Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmowd

1,907 results

1.29s

  • Haase v. Chapman

    308 F. Supp. 399 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 29, 1969

    Russell v. … Clark v. Brown (C.A. 8) 119 F. 130, 132 , where it is said that such “irregularity which might have defeated the application.” (Emphasis added.)

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Incorvia v. Berryhill

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 24, 2018

    Next, Plaintiff’s reliance on Brown v. Astrue is similarly displaced. 2010 WL 889835, at *25 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 8, 2010). … See Papesh v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mahurin Trucking, LLC v. Callison

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 12, 2024

    Plaintiff dismissed Count V prior to trial. … Co. v. Miceli, 480 S.W.3d. 354, 370 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Goodwin v. Village of Oakview, Missouri

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 25, 2019

    Commr’s of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997). … Brown v. Ferguson, No. 4:15CV00831 ERW, 2015 WL 4393960, at *2 (E.D. Mo. July 16, 2015) (quoting James v. Friend, 458 F.3d 726, 731 (8th Cir. 2006)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Mobil Oil Corp.

    362 F. Supp. 786 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 27, 1973

    In Nishiyama v. North American Rockwell Corp., 49 F.R.D. 288 (C.D.Cal.1970), and Foye v. United A. … The Court believes that the correct rule and better practice was announced by Chief Judge Brown in EEOC v. Pick-Memphis Corp., 5 CCHEmp. Prac.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Drainage Dist. No. 19 v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.

    198 F. 253 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 27, 1912

    Immediately thereafter, in Holden v. … Co. v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. et al. (C. C.) 119 Ted. 209-215; Powers v. Railway, 169 U. S. 92 , 18 Sup. Ct. 264, 42 L. Ed. 673 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Hooper v. Swenson

    249 F. Supp. 280 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 6, 1965

    Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 ; Annotation 97 L.Ed. 543 , 1. c. 544; Fay v. Noia, supra. … See Hooper v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Mee v. Becker

    456 F. Supp. 224 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 19, 1978

    Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 , 91 S.Ct. 1999 , 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971); Owen v. City of Independence, 560 F.2d 925 (8th Cir. 1977). … See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). He has shown neither.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • James v. Ribicoff

    204 F. Supp. 176 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 25, 1962

    The findings of the Secretary as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive * * Social Security Board v. … Gancher v. Hobby, 145 F.Supp. 461 (1955).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pipeline Productions, Inc. v. S&A Pizza, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 28, 2022

    Darts Ass’n v. Zaffina, 762 F.3d 921, 927 (9th Cir. 2014) (citation and quotation marks omitted); Goldenberg v. Indel, Inc., 741 F. Supp. 2d 618, 628 (D.N.J. 2010) (same); see also Hunter Innovations Co. v. … Brown v. Fifth Judicial Dist. Drug Task Force, 255 F.3d 475, 477 (8th Cir. 2001) (citing United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co., 259 U.S. 344 (1921)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • A v. Park Hill School District

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 6, 2023

    of Education (“the Board”). … “Ultimately, “[i]t is not the purpose of this Court to step in and rehear the evidence and rethink the decision of school board officials.” Sykes v. Sweeney, 638 F. Supp. 274, 279 (E.D. Mo. 1986).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Britt v. Agape Baptist Church, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 28, 2025

    Boarding School, DAVID WILSON, Individually and in his role as Staff Member for Agape Boarding School, ROBERT GRAVES, Individually … Zutz v. Nelson, 601 F.3d 842, 848 (8th Cir. 2010) (citing Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Dealy v. Heckler

    616 F. Supp. 880 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 16, 1984

    Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … One year later, in Board of Regents v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Morton v. Homelite, Inc.

    183 F.R.D. 657 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 28, 1998

    In Campbell v. … Anderson is accredited by the National Academy of Forensic Engineers and Board Certified in Forensic Engineering by the Council of Engineering Speciality Boards. Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chase v. First Federal Bank of Kansas City

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 12, 2018

    See York v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 624 F.2d 495, 500 (4th Cir. 1980) (noting that as of that time, “no solvent association has ever secured approval for dissolution.”). … See also York v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Travis

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 30, 2026

    Brown v. Kansas City Live, LLC, 931 F.3d 712, 714 (8th Cir. 2019) (quoting Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 96 (1980) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1738)); Migra v. Warren City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., 465 U.S. 75, 81 (1984). … Brown, 931 F.3d at 714 (citing Bannum, Inc. v. City of St. Louis, 195 S.W.3d 541, 544 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006) (cleaned up).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Joski v. CTB Investors

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 13, 2025

    See Carter v. The Advisory Grp., Inc., No. 8:06CV603, 2007 WL 3112453, at *3 (D. Neb. Oct. 22, 2007). … Id.; Brown v. Kansas City, No. 4:20-CV-00920-DGK, 2022 WL 15045965, at *2 (W.D. Mo.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Janson v. LegalZoom. Com, Inc.

    727 F. Supp. 2d 782 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 27, 2010

    ) (citing Hall v. … Bockelman v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Buckner

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 14, 2022

    Stickler v. … See Williams v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bartlett & Co., Grain v. Union Pacific Railroad

    528 F. Supp. 1234 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 4, 1981

    United States v. Western Pac. R. Co., supra 352 U.S. at 69 , 77 S.Ct. at 168 ; Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Wichita Board of Trade, supra, 412 U.S. at 820-21 , 93 S.Ct. at 2381-82 . II. … Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe v. Wichita Board of Trade, supra 412 U.S. at 820-21 , 93 S.Ct. at 2381-82 . Union Pacific has moved to dismiss Bartlett’s complaint.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.