Case law

Bazemore v. Bertie County Board of Elections

254 N.C. 398 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 12, 1961

Its constitutionality was directly challenged in Lassiter v. Board of Elections, 248 N.C., 102 , 102 S.E. 2d 853 (1958). … Lassiter v. Northampton Election Bd., supra; Lane v. Wilson, 307 U.S. 268 ; Williams v. Mississippi, supra; Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 ; Davis v. Schnell, supra.

Joyner v. McDowell County Board of Education

244 N.C. 164 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 23, 1956

Perry v. Doub, 238 N.C. 233 , 77 S.E. 2d 711 ; Sellers v. Ins. Co., 233 N.C. 590 , 65 S.E. 2d 21 ; Erickson v. Starling, 233 N.C. 539 , 64 S.E. 2d 832 ; Teague v. … Oil Co., 232 N.C. 469 , 61 S.E. 2d 345 ; s.c. 232 N.C. 65 , 59 S.E. 2d 2 ; Moore County v. Burns, 224 N.C. 700 , 32 S.E. 2d 225 ; Wingler v. Miller, 221 N.C. 137 , 19 S.E. 2d 247 .

Hoke County Board of Education v. State

363 N.C. 653 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 2009

686 S.E.2d 515 (2009) HOKE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al, Plaintiffs and Asheville City Board of Education, et al, Plaintiff-Intervenors v. STATE of North Carolina; State Board of Education, Defendants. No. 354P09.

Hill v. Currituck Board of Comm.

639 S.E.2d 445 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 22, 2006

Chandler v. County Board of Education

181 N.C. 444 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1921

testator it was the duty of the school committee to use the farm and its rents for the school district, and not to keep up and maintain any particular school or schoolhouse, with the right, under the supervision of the board

Nc Board of Pharmacy v. Commission

635 S.E.2d 297 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 25, 2006

Mason v. Moore County Board of Commissioners

229 N.C. 626 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1948

C. 10 ; Spence v. Tapscott, 92 N. C. 576 ; McCoy v. Lassiter, 94 N. C. 131 ; Brooks v. Austin, 94 N. C. 222 ; Manufacturing Co. v. Simmons, 97 N. C. 89 ; Walton v. McKesson, supra; Howell v. Jones, 109 N. C. 102 ; R. … V, sec. 4; G.S. 153-92; Hallyburton v. Board of Education, 213 N. C. 9 , 195 S. E. 21 ; Gill v. Charlotte, 213 N. C. 160 , 195 S. E. 368 ; Sessions v. Columbus County, 214 N. C. 634 , 200 S. E. 418 ; Twining v.

Hill v. . Board of Aldermen of Charlotte

72 N.C. 55 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1875

Mears v. Commissioners of Wilmington , 9 Ire. 73. But in this case, it was evidently left to the discretion of the authorities, to determine from time to time, what ordinances were proper for the ends in view. … In Wilson v. the Mayor, c. , of N. Y., 1 Denio, 595 , the court say: "The civil remedy for misconduct in office is more restricted and depends exclusively upon the nature of the duty which has been violated.

Richmond & Danville Railroad v. Board of Commissioners

74 N.C. 506 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

The Board of Commissioners of Brunswick county, 72 N. C. … Wilmington Railroad Company v. Reid, 13. Wallace *510 264; Humphrey v. Piques 16, Wallace 243; Pacific Railroad Company v. Maguire 20, Wallace 36. The judgment of the Superior Courtis affirmed.

Nc Board of Pharmacy v. Commission

633 S.E.2d 463 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 1, 2006

Gilmore v. Hoke County Board of Education

222 N.C. 358 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1942

Brown last saw him, before he went to Duke, he was not complaining of his bladder trouble, and Dr. O’Briant did not treat him for it in his last illness. The cases of Williams v. Thompson, 200 N. C., 463 , 157 S. … “It is ours to construe the laws and not to make them,” Hoke, J., in S. v. Barksdale, 181 N. C., 621, 107 S. E., 505 ; Wilson v.

Nc Board of Pharmacy v. Commission

635 S.E.2d 425 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 8, 2006

Nc Board of Pharmacy v. Commission

633 S.E.2d 469 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 14, 2006

Nc Board of Pharmacy v. Commission

633 S.E.2d 100 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 30, 2006

Wilson v. . Board of Aldermen of Charlotte

74 N.C. 748 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

Pipkin v. … In Pullen v.

Johnson v. Harnett County Planning Board

360 N.C. 64 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 2005

Southerland v. Board of Aldermen of Goldsboro

96 N.C. 49 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1887

Co. v. Commissioners of Caldwell, 72 N. C., 486 , this clause was held, RodmaN, J., delivering the opinion, to require the majority vote to be of all those competent to vote, whether registered or not. In Harshman v. … This contrariety of decisions is noticed and commented on in Norment v. Charlotte, 85 N.

Nc Board of Pharmacy v. Commission

632 S.E.2d 168 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 26, 2006

Plaintiff (NC Board of Pharmacy) shall have up to and including the 22nd day of May 2006 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of April 2006."

Hoke County Board of Education v. State

358 N.C. 605 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 30, 2004

See Part V of this opinion. II. … Dist. v.

Greene v. Mitchell County Board of Education

237 N.C. 336 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 18, 1953

Parsons v. Swift & Co., 234 N.C. 580 , 68 S.E. 2d 296 ; Greene v. Spivey, 236 N.C. 435 ; In re Sams, 236 N.C. 228 . … Hawkins v. Simpson, 237 N.C. 155 ; Hughes v. Thayer, 229 N.C. 773 , 51 S.E. 2d 488 ; Sparks v. Willis, 228 N.C. 25 , 44 S.E. 2d 343 ; Edwards v. Cross, 233 N.C. 354 , 64 S.E. 2d 6 ; Yokeley v.