Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

1.02s

  • Lea Co. v. North Carolina Board of Transportation

    323 N.C. 691 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 4, 1989

    Our decision in the companion case is rendered this date and is reported as Lea Co. v. N. C. Board of Transportation, 323 N.C. 697 , 374 S.E. 2d 866 (1989). … Watkins v. Hellings, 321 N.C. 78 , 361 S.E. 2d 568 (1987).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Wake Cares, Inc. v. Wake County School Board

    655 S.E.2d 403 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 2007

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners

    299 N.C. 620 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 1, 1980

    Humble Oil & Refining, supra at 468, 202 S.E. 2d at 136 , citing Jackson v. Board of Adjustment, 275 N.C. 155 , 166 S.E. 2d 78 (1969); Utilities Commission v. Tank Line, 259 N.C. 363 , 130 S.E. 2d 663 (1963). … Such is the function of the town board. Humble Oil & Refining, supra; Lee v. Board of Adjustment, supra; In re Pine Hill Cemeteries, supra.

    Cited 241 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

    210 N.C. 825 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1936

    Hayes v. Hickory, 208 N. C., 845 , and cases there cited. Affirmed. ClaricsoN, J., not sitting.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • English Mica Co. v. Avery County Board of Education

    246 N.C. 714 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1957

    such board is the governing board, and which driver was at the time of such alleged negligent act or omission operating a public school bus in the course of his employment by such administrative unit or such board.” … Moore v. Superior Stone Co., 242 N.C. 647 , 89 S.E. 2d 253 ; McCraw v. Calvine *717 Mills, Inc., 233 N.C. 524 , 64 S.E. 2d 658 ; Gabriel v. Town of Newton, 227 N.C. 314 , 42 S.E. 2d 96 ; Creighton v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Rowell v. STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF PLUMBING

    652 S.E.2d 652 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 2007

    652 S.E.2d 652 (2007) Harold Wayne ROWELL v. STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF PLUMBING, HEATING AND FIRE SPRINKLER CONTRACTORS. No. 351P07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. October 11, 2007. Harold Wayne Rowell, pro se. … Fountain, Raleigh, for Board of Examiners.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rowell v. State Board of Examiners of Plumbing

    652 S.E.2d 652 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 2007

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Calabria v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

    640 S.E.2d 61 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 2006

    640 S.E.2d 61 (2006) Ann Marie CALABRIA, Plaintiff v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, et al Defendants, and Robin Hudson, Defendant, Intervenor. No. 625P06. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 19, 2006.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sanitary District v. . Prudden

    195 N.C. 722 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1928

    Appellants cite Browning v. Hooper, 269 U. S., 369 . … In the Browning case, it did not.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Capital Outdoor, Inc. v. Guilford County Board of Adjustment

    355 N.C. 269 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 7, 2002

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Red Springs City Board of Education v. McMillan

    250 N.C. 485 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 12, 1959

    And in Hutchins v. … Indeed, in Durham v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Richardson v. State

    368 N.C. 158 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 23, 2015

    For the reasons stated in Hart v. State, _ N.C. _, _, _ S.E.2d _, _ (2015) (372A14), the decision of the trial court is reversed. REVERSED. … Justice BEASLEY also dissents for the reasons stated in her dissenting opinion in Hart v. State, id. at _, _ S.E.2d at _.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Assell, Goetz & Moerlin, Inc.

    195 N.C. 719 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1928

    The Court’s decision is set forth in Comrs. v. Assell, 194 N. C., p. 412. … V, sec. 6, and the County Finance Act. The special approval has been given by the general act.” This was the sole question before the Court presented by the appeal.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Board of Medical Examiners v. Carroll

    194 N.C. 37 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 10, 1927

    Com. v. Mfg. Co,, 185 N. C., 17 . … Keaton v. Godfrey, 152 N. C., 16 ; Corp. Com. v. Mfg. Co., 185 N. C., p. 22.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Inman

    203 N.C. 542 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 23, 1932

    Fidelity Co. v. Fleming, 132 N. C., 332 , 43 S. E., 899 . … Realty Co. v. Charlotte, 198 N. C., 564 , 152 S. E., 686 . There is no error in the judgment that the plaintiffs respectively recover of the defendant, Eobert E.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Adams Ex Rel. Adams v. State Board of Education

    248 N.C. 506 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 4, 1958

    G.S. 143-293; Bradshaw v. Board of Education, 244 N.C. 393 , 93 S.E. 2d 434 . … Brewster v. Elizabeth City, 137 N.C. 392 , 49 S.E. 885 ; Construction Co. v. R. R., 184 N.C. 179 , 113 S.E. 672 ; Construction Co. v. R. R., 185 N.C. 43 , 116 S.E. 3 ; Davis v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners of Robeson County v. Malone

    179 N.C. 10 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1919

    Briggs v. Raleigh, 166 N. C., 153 . The same principle was applied and an issue of bonds sustained in Hill v. Skinner, 169 N.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Richardson v. State

    367 N.C. 779 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank of Durham

    213 N.C. 594 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 25, 1938

    Overman v. Sasser, 107 N. C., 432 , 12 S. E., 64 ; Belvin v. Paper Co., 123 N. C., 138 , 31 S. E., 655 ; Pritchard v. Steamboat Co., 169 N. C., 457 , 86 S. E., 171 ; Springs v. Refining Co., 205 N. C., 444 , 171 S. … Foote v. Gooch, supra. In S. v. Martin, 141 N. C., 832 , 53 S.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Forrest v. Pitt County Board of Education

    328 N.C. 327 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 7, 1991

    401 S.E.2d 366 (1991) 328 N.C. 327 Addie FORREST, Employee, Plaintiff, v. PITT COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Employer, Self-Insured, (State Board of Education), Defendants. No. 472A90. Supreme Court of North Carolina.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.