Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmspb

7,869 results

0.26s

  • Justin Christopher Graves v. Department of Veterans Affairs

    2016 MSPB 24 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 17, 2016

    See, e.g., Miller v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 626 F. App’x 261, 269 (Fed. … The Board “does not have the authority to determine the visited June 17, 2016). See Willingham v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Phillip Brown v. Department of the Navy

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 28, 2016

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD PHILLIP BROWN, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, PH-0752-13-0914-I-1 … See Maddox v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 759 F.2d 9, 10 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Casey D. Weathers v. Department of the Navy

    2014 MSPB 57 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 24, 2014

    Department of Labor v. … See Clark v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kelly Stephen Jennings v. Social Security Administration

    2016 MSPB 31 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 13, 2016

    See Mauldin v. U.S. … See Martin v. U.S.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kelly Stephen Jennings v. Social Security Administration

    2016 MSPB 31 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 13, 2016

    See Mauldin v. U.S. … See Martin v. U.S.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kristi L. Putnam v. Department of Homeland Security

    2014 MSPB 70 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 27, 2014

    See, e.g., Diehl v. … Id., ¶ 17; see Conforto v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 713 F.3d 1111, 1121 (Fed. Cir. 2013). Here, the appellant argued that her retirement was the product of coercion 4 In Helms v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kristi L. Putnam v. Department of Homeland Security

    2014 MSPB 70 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 27, 2014

    See, e.g., Diehl v. … Id., ¶ 17; see Conforto v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 713 F.3d 1111, 1121 (Fed. Cir. 2013). Here, the appellant argued that her retirement was the product of coercion 4 In Helms v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • John E. Burke v. Department of Veterans Affairs

    2014 MSPB 48 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 23, 2014

    See Mullins v. … See Bables v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Chanie Robinson v. Office of Personnel Management

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 12, 2024

    Mendoza v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 966 F.2d 650, 653 (Fed. Cir. 1992) (en banc). … See, e.g., Brown v. U.S.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Douglas W. Freeze v. Department of the Navy

    2015 MSPB 9 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jan 27, 2015

    See Rhodes v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 487 F.3d 1377, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2007). … Jones v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Robert J MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security

    2024 MSPB 15 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Nov 14, 2024

    Wyeroski v. Department of Transportation, 465 F. App’x 956, 957 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (citing Spears v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 766 F.2d 520, 523 (Fed. Cir. 1985)). The U.S. … See Inman v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Darla Gaetos v. Department of Veterans Affairs

    2014 MSPB 39 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 2, 2014

    Moorman v. Department of the Army, 68 M.S.P.R. 60 , 62-63 (1995), aff'd sub nom. Moorman v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 79 F.3d 1167 (Fed. … See Noble v. U.S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stacy Miller v. Department of Defense

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Feb 1, 2023

    Brown v. U.S. Postal Service, 115 M.S.P.R. 609, ¶ 10, aff’d, 469 F. App’x 852 (Fed. Cir. 2011); Searcy, 114 M.S.P.R. 281, ¶ 12. … Brown, 115 M.S.P.R. 609, ¶ 16.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Rebstock Consolidation v. Department of Homeland Security

    2015 MSPB 53 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 29, 2015

    See Webb v. … Merit Systems Protection Board, No. 14-60645, 2015 WL 5010031, at *8 (5th Cir. Aug. 24, 2015); Linder v. Department of Justice, 122 M.S.P.R. 14 , ¶ 14 (2014); McDonnell v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stephanie D. Thomas v. Department of the Navy

    2016 MSPB 34 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 27, 2016

    Her appeal of that action is pending in the Board’s Washington Regional Office. Thomas v. Department of the Navy, MSPB Docket No. … that previous Board decisions characterizing such suspensions as constructive were in error); see also Pittman v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jerry M Sprouse v. Department of Veterans Affairs

    2024 MSPB 12 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Oct 25, 2024

    rule applied to Board proceedings and that the Board’s prior decision to the contrary, Delk, 57 M.S.P.R. at 530-32, had since been overruled by the Federal Circuit in Wiley v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott, 524 U.S. 357, 364-69 & n.4 (1998) (declining to apply the rule to parole revocation hearings); Immigration and Naturalization Service v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Aubrey J. El v. Department of Commerce

    2015 MSPB 64 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Dec 21, 2015

    The full Board denied the appellant’s petition for review of that initial decision and affirmed the initial decision, which became the Board’s final decision. El v. … As a result, we find that he has not established the Board’s jurisdiction over this claim. See King v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Steven P. Pirkkala v. Department of Justice

    2016 MSPB 16 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Mar 31, 2016

    Verkennes v. … He need prove only that his ability to file with the Board was “affected” or “impaired” by illness. Washington v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Andreas Hau v. Department of Homeland Security

    2016 MSPB 33 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 19, 2016

    The Board must have jurisdiction over an appeal to apply the doctrine of res judicata. Noble v. U.S. Postal Service, 93 M.S.P.R. 693, ¶ 7 (2003). … Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the Board have declared should be avoided. See, e.g., id.; MGA, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation, 827 F.2d 729, 732 (Fed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Andreas Hau v. Department of Homeland Security

    2016 MSPB 33 · Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 19, 2016

    The Board must have jurisdiction over an appeal to apply the doctrine of res judicata. Noble v. U.S. Postal Service, 93 M.S.P.R. 693, ¶ 7 (2003). … Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the Board have declared should be avoided. See, e.g., id.; MGA, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation, 827 F.2d 729, 732 (Fed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.