Opinion

Clark v. Brown

  • 327 N.C. 426
  • 395 S.E.2d 675
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Aug 29, 1990
Status
Published
Cited by
32 cases
Authority
More cited than 88.1%

“Erroneous judgments may be corrected only by appeal, and a motion under [Rule 60(a)] cannot be used as a substitute for appellate review.”

How later courts described this case

  • “Erroneous judgments may be corrected only by appeal, and a motion under [Rule 60(a)] cannot be used as a substitute for appellate review.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

395 S.E.2d 675 (1990)

327 N.C. 426

Robert W. CLARK

v.

Joseph G. BROWN.

No. 317P90.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 29, 1990.

Norma S. Harrell, Asst. Atty. Gen. for defendant.

Edward Connette, Charlotte, for plaintiff.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant for Writ of Supersedeas and Temporary Stay of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, in this matter, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*676 "Stay dissolved, supersedeas denied. By order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of August 1990."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of August 1990."

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.