Opinion

Tucker v. Mecklenburg County Zoning Board of Adjustment

  • 356 N.C. 658
  • 576 S.E.2d 324
  • 2003 N.C. LEXIS 39
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Feb 28, 2003
Status
Published
Cited by
7 cases
Authority
More cited than 61.0%

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

As to the issue on direct appeal based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.