Case law

Brown v. State

808 S.E.2d 145 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 2017

State v. Brown

282 N.C. 117 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1972

The facts pertinent to this question are: Three arrest warrants were issued for defendant Eugene Brown, each charging him with the first degree murder of Dorothy Brown, his wife, on 22 March 1970. … Ball, supra; State v. Hatcher, supra; State v. Johnson, supra; State v. Hollars, supra.

Hill v. . Brown

144 N.C. 117 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 12, 1907

In August, 1903, defendant Brown acquired title to- the share of the Whaley children. It is contended that he is estopped by the principles laid down in Carter v. White, 134 N. … Napier v. Jones, 47 Ala., 96 ; Davis v. Montgomery:, 51 Ala., 146 ; Herndon v. Neave, 18 S. C., 354; Haskett v. Maxey, 139 Ind., 66 ; 19 L. R.

Brown v. Hook

810 S.E.2d 236 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 19, 2018

State v. . Brown

218 N.C. 415 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1940

S. v. Utley, supra; S. v. Blackwelder, 182 N. C., 899 .” S. v. Coal Co., 210 N. C., 742 (746). Defendant admitted that be shot bis wife, Bertha Brown, three times, either of which wounds could produce death. … S. v. Burney, 215 N. C., 598 (614). In S. v. Steele, 190 N.

Brown v. State

805 S.E.2d 496 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 6, 2017

Maddox v. Brown

232 N.C. 542 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1950

The mere fact deceased would not yield the right of way did not relieve Brown of the duty to exercise due care in that respect. Ward v. Bowles, 228 N.C. 273 , 45 S.E. 2d 354 . … Whichard v. Lipe, 221 N.C. 53 , 19 S.E. 2d 14 .

State v. . Brown

221 N.C. 301 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1942

See, also, S. v. Parker , 91 N.C. 650 ; S. v. Bloodworth , 94 N.C. 918 . … Gupton , 30 N.C. 271 , 273 ; S. v. King , 113 N.C. 631 ; and S. v.

Fields v. . Brown

160 N.C. 295 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 23, 1912

If Graves was in possession with Brown, plaintiff properly joined him in this action for tbe recovery of tbe property. Haughton v. Newberry, 69 N. C., 456 ; Webb v. Taylor, 80 N. C., 305 ; Bowen v. King, 146 N. … There was evidence that defendant Brown made tbe representations; that they were calculated and intended to deceive, and did deceive. Lunn v. Shermer, 93 N. C., 164 ; Black v. Black, 110 N. C., 398 ; Ashe v. Gray, 88 N.

Brown v. . Keener

74 N.C. 714 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

Norfleet v. Cromwell, 70 N. C. Rep. 634 . People v. Mayor of Brooklyn, 4 Const. R. 440. Carter v. Tide Water Company, 18, N. J. 54; State v. Blake, 36 N. J. 442. Reades v. Treasarer of Wood Co., 8 Ohio, N. S. 343. … Cypress Pond Draining Co. v. Hooper. 2 Metcalf, (Ky.) 350; Cosier v. Tide Water Co., 18 N. J. 54; State v. Blake, 36 N. J. 442.

Campbell v. Brown

86 N.C. 376 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1882

Brown, because of his having departed from the state before the bond sued on had matured, and his being continuously absent since. The proviso, contained in Rev. … In Lane v. Richardson, 79 N.

State v. Brown

280 N.C. 588 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1972

State v. Taylor, supra; State v. McVay and State v. Simmons, supra; State v. Barnes, supra. This Court, in State v. … In State v.

Brown v. State

805 S.E.2d 696 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 6, 2017

Spain v. Brown

236 N.C. 355 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 29, 1952

Truelove v. R. R., 222 N.C. 704 , 24 S.E. 2d 537 ; Brown v. Hall, 226 N.C. 732 , 40 S.E. 2d 412 . The only pleading on the part of the defendant is either a demurrer or an answer. G-.S. 1-124. … The rule which prohibits the incorporation of extraneous, evidential, irrelevant, impertinent, or scandalous matter in a complaint or answer, G.S. 1-153; Brown v. Hall, supra; Truelove v. R. R., supra; Parlier v.

State v. . Brown

225 N.C. 22 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1945

S. v. Wilson, 221 N. C., 365 , 20 S. E. (2d), 273 ; S. v. Holt, 195 N. C., 240 , 135 S. E., 324 ; S. v. Mills, 181 N. C., 530 , 106 S. E., 677 ; S. v. Price, 175 N. C., 804 , 95 S. E., 478 ; S. v. Smith, 103 N. … S. v. Mills, supra; S. v. Poythress, 174 N. C., 809 , 93 S. E., 919 ; S. v. Telfair, 130 N. C., 645 , 40 S. E., 976 ; S. v. Smith, supra.

Wright v. . Brown

116 N.C. 26 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1895

It has been held, as far back as McDonald v. McDonald, 5 Jones Eq., 211 , followed by the cases of Masten v. Marlow, 65 N. C., 695 , Bodenhamer v. Welch, 89 N. … The second taker is fixed by the will, which makes this ease stronger for the defendant Brown than that case was for the defendant Hackett. Tbe case of Starnes v. Hill, 112 N.

Brown v. . Kirkpatrick

217 N.C. 486 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1940

Plaintiff Brown then instituted action on his note for $379.75. … Alabama Mortgage & Securities Co. v. Chinery, 237 Ala., 198 , 186 Sou., 136 ; Skeffington v. Rowland, 52 Ga. App., 619 , 184 S. E., 330 ; Page v. Ford, 65 Ore., 450 ; Ladd & Tilton Bank v.

Clark v. Brown

327 N.C. 426 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 29, 1990

CLARK v. Joseph G. BROWN. No. 317P90. Supreme Court of North Carolina. August 29, 1990. Norma S. Harrell, Asst. Atty. Gen. for defendant. Edward Connette, Charlotte, for plaintiff.

Brown v. . Adams

174 N.C. 490 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1917

Brown, and the original defendant, J. E. S. Adams. … We refer to Harrell v. Hagan , 150 N.C. 242 , and Grissom v. Grissom , 170 N.C. 97 (opinion by Justice Brown), where Witty v.

Brown v. State

370 N.C. 284 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 16, 2017