Case law

Cooper v. Board of Commissioners of Franklin County

183 N.C. 231 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 29, 1922

In Gastonia v. … As suggested in Hotel Co. v.

Spry v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of Education

332 N.C. 661 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1992

Antonellis v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION

364 N.C. 608 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 4, 2010

ANTONELLIS v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION and Dr. William C. Harrison, Superintendent, Donna Weeks, Human Resources Jeff Jernigan, Principal. No. 398P10. Supreme Court of North Carolina. … Curry Gaskins, for Cumberland County Schools Board of Education, et al.

Ponder v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

233 N.C. 707 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 7, 1951

Warren v. A. C. L. R. R., 223 N.C. 843 , 28 S.E. 2d 505 . The facts alleged are not sufficient to attract the attention of a court of equity or to invoke its jurisdiction. Greenville v.

Board of Commissioners v. State Highway Commission

195 N.C. 26 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1928

Newton v. Highway Commission, 192 N. C., 54 ; S. c., 194 N. C., 159 ; S. c., ibid., 303; Smith v. Highway Commission, ibid., 333. … In Wentz v. Land Co., 193 N.

State v. Allred

275 N.C. 554 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1969

In Bank v. Oil Mills, 150 N.C. 683 , 64 S.E. 883 , and Peanut Growers Exchange v. … In accordance with our decisions in Oliphant v. R. R., supra, and in State v.

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Board of Education

204 N.C. 607 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1933

The cause was considered in Fidelity Co. v. Board of Education, 202 N. C., 354 , 162 S. E., 763 .

Davis v. Board of Commissioners

74 N.C. 374 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1876

In Poindexter v. Davis, 67 N. C. Rep. 112 , cited.by the plaintiff, the liability of the county was not involved ; but the liability of the present plaintiff, who was then defendant as surety of the county. … But if the board borrows money, either to support the poor or to build a church, and gives its bond, with A B as surety, then the surety is liable whether the board is or not. Apply these principles to our case.

Staunton Military Academy, Inc. v. Dockery

244 N.C. 427 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1956

Skinner v. Coward, 197 N.C. 466 , 149 S.E. 682 ; Barrett v. Barnes, 186 N.C. 154, 158 , 119 S.E. 194 ; Norman v. Hallsey, 132 N.C. 6 , 43 S.E. 473 . When adverse claims were asserted, defendant J. S. … Allgood v.

State v. Hill

331 N.C. 387 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 25, 1992

In California v. Brown, 479 U.S. 538 , 93 L. … State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40, 71 , 337 S.E.2d 808, 830 (1985), quoted in Lloyd, 321 N.C. at 327, 364 S.E.2d at 332 .

White Oak Properties, Inc. v. Town of Carrboro

313 N.C. 306 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1985

Brown left a copy of the petition for certiorari with the attorney for the Board. … Pierce v.

Tucker v. Mecklenburg County Zoning Board of Adjustment

356 N.C. 658 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 2003

Lamb v. Board of Education of Randolph County

235 N.C. 377 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1952

Branch v. Board of Education, 233 N.C. 623 , 65 S.E. 2d 124 . … Sanitary District v. Prudden, 195 N.C. 722 , 143 S.E. 530 ; Sams v. Board of Commissioners of Madison County, 217 N.C. 284 , 7 S.E. 2d 540 ; Board of Health of Nash County v.

Mitchell v. Board of Trustees of Township No. 8

71 N.C. 400 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874

Such; things must usually be left to the Board. If they are extravagant, the ballot-box is the appropriate remedy. … But the counsel on both sides had overlooked the fact that-the statute, supra, authorizing the Board to levy and collect taxes for necessary expenses has been repealed, and the Board is forbidden to levy and collect taxes

Lewis v. . Frye

207 N.C. 852 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1934

When this cause was considered by the Court upon a former appeal in Lewis v. Archbell, 199 N.

Wake Cares, Inc. v. Wake County School Board

655 S.E.2d 403 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 2007

WAKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and Lori Milberg, Horace J. … Tanner, Christine Scheef, Raleigh, for Wake School Board, et al.

Flanders v. Gabriel

335 N.C. 234 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 3, 1993

Watkins v. North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners

358 N.C. 190 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 2, 2004

The first issue presented is whether the Board was authorized, under Leahy v. … . *207 Faizan v. Grain Dealers Mut. Ins. Co., 254 N.C. 47, 57 , 118 S.E.2d 303, 310 (1961); see also Gill v. Board of Comm’rs of Wake Cty, 160 N.C. 176, 188 , 76 S.E. 203, 208 (1912).

Fox v. Board of Commissioners of County of Durham

244 N.C. 497 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 26, 1956

Newman v. Comrs. of Vance, supra, and cases cited; Hood, Comr. of Banks, v. Realty, Inc., supra; also, see Amick v. Lancaster, 228 N.C. 157 , 44 S.E. 2d 733 . … Turner v. Reidsville, 224 N.C. 42, 46 , 29 S.E. 2d 211 ; S. v. Lueders, 214 N.C. 558 , 200 S.E. 22 .

Campbell v. North Carolina State Board of Alcoholic Control

263 N.C. 224 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1964

However, the rules of evidence before administrative boards permit more latitude than is customary in court proceedings. … Blalock v. Durham, 244 N.C. 208 , 92 S.E. 2d 758 ; Gant v. Crouch, 243 N.C. 604 , 91 S.E. 2d 705 . In addition to the objections to the incompetency of evidence, the petitioner stressfully contends that Mr.