Case law

Travis

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 30, 2026

Brown v. Kansas City Live, LLC, 931 F.3d 712, 714 (8th Cir. 2019) (quoting Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 96 (1980) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1738)); Migra v. Warren City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., 465 U.S. 75, 81 (1984). … Brown, 931 F.3d at 714 (citing Bannum, Inc. v. City of St. Louis, 195 S.W.3d 541, 544 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006) (cleaned up).

Cook Paint & Varnish Co. v. Cook Chemical Co.

85 F. Supp. 257 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 8, 1949

In Skinner v. … Co. v. June Mfg.

Milgram Food Stores, Inc. v. Gelco Corp.

550 F. Supp. 992 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 7, 1982

See Brown v. Coastal Truckways, Inc., 44 N.C.App. 454 , 261 S.E.2d 266, 268 (1980). … Chancellor, Inc. v.

Martin v. Wyrick

423 F. Supp. 884 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 17, 1976

Respondent’s citation and attempted reliance upon Tyler v. Swenson (8th Cir. 1976) 527 F.2d 877 , is likewise untenable. In that case, Judge Stephenson, in reliance upon Brown v. … That case applied principles stated in Roberts v. La Vallee, 389 U.S. 40 , 88 S.Ct. 194 , 19 L.Ed.2d 41 (1967), Brown v.

Horowitz v. Curators of the University of Missouri

447 F. Supp. 1102 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 12, 1975

In the landmark case of Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education, 294 F.2d 150 (5 Cir. 1961), students were expelled apparently for engaging in lunch-counter demonstrations. … of Regents v.

Burks v. Walsh

461 F. Supp. 454 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 3, 1978

Finney v. Arkansas Board of Correction, 505 F.2d 194 (8th Cir. 1974), on remand, sub nom. Finney v. Hutto, 410 F.Supp. 251 (E.D.Ark.1976), aff’d, 548 F.2d 740 (8th Cir. 1977), aff’d sub nom. Hutto v. … Finney v. Arkansas Board of Corrections, supra, 505 F.2d at 200 . As the Supreme Court commented in Hutto v.

Jewel Tea Co. v. Lee's Summit

198 F. 532 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 20, 1912

Defendant Rittenhouse is its mayor, and the defendant Brown its marshal. The complainant corporation is a citizen of the state of Illinois and a resident of the city of Chicago. … State of Arkansas v. Kansas & T. Coal Co. et al. (C. C.) 96 Fed. 353 ; Humes v. City of Ft. Smith (C. C.) 93 Fed. 857 ; Sanford v. Poe, 69 Fed. 546 , 16 C. C. A. 305 , 60 L. R. A. 641; Nashville, C. & St. U. Ry. Co. v.

Chase v. First Federal Bank of Kansas City

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 12, 2018

See York v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 624 F.2d 495, 500 (4th Cir. 1980) (noting that as of that time, “no solvent association has ever secured approval for dissolution.”). … See also York v.

J. B. Acton, Inc. v. United States

221 F. Supp. 174 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 9, 1963

National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Co., 344 U.S. 344, 1 . c. 349, 73 S.Ct. 287, 1 . c. 290, 97 L.Ed. 377 . … Justice Holmes in Towne v.

Roberts v. Flemming

187 F. Supp. 649 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 21, 1960

Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1938, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 . … This case is factually similar to Pruitt v. Flemming, D.C.S.D.W.Va.1960, 182 F.Supp. 159 , Dean v. Flemming, D.C.E.D. Ky.1959, 180 F.Supp. 553 , and Klimas-zewski v.

Klein v. Kijakazi

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 5, 2023

Brown v. Astrue, No. 08-4026-CV-C-NKL-SSA, 2008 WL 4151613, at *2 (W.D. Mo. … The ALJ specifically considered possible absences when determining Brown’s RFC.”).

United States v. One 1987 Volkswagen Jetta

760 F. Supp. 772 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 7, 1991

Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co., 398 *775 U.S. 144, 157, 90 S.Ct. 1598, 1608 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Inland Oil and Transport Co. v. … Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.”

Leftridge v. United States

612 F. Supp. 631 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 7, 1985

Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979). However, summary judgment is an extreme remedy which should not be granted, unless defendant has established his right to judgment beyond controversy. … In Wo liman v.

Richardson v. Miller

716 F. Supp. 1246 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 30, 1989

The Court held, however, that: We have, however, expressly rejected such a construction, Brown v. … In regard to question (2) the Court noted that in “Brown v.

Department Store, Package, Grocery, Paper House, Liquor & Meat Drivers, Helpers & Warehousemen, Local Union No. 955 v. Bermingham-Prosser Paper Co.

364 F. Supp. 426 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 13, 1973

United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574 , 80 S.Ct. 1347 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1409 *429 (1960); See also, United Steelworkers of America v. … Textile Workers Union v. Lincoln Mills, 353 U.S. 448 , 77 S.Ct. 923 , 1 L.Ed.2d 972 (1957).

Royal American Managers, Inc. v. International Surplus Lines Insurance

760 F. Supp. 788 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 21, 1991

Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.” … In Baxter v.

Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance v. M. F. A. Mutual Insurance

211 F. Supp. 247 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 8, 1962

In Mallory Motor Company v. … Browne, 231 Mo.App. 1147 , 85 S.W. 2d 197 ].

New Beginning Sanctuary, A Missouri Not-For-Profit Corporation, Jaam Properties LLC, A Missouri Limited Liability Company, and Alon Fisch, An Individual v. City of Springfield, Missouri, A Missouri Municipal Corporation

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 22, 2026

One Love Hous., LLC v. City of Anoka, Minnesota, 93 F.4th 424, 429 (8th Cir. 2024) (citing Tsombanidis v. W. Haven Fire Dep't, 352 F.3d 565, 573 (2d Cir. 2003)). See also Gallagher v. … In considering reasonable accommodation claims, federal courts should limit their review to the materials that were presented to the local land use board, except in circumstances where the board prevents applicants from

United States ex rel. Kirby v. Southern Constructors, Inc.

211 F. Supp. 537 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 11, 1962

Defendants rely on 1 Am.Jur.2d Accord and Satisfaction § 18; § 1279 of Corbin on Contracts (1 vol. ed.); Lightfoot and Son v. Edward Hurd and Co. (1905), 113 Mo.App. 612 , 88 S.W. 128 ; H. C. … Pollman and Brothers Coal and Sprinkling Co. v. St. Louis (1898), 145 *539 Mo. 651 , 47 S.W. 563 ; and St. Joseph School Board v. Hull (1897), 72 Mo.App. 403 .

H. T. Poindexter & Sons Merchandise Co. v. United States

40 F. Supp. 787 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 18, 1941

In the case of Luzier’s Inc., v. … Co. v. United States, 33 F.Supp. 801, 803 .