Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmspb

7,869 results

2.92s

  • Timothy Baker v. Department of the Navy

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Mar 13, 2024

    Nevertheless, absent good cause shown, the Board will not excuse an untimely petition for review no matter how minimal the delay. Bond v. Department of the Army, 51 M.S.P.R. 322, 324 (1991); e.g., Smith v. … Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit), within 30 calendar days after you receive this decision. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2); see Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 582 U.S. 420 (2017).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Gerald Karasinski v. Office of Personnel Management

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 14, 2024

    See Banks v. … See Banks, 4 M.S.P.R. at 271; see also Russo v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Joe Cox v. Department of Homeland Security

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 6, 2014

    See Haasz v. … See Karapinka v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Joshua Thornbury v. Department of Veterans Affairs

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 29, 2022

    CRF, Tab 18 at 61. ¶10 Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 1204(a)(2), the Board has jurisdiction to consider an appellant’s claim of agency noncompliance with a Board order. Kerr v. … Loui v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 25 F.3d 1011, 1014 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Suresh Suri v. Department of the Air Force

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Oct 17, 2014

    1 v. … See Weathers v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Adrienne D. Carter v. Department of Housing and Urban Development

    Merit Systems Protection Board · May 11, 2015

    See Thome v. … See FitzGerald v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Timothy Baker v. Department of the Navy

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Mar 13, 2024

    Nevertheless, absent good cause shown, the Board will not excuse an untimely petition for review no matter how minimal the delay. Bond v. Department of the Army, 51 M.S.P.R. 322, 324 (1991); e.g., Smith v. … Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit), within 30 calendar days after you receive this decision. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2); see Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 582 U.S. 420 (2017).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Terri Coates v. United States Postal Service

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Mar 18, 2024

    DC-0752-16-0369-X-1 v. … Coates v. U.S. Postal Service, MSPB Docket No.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Jeniqua Knuckles v. Department of the Army

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Mar 15, 2024

    v. … The Board’s standard of review of an arbitrator’s award is narrow; such awards are entitled to a greater degree of deference than initial decisions issued by the Board’s administrative judges. Sadiq v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Wilbert McClay v. Department of Commerce

    Merit Systems Protection Board · May 3, 2024

    See Panter v. … The Board generally does not identify an agency subcomponent as the respondent in appeals before the Board. See, e.g., Searcy v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Christie Wyatt v. United States Postal Service

    Merit Systems Protection Board · May 21, 2024

    v. … Pirkkala v. Department of Justice, 123 M.S.P.R. 288, ¶ 19 (2016); Lacy v. Department of the Navy, 78 M.S.P.R. 434, 437 (1998).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Matthew Arney v. Department of the Army

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 11, 2024

    See Heartland By- Products, Inc. v. U.S., 568 F.3d 1360, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (“Under general principles of law, judicial decisions are given retroactive effect.”); NV24-Keyport2 v. … Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit), within 30 calendar days after you receive this decision. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2); see Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 582 U.S. 420 (2017).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Richard Madsen v. Department of Veterans Affairs

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Mar 20, 2024

    Department of Justice, 112 M.S.P.R. 390, ¶ 6 (2009); see Ellison v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 7 F.3d 1031, 1034 (Fed. Cir. 1993). … See Pridgen v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Robert Kennedy v. Department of Veterans Affairs

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Apr 10, 2024

    were in fact received, Lima v. … See McCoy v. U.S.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Abenayaa Lane v. Department of the Army

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Mar 19, 2024

    relief, pursuant to Singleton v. … Supreme Court’s decision in Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, 598 U.S. 449 (2023), and the Board’s recent Opinion and Order in Erdel v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Dennis R. Russell v. Department of the Army

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Dec 16, 2014

    White v. Department of Veterans Affairs, 120 M.S.P.R. 405, ¶ 5 (2013). … See Johnson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Margaret Wright v. Office of Personnel Management

    Merit Systems Protection Board · May 30, 2024

    The Board has found, in similar circumstances, that attorney fees were warranted in the interest of justice. See e.g., Cox v. U.S. … As the Board stated in Trowell v. U.S.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • LaTonya S. Mickens v. Department of Transportation

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Feb 6, 2015

    Lewis v. … The Board has held that the discovery process, and not FOIA, is the proper method for obtaining information in Board appeals. Ellis v. U.S. Postal Service, 121 M.S.P.R. 570, ¶ 6 (2014).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Keerti Varmaa v. Department of the Treasury

    Merit Systems Protection Board · May 2, 2024

    v. … The Board’s jurisdiction is not plenary; it is limited to those matters over which it has been given jurisdiction by law, rule, or regulation. Maddox v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 759 F.2d 9, 10 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Joseph Copeland v. United States Postal Service

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 11, 2024

    v. … See Banks v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.