Case law

Board of Education v. Hood

204 N.C. 353 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1933

See, also, Morecock v. Hood, Comr., 202 N. C., 321 , 162 S. E., 730 . Nor do tbe facts constitute a preference upon tbe trust fund theory as interpreted in Parker v. Trust Co., 202 N. C., 230 , 162 S. … E., 564 ; Williams v. Hood, Comr., ante, 140. See, also, Flack v. Hood, Comr., ante, 337. Reversed.

Sams v. Board of County Commissioners

217 N.C. 284 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1940

Reed v. Madison County, 213 N. C., 145 , 195 S. E., 620 ; Borden v. Goldsboro, 173 N. C., 661 , 92 S. E., 694 . Tbe determination of tbe question presented by this appeal was foreshadowed by what was said in Freeman v. … II, sec. 29, and the persons named as members of the county board of health by this act were thus without power to perform any duty prescribed thereby. Freeman v. Comrs. of Madison County, supra.

Vass v. COMPREHENSIVE MAJOR MEDICAL PLAN

324 N.C. 402 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 1989

See Lemons v. Old Hickory Council, 322 N.C. 271, 276-77 , 367 S.E. 2d 655, 658 (1988). As the General Assembly has not done so, we will not infer any such intent on its part. … See Porter v. Dept. of Insurance, 40 N.C. App. 376 , 253 S.E. 2d 44 , disc. rev. denied, 297 N.C. 455 , 256 S.E. 2d 808 (1979). We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals to this extent.

Board of County Commissioners v. Candler

123 N.C. 682 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1898

Plaintiff again, at Spring Term, 1898, found that he had been again legislated out of court, and another motion was made to be allowed to substitute the ‘ ‘board of education” instead of that of the board of commissioners … And this very point is decided in this case at February Term, 1896 — Tillery v. Candler, 118 N. C., 888 . It is true that defendants demurred and the demurrer was sustained.

Monteith v. Board of County Commissioners

195 N.C. 71 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1928

Felmet v. Comrs., 186 N. C., 251 , and eases cited. … Hill v. Skinner, 169 N. C., at p. 412. See Plott v. Comrs., 187 N. C., p. 125; Flake v. Comrs., 192 N. C., 590 .

Board of Commissioners v. Addington

68 N.C. 254 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1873

twenty-five dollars, but a judgment is rendered against the plaintiff, the appeal is to be placed upon the trial, or issue docket, to be tried anew in the Superior Court upon the facts, as was decided in the case of Cowles v. … Rep. 128 , and the case of Wells v. Sluderi at this term. This disposes of the case in this Court, and renders it unnecessary to notice the other points made in the case. There is error. This will be certified.

Board of Commissioners v. Abee Bros.

175 N.C. 701 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 22, 1918

Thornton v. McNeely, 144 N. C., 622 . … In the present case the referee in his elaborate and careful report finds, in effect, that on 8 October, 1912, the principal defendant entered into a written contract with Board of Commissioners of plaintiff county to construct

Elliott v. North Carolina Psychology Board

348 N.C. 230 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 8, 1998

Associated Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Payne, 342 N.C. 825, 832 , 467 S.E.2d 398, 401 (1996) (quoting Thompson v. Wake County Bd. of Educ., 292 N.C. 406, 410 , 233 S.E.2d 538, 541 (1977) (citation omitted)). … Turlington v. McLeod, 323 N.C. 591, 594 , 374 S.E.2d 394, 397 (1988). The Board’s findings of fact, which are pertinent to this determination, are as follows: 6.

Board of Education v. . Orr

161 N.C. 218 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 1912

In Graham v. Edwards, 114 N. C., 230 , the Court said: “We again repeat, as was lately said in Sondley v. Asheville, 112 N. … Mitchell v. Haggard, 105 N. C., 173 ; Hardee v. Timberlake, 159 N. C., 552 .

Medlin v. County Board of Education

167 N.C. 239 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 18, 1914

This is an action against the county board of education of Wake and the school committee of District No. 2 (white) of House's *Page 280 Creek Township. … Johnson v. Board of Education , 166 N.C. 468 . The jury found that the children of the plaintiff were of unmixed white blood and entitled to attend the white school.

Pemberton v. County Board of Education

172 N.C. 552 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 22, 1916

The defendant, the county board of education, received application for the removal of the site and heard witnesses upon that subject. … Pickler v. Board of Education , 149 N.C. 221 .

Greenleaf v. Board of Commissioners

123 N.C. 30 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 18, 1898

Brodnax v. Groom, 64 N. C., 244 ; Long v. Commissioners, 76 N. C., 273 ; Burwell v. Commissioners, 93 N. C., 73 . The county commissioners -may establish roads and ferries. Code, Section 2014. … We are not unmindful of the fact that it is stated in Brodnax v.

Leonard v. Board of Commissioners

185 N.C. 527 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 26, 1923

“Those voting in the affirmative are Senators Armfield, Baggett, Boyette, Brown of Columbus, Brown of Rockingham, Castelloe, Delaney, Ebbs, Grady, Graham, Griffin, Hargett, Harris of Franklin, Harris of "Wake, Harrison, Heath … Debnam v. Chitty, 131 N. C., 657 , overruled.” The authority is decisive, and the judgment of his Honor is Affirmed.

Jenkins v. . Board of Elections

180 N.C. 169 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 13, 1920

Twitchell v. Blodgett , 13 Mich. 151 ; Sharpless v. Mayor of Philadelphia , 21 Pa., 162 . … Morrison v. Springer , 15 Iowa 304 ; Lehman v. McBride , 15 Ohio State, 573 ; State v. Main , 16 Wis. 398 .

State Ex Rel . Armfield v. . Brown and Others

73 N.C. 81 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1875

Armfield v. Brown, 70 N. C. Rep., 27 . … Lippard v. Roseman, 72 N. C. Rep., 427, 2.

Thompson v. Board of Commissioners

181 N.C. 265 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 27, 1921

¥e think the demurrer should have been sustained under authority of Mills v. Deaton, 170 N. C., 386 , and Abernethy v. Comrs., 169 N. C., 631 . … The case of Comrs. v. Bain, 173 N. C., 377 , is easily distinguishable from tbe one at bar, as tbe facts there presented are materially different from those now appearing.

Judd v. State Board of Elections

366 N.C. 251 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 23, 2012

Bell v. County Board of Elections

188 N.C. 311 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 1, 1924

S., 5984 et seq.; 6018 et seq.; Britt v. Board of Canvassers, 172 N. C., 797 . … Rowland v. Board of Elections, 184 N. C., 78 ; Brown v. Costen, 176 N. C., 63 . But in these cases it is likewise held tbat the powers vested in the county board of elections are not judicial, but ministerial.

Reese v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG BOARD OF EDUCATION

363 N.C. 656 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 8, 2009

685 S.E.2d 105 (2009) Jerry Alan REESE v. The CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG BOARD OF EDUCATION and County of Mecklenburg, North Carolina. No. 225P09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. October 8, 2009.

State v. Cradle

281 N.C. 198 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 1972

State v. Rogers, 275 N.C. 411 , 168 S.E. 2d 345 (1969); State v. Robinson, 271 N.C. 448 , 156 S.E. 2d 854 (1967); State v. Greer, 270 N.C. 143 , 153 S.E. 2d 849 (1967); State v. … If the sentence pronounced here seems harsh, the executive branch of government acting through the Board of Paroles may lawfully commute it.