Opinion

Board of Education v. Hood

  • 204 N.C. 353
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Mar 15, 1933
Status
Published
Author
Brogden
On the bench
Brogden
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 45.0%

The opinion

Brogden, J.

Tbe cashier’s check described in tbe evidence did not constitute a statutory preference as defined by C. S., 218(c). In re Bank, ante, 143. See, also, Morecock v. Hood, Comr., 202 N. C., 321 , 162 S. E., 730 . Nor do tbe facts constitute a preference upon tbe trust fund theory as interpreted in Parker v. Trust Co., 202 N. C., 230 , 162 S. E., 564 ; Williams v. Hood, Comr., ante, 140. See, also, Flack v. Hood, Comr., ante, 337.

Reversed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.