of a school building was alleged to be invalid because the school board was not legally constituted.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Forsyth County Board of Social Services v. Division of Social Services

    317 N.C. 689 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 12, 1986

    Lackey v. Department of Human Resources, 306 N.C. 231, 235 , 293 S.E. 2d 171, 175 (1982). … Accord, Romano v. Perales, 110 A.D. 2d 1028 , 488 N.Y.S. 2d 316 (1985), aff’d, 67 N.Y. 2d 848 , 492 N.E. 2d *694 787, 501 N.Y.S. 2d 659 (1986) (per curiam). But see Cass County Welfare Department v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Davidson County Broadcasting, Inc. v. Rowan County Board of Commissioners

    666 S.E.2d 119 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 26, 2008

    666 S.E.2d 119 (2008) DAVIDSON COUNTY BROADCASTING, INC., and Richard and Dorcas Parker, Petitioners v. ROWAN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Respondent Mt. … Anthony Fox, Charlotte, for Board of Commissioners. Benjamin R. Sullivan, Charlotte, Benn A. Brewington, III, Raleigh, for Rowan Bd. Richard R. Reamer, Salisbury, for Preservation Society.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. . Chapman

    118 N.C. 943 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1896

    v. … The sale of the pins was valid, and the title vested in Chapman as they were made, just as the logs became subject to the lien upon the happening of the contingency in Brown v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Wynn v. TRUSTEES OF CHARLOTTE COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYS.

    255 N.C. 594 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 1961

    They contend such operation would be in violation of the 1954 and 1955 decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 , 98 L. … The decisions in the Brown case were considered and discussed by this Court in 1956 in Constantian v. Anson County, 244 N.C. 221 , 93 S.E.2d 163 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Herring v. Pugh

    126 N.C. 852 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 7, 1900

    Manufacturing Co. v. Buxton , 105 N.C. 76 ; Isler v. Brown , 69 N.C. 125 ; Ellison v. Raleigh , 89 N.C. 125 ; Green v. Griffin , 95 N.C. 52 . … State v. Sanvinet , 24 La. Ann., 119 ; Ex Parte Hickey , 4 Smed. and M. (Miss.), 751. Modified and affirmed. Cited: Moore v. Moore , 131 N.C. 372 ; Worth v. Trust Co. , 152 N.C. 246 ; In re Brown , 168 N.C. 424 .

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Newman v. . Comrs. of Vance

    208 N.C. 675 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1935

    Moore v. Bell , 191 N.C. 305 ; Wood v. Braswell , 192 N.C. 588 ; Yarborough v. N.C. Park Commission , 196 N.C. 284 . … George v. Hardie , 147 N.C. 88 (97).

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Duggins v. North Carolina State Board of Certified Public Accountant Examiners

    294 N.C. 120 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 24, 1978

    Moreover, this construction is the Board’s long-standing interpretation of G.S. 93-12(5) and is therefore entitled to “great consideration.” MacPherson v. … Martin v. Walton, 368 U.S. 25 , 82 S.Ct. 1 , 7 L.Ed. 2d 5 (1961) (per curiam); Phelps v. Board of Education, 300 U.S. 319 , 57 S.Ct. 483 , 81 L.Ed. 674 (1937).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Ragsdale v. Kennedy

    286 N.C. 130 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 26, 1974

    Defendant Brown had been a stockholder since incorporation and was a member of the board of directors when the transaction took place. The other defendants became stockholders and board members on 6 June 1972. … Brown, 196 N.C. 685 , 146 S.E. 803 (1929).

    Cited 424 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. First National Bank of Snow Hill

    194 N.C. 475 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 9, 1927

    And in Davis v. Elmira Bank, 161 U. S., 275 , 40 Law Ed., 700, Mr. … It was so held in McDonald v. Thompson, 184 U.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Learning center/ogden School, Inc. v. Cherokee County Board of Education

    365 N.C. 547 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 26, 2012

    720 S.E.2d 671 (2012) LEARNING CENTER/OGDEN SCHOOL, INC., d/b/a The Learning Center Charter School v. CHEROKEE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, d/b/a Cherokee County Schools. No. 493P11. Supreme Court of North Carolina. … Campbell, for Cherokee County Board of Education. Richard A Vinroot, Charlotte, for Learning Center/Ogden School, Inc.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Yale Jewelry Co. v. Joyner

    159 N.C. 644 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 1912

    Brown, J. -The plaintiff shipped to the defendant a “pull board,” together with a quantity of jewelry, razors, etc., on consignment, under a contract by which the title to all the property remained in the plaintiff. … It is unnecessary more particularly to describe the pull board ‘ or to discuss the question as to whether its operation constitutes a lottery or gambling scheme within the definition given in S. v. Perry, 154 N.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Meyer v. Walls

    347 N.C. 97 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1997

    The State contributes to the school fund, but the local boards select and hire the teachers, other employees and operating personnel. The local boards run the schools. Turner v. … Brown-Graham and Jeffrey S.

    Cited 263 timesPublished
  • Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.

    321 N.C. 298 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 2, 1987

    362 S.E.2d 782 (1987) 321 N.C. 298 The ROWAN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, a Public Body Politic v. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO. No. 548P87. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 2, 1987.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • J. Lampros Wholesale, Inc. v. North Carolina Board of Alcoholic Control

    265 N.C. 679 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1965

    The Board’s findings are conclusive if supported by material and substantial evidence. Campbell v. ABC *682 Board, 263 N.C. 224 , 139 S.E. 2d 197 ; Thomas v. ABC Board, 258 N.C. 513 , 128 S.E. 2d 884 ; Sinodis v. … “Hence it is that the findings of the Board, when made in good faith and supported by evidence, are final.” Freeman v. ABC Board, supra.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Durham City Board of Education v. National Union Fire Ins.

    333 N.C. 790 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1993

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Hill v. Ponder

    221 N.C. 58 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 4, 1942

    McGuinn v. High Point, 219 N. C., 56 , 13 S. E., (2d), 48; Freeman v. Comrs., supra; S. v. Jennette, 190 N. C., 96 , 129 S. E., 184 ; Comrs. v. Bank, 181 N. C., 347 , 107 S. E., 245 ; Jones v. … It was found' by the jury that Buckner, Brown and Freeman were duly qualified chairmen of their respective boards, and that Teague, who had theretofore been chairman of the County Highway Commission was disqualified by his

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In Re Osborne

    205 N.C. 716 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 24, 1934

    Ring v. Whitman, 194 N. C., 544 ; In re Chase, 195 N. C., 143 ; S. c., 193 N. C., 450 ; Bonnett-Brown Corporation v. Coble, 195 N. C., 491 . The respondent, Mrs. Anna Harrell, relies on the case of Truelove v. … Brown v. Brown, 101 Ind. R., 340; Van Metre v. Sankey, 39 Am. St. R., 197 .”

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Claybrook v. Commissioners

    114 N.C. 453 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1894

    The exception as to issue or violation of constitutional provisions is expressly stated in Duke v. Brown, 96 N. C., 127 , and in Railroad v. Commissioners, 109 N C., 159. … Southerland v. Goldsboro, 96 N. C., 49 , and Duke v. Brown, supra. It does not appear that the ballots used did not follow the exact requirements of the statute.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Ginsberg v. Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina

    366 N.C. 230 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 13, 2012

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.