Opinion

Richardson v. State

368 N.C. 158
774 S.E.2d 304
2015 N.C. LEXIS 654

Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed: Jul 23, 2015
Status: Published
On the bench: Also, Beasley, Ervin, Her, Hudson, State, Stated
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in Hart v. State, _ N.C. _, _, _ S.E.2d _, _ (2015) (372A14), the decision of the trial court is reversed.

REVERSED.

Justice HUDSON, Justice BEASLEY, and Justice ERVIN dissent for the reasons stated in Justice Hudson’s dissenting opinion in Hart v. State, _ N.C. _, _, _ S.E.2d _, _ (2015) (372A14). Justice BEASLEY also dissents for the reasons stated in her dissenting opinion in Hart v. State, id. at _, _ S.E.2d at _.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.