Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmspb

7,869 results

1.14s

  • Vitaly Shik v. General Services Administration

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Apr 18, 2016

    v. … See Phillips v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Dennis McKeown v. Department of Homeland Security

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Sep 13, 2024

    To establish the Board’s jurisdiction over a RIF appeal, the appellant must show that he was either furloughed for more than 30 days, separated, or demoted by the RIF action. See Adams v. … See Covington v. Department of the Interior, 2023 MSPB 5, ¶¶ 16, 19; Arauz v. Department of Justice, 89 M.S.P.R. 529, ¶ 6 (2001).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Leffie Stroud v. Office of Personnel Management

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Oct 4, 2024

    v. … See Russo v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • John Paul Jones, III v. Department of Health and Human Services

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Mar 15, 2016

    v. … The Board has recognized that there is no law or regulation requiring an agency to select an applicant under a vacancy announcement. See Ward v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Elaine Ruggiero v. Office of Personnel Management

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 30, 2024

    -0068-I-1 v. … Id. ¶3 The Board will not consider a new argument raised for the first time on review absent a showing that it is based on new and material evidence. Clay v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Daniel W Colbert v. Department of Transportation

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 10, 2024

    Williams v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 892 F.3d 1156 (Fed. Cir. 2018). The appellant bears the burden of proving Board jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence. Tolbert v. … See Ramirez-Evans, 113 M.S.P.R. 297, ¶ 9; see also Forest v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 47 F.3d 409, 411-12 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Richard Lewis v. Office of Personnel Management

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 8, 2024

    v. … Thus, as noted, there is no basis for the Board to exercise jurisdiction over the appellant’s contentions. See Schmittling v. Department of the Army, 219 F.3d 1332, 1337 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Erick Diaz v. Department of the Navy

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Jun 27, 2024

    Ward v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 981 F.2d 521, 526 (Fed. Cir. 1992). … See Lewis v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Angela Northrup v. Department of Veterans Affairs

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Feb 28, 2025

    v. … See Bean v. U.S.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Daniel Defrank v. Department of Veterans Affairs

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 15, 2024

    Typically, a retirement is a voluntary action over which the Board lacks jurisdiction. O’Clery v. U.S. Postal Service, 67 M.S.P.R. 300, 302 (1995), aff’d per curiam, 95 F.3d 1166 (Fed. … However, the Board has recognized that employee-initiated actions that appear to be voluntary on their face are not always so. See Bean v. U.S. Postal Service, 120 M.S.P.R. 397, ¶ 7 (2013).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Clarence Jackson v. Department of Defense

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Aug 23, 2024

    The Board’s jurisdiction is not plenary; it is limited to those matters over which it has been given jurisdiction by law, rule, or regulation. Maddox v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 759 F.2d 9, 10 (Fed. Cir. 1985). … Suspensions of more than 14 days are within the Board’s jurisdiction under 5 U.S.C. §§ 7512(2) and 7513(d), however, a suspension of 14 days or fewer is not an appealable action under those provisions. Lefavor v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Tracy Munoz v. Department of Homeland Security

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 2, 2024

    v. … See Russo v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Chara Cordova v. Office of Personnel Management

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Jan 27, 2025

    CORDOVA, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, SF-0845-21-0545-B-1 v. … Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit), within 30 calendar days after you receive this decision. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2); see Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 582 U.S. 420 (2017).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Michael Howard King v. United States Postal Service

    Merit Systems Protection Board · May 27, 2016

    v. … See Owens v. U.S.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • James Thomas v. Office of Personnel Management

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 3, 2024

    v. … See Russo v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Michael A. Wallace v. Department of the Army

    Merit Systems Protection Board · May 19, 2016

    In re Corps of Engineers, Mobile, Group 1 v. Department of the Army, MSPB Docket No. … See Pinat v. Office of Personnel Management, 931 F.2d 1544 (Fed. Cir. 1991).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Cook Sevgi v. Department of the Army

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Oct 15, 2024

    Hocker v. Department of Transportation, 63 M.S.P.R. 497, 505 (1994), aff’d, 64 F.3d 676 (Fed. Cir. 1995) (Table); Armstrong v. … Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit), within 30 calendar days after you receive this decision. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2); see Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 582 U.S. 420 (2017).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Timmie P Owens v. Department of the Army

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Feb 26, 2025

    v. … Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit), within 30 calendar days after you receive this decision. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2); see Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 582 U.S. 420 (2017).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Keith Mills v. Department of the Army

    Merit Systems Protection Board · May 17, 2016

    -1 v. … See Pinat v. Office of Personnel Management, 931 F.2d 1544 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Tanya Taylor v. Department of Commerce

    Merit Systems Protection Board · Jul 26, 2024

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD TANYA TAYLOR, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, CB-7121-23-0003-V-1 … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.