Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.37s
Rowland v. Board of Elections of Vance County
184 N.C. 78 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1922
No power of review, or other judicial authority, in primary elections, has been lodged in the county boards of elections. This question was discussed by Hoke, J., in Brown v. Costen, 176 N. … Moore v. Jones, 76 N.
Cited 1 timesPublishedGates School District Committee v. Board of Education
235 N.C. 212 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1952
In tbe case of Board of Education v. … Perry v. Comrs., supra; Bivens v. Board of Education, supra. The consolidation complained of herein, however, does not involve a tax.
Cited 2 timesPublished284 N.C. 375 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1973
Lutz v. Board of Education, 282 N.C. 208 , 192 S.E. 2d 463 ; Utilities Commission v. Electric Membership Corp., 275 N.C. 250 , 166 S.E. 2d 663 ; Pipeline Co. v. … McIntyre v. Clarkson, 254 N.C. 510 , 119 S.E. 2d 888 ; Lassiter v. Board of Elections, 248 N.C. 102 , 102 S.E. 2d 853 , affirmed 360 U.S. 45 , 79 S.Ct. 985 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 1072 .
Cited 46 timesPublishedMaley v. Thomasville Furniture Co.
214 N.C. 589 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 4, 1939
Reed v. Lavender Bros., 206 N. C., 898 , 172 S. E., 877 ; Perdue v. State Board of Equalization, 205 N. C., 730 , 172 S. E., 396 . … Brown v. Ice Co., supra; Johnson v. Bagging Co., supra; Perdue v. State Board of Equalization, supra. In this connection it may be proper to say that the second headnote in Brown v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedN.C. State Board of Education v. N.C. Learns, Inc.
367 N.C. 515 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 19, 2014
Cited 0 timesPublishedBest v. N.C. State Board of Dental Examiners
333 N.C. 461 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 11, 1993
Cited 0 timesPublishedTobe-Williams v. New Hanover County Board of Education
367 N.C. 245 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 2013
Cited 0 timesPublishedMorris v. Board of Commissioners of Henderson County
184 N.C. 549 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1922
The plaintiffs are citizens and taxpayers of Henderson County, and the defendants are the board of county commissioners, "W. P. Bane, chairman, G. B. Hill, and John T. … Staton, members of said board, the board of road trustees, "W. P. Bane, chairman, E. A. Bly, and W. W. "Wilfong, members of said board, and the Citizens National Bank, treasurer of Henderson County.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Commissioners v. C. W. McNear & Co.
186 N.C. 352 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 31, 1923
Cited 0 timesPublishedChapman-Hunt Co. v. Haywood County Board of Education
198 N.C. 111 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1929
Bank v. Broom Co., 188 N. C., 508 , 125 S. E., 12 ; Holler v. Tel. Co., 149 N. C., 336 , 63 S. E., 92 ; Strauss v. Wilmington, 129 N. C., 99 , 39 S. E., 772 ; Tucker v. Satterthwaite, 120 N. C., 118 , 27 S. E., 45 . … McAdoo v. R. R., 105 N. C., 140 , 11 S. E., 316 ; Emery v. R. R., 102 N. C., 209 , 9 S. E., 139 . New trial.
Cited 7 timesPublished83 N.C. 258 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1880
Morehead v. Winston, 73 N. C., 398 ; Parker v. Shuford, 76 N. C. 219 . 2. The charge given is unexceptionable and the law properly declared by the court. … Bynum v. Bynum, 11 Ired., 632 ; Avery v. Stephenson, 12 Ired., 34 ; Jones v. Bunker, at this term. The judgment must therefore be affirmed and it is so ordered. No error. Affirmed.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJudd v. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF NORTH CAROLINA
723 S.E.2d 541 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 2012
723 S.E.2d 541 (2012) Keith Russell JUDD v. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF NORTH CAROLINA, Secretary of State of North Carolina, and State of North Carolina. No. 526P11. Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 8, 2012.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Department of Correction v. North Carolina Medical Board
363 N.C. 189 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 2009
Accordingly, we affirm the order of the trial court. *192 FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Brown v. … In Brown v.
Cited 77 timesPublishedBunch v. North Carolina Code Officials Qualifications Board
343 N.C. 97 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 4, 1996
Stagaard with the North Carolina Code Officials Qualifications Board (“Board”). … Bunch v. N.C. Code Off’Is Qualifications Bd., 119 N.C. App. 293 , 458 S.E.2d 248 (1995).
Cited 1 timesPublishedBurgin v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
214 N.C. 324 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 19, 1938
In the opinion in this case filed 21 September, 1938, it was said: “The fact that after the returns are in the State Board of Elections is to canvass the returns and determine whom they ascertain and declare by the count … It was further stated in the opinion: “Plaintiff is entitled to a stay until final returns have been received by the State Board of Elections from the county boards of Richmond and Davidson counties and to await the result
Cited 1 timesPublishedGasper v. Board of Trustees of Halifax Community College
366 N.C. 387 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 4, 2012
Cited 0 timesPublishedMitchell v. Board of Education of Haywood County
201 N.C. 55 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1931
of trustees thereof, and in the case of a local tax district, to the county board of education for the use of the district, but it shall nevertheless be the duty of all boards and bodies holding any such property to convey … Greensboro v. Simpson, 188 N. C., 737 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedHutton v. Board of Commissioners of Burke County
59 L.R.A. 33 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 14, 1900
The learned counsel for the defendant is mistaken in supposing that *Page 583 we overlooked the case of Commissioners v. Lumber Co. , 116 N.C. 731 , to which we presume he refers.
Cited 1 timesPublishedEmporia Concrete & Construction Co. v. Board of Commissioners
160 N.C. 303 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1912
Plaintiff’s counsel relied on Burgin v. Smith, 151 N. C., 561 ; McDonald v. McArthur, 154 N. C., 122 ; Sweet v. Morrison, 116 N. J., 19; Condon v. … A contract similar, in substantial respects, to the one upon which this suit is based, was considered and construed in O’Brien v. Mayor of New York, 139 N.
Cited 1 timesPublished249 N.C. 447 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 1959
Solon Lodge v. Ionic Lodge, 245 N.C. 281 , 95 S.E. 2d 921 ; Grimes v. Beaufort County, 218 N.C. 164 , 10 S.E. 2d 640 ; Brown v. Clement Co., 217 N.C. 47 , 6 S.E. 2d 842 . … Blanton, 157 N.C. 320 , 72 S.E. 1070 . ' To meet this burden plaintiff sought to show by the witness Brown that the land in controversy was within the boundaries set out in the deed from the State Board of Education to Hammer
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna