Case law

United States v. Clark

19 F. Supp. 981 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 29, 1937

citizens in the twenty-eighth precinct, identified in their minds only as citizéns .intending to and voting Republican ballots and not at all identified in their minds as John Doe, Richard Roe, William • Smith, Thomas’ Brown … Immediately after he left the polling place he attempted to telephone to the Board of Election Commissioners, but was prevented from doing that, being surrounded by persons whose conduct was threatening.

Joseph S. Finch & Co. v. McKittrick

23 F. Supp. 244 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 25, 1938

We would have thought that the first of the two contentions had in it much of merit were it not for the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court in State Board v. … The opinion and judgment in State Board v. Young’s Market Co. do not, however, dispose of the second contention made by plaintiffs.

United States v. Young

210 F. Supp. 640 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 14, 1962

Co. v. … One Zumstein Briefmarker Katalog 1938, (E.D.Pa.1938) 24 F.Supp. 516 , (involving copies of postage stamps) and United States v. Brown, (2nd Cir., 1957) 246 F.2d 541 , (involving Mexican certificates).

Evans Electrical Const. Co. v. Wm. S. Lozier, Inc.

68 F. Supp. 256 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 30, 1946

Plumley v. United States, 226 U.S. 545 , 33 S.Ct. 139 , 57 L.Ed. 342 ; Merrill-Ruckgaber Co. v. United States, 241 U.S. 387 , 36 S.Ct. 662 , 60 L.Ed. 1058 ; United States v. … Co. v. United States, D.C., 43 F.Supp. 313 ; Stiers Bros. Const. Co. v. Broderick et al, D.C., 60 F.Supp. 792 ; Rego Bldg. Corp. v. United States, 99 Ct.Cl. 445 ; R. C. Huffman Const. Co. v. United States, 100 Ct.

Jackson v. Gill

711 F. Supp. 1503 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 10, 1989

Respondent’s supplemental response also argues that Black v. … Douglas v.

Berry v. Garza

734 F. Supp. 411 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 16, 1990

Pipe Fitters Health & Welfare Trust v. Waldo, R. Inc., 872 F.2d 815, 817 (8th Cir.1989); Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Mullins, 455 U.S. 72 , 102 S.Ct. 851 , 70 L.Ed.2d 833 (1982). … Section 160(b) states in relevant part that “no complaint shall issue based upon any unfair labor practice occurring more than six months prior to the filing of the charge with the Board [National Labor Relations Board] .

Evans v. Mo-Kan Teamsters Pension Fund

519 F. Supp. 9 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 24, 1980

to the Board as to defining the jurisdiction of the Fund. … Phillips v. Kennedy, 542 F.2d 52 , 55 n.8 (8th Cir. 1976); see also, Moglia v. Geoghegan, supra, 403 F.2d 110 ; Feathers v.

Kandlbinder v. Reagen

713 F. Supp. 337 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 8, 1989

. § 1983 against defendant Michael V. … These cases are Brown v. Eichler, 664 F.Supp. 865 (D.Del.1987); Smith v. Onondaga County Support Collection Unit, 619 F.Supp. 825 (N.D.N.Y.1985); Marcello v. Regan, 574 F.Supp. 586 (D.R.I.1983); and Nelson v.

Skipton v. RevHoney, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 6, 2021

Jerry Brown and Debra Brown Jerry and Debra Brown were required under the MSA to execute personal guarantees for indebtedness as contemplated by the ERA. … The Browns breached the terms of the MSA.

Grace Co. v. Williams

20 F. Supp. 263 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 6, 1937

By the recent decision of the Supreme Court in National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, 57 S. … Coronado Coal Co., 259 U.S. 344, 407 , 42 S.Ct. 570, 581 , 66 L.Ed. 975 , 27 A.L.R. 762 , National Labor Relations Board v. Jones-Laughlin Steel Corporation, supra, and National Labor Relations Board v.

Kansas City, Missouri v. Federal Pacific Electric Co.

210 F. Supp. 545 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 4, 1962

Grand Trunk Western Railway Co., 236 U.S. 662 , 35 S.Ct. 444 , 59 L.Ed. 774 (1915); Scott v. Railroad Retirement Board, 227 F.2d 684 (7th Cir.1955); United States ex rel. Texas Portland Cement Co. v. … Co. v. International Coal Mining Co., 230 U.S. 184, 194 , 33 S.Ct. 893 , 57 L.Ed. 1446 (1913); Federal Trade Commission v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 363 U.S. 536 , 80 S.Ct. 1267 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1385 (1960); Brown Shoe Co. v.

United States v. Hamilton

391 F. Supp. 1090 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 25, 1975

Brown, 479 F.2d 1170, 1172 (2nd Cir. 1973); Post v. United States, 500 F.2d 582, 584 (8th Cir. 1974); United States v. Dace, 502 F.2d 897, 900 (8th Cir. 1974); Hess v. … United States v. Brown, 479 F.2d 1170, 1173 (2nd Cir. 1973); Post v. United States, 500 F.2d 582, 584 (8th Cir. 1974); Jorgenson v. United States, 477 F.2d 905, 906 (8th Cir. 1973).

Gillispie v. Helms

559 F. Supp. 40 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 15, 1983

Oscar Mayer & Company v. Evans, 441 U.S. 750, 755-756 , 99 S.Ct. 2066, 2071 , 60 L.Ed.2d 609 (1979); Lorillard v. Pons, 434 U.S. 575, 577, 584 , 98 S.Ct. 866, 868, 872 , 55 L.Ed.2d 40 (1975). … Barkley v. Carraux, 533 F.Supp. 242, 245 (S.D.Tx.1982; Goodman v. Board of Trustees of Community College District 524, 498 F.Supp. 1329, 1336 (N.D.Ill.1980); Marshall v.

Caudill v. Farmland Industries, Inc.

698 F. Supp. 1476 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 31, 1988

Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 708 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.” … Berry v. Board of Sup’rs of L.S.U., 715 F.2d 971, 981 (5th Cir.1983).

American Ins. Co. v. Lucas

38 F. Supp. 896 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 14, 1940

Board, C. R. Street, Chairman, $7,500.00” (“N. L.” means National Local Board). Ledger entry was in the account “Nat’l and Local Boards” and was “C. R. Street, - Chairman — $7,500.00.” … Board of Commissioners v. United States, 308 U.S. 343, 352 , 60 S. Ct. 285, 289 . 84 L.Ed. 313 . What do “considerations of fairness” require in the situation here presented? This proceeding is not one of punishment.

United States Department of Education v. Rose (In Re Rose)

227 B.R. 518 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 8, 1998

E.g., Department of Transp. & Dev. v. PNL Asset Management Co., LLC (In re Fernandez), 123 F.3d 241, 244 (5th Cir.1997); Schlossberg v. … Langenkamp v. Culp, 498 U.S. 42, 44 , 111 S.Ct. 330 , 112 L.Ed.2d 343 (1990) (per curiam) (quotation omitted). 7 . See, e.g., Dotson-Cannon v. Department of Educ.

Akers v. Swenson

286 F. Supp. 666 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 10, 1968

v. … Baines v. Swenson, supra; Collins v. Swenson, supra; Hooper v. Nash, supra; Russell v. Swenson, supra.

Jenkins v. State of Mo.

672 F. Supp. 400 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 15, 1987

Liddell v. State of Missouri, 731 F.2d at 1322 . … Griffin v. School Board of Prince Edward County, 377 U.S. 218, 233 , 84 S.Ct. 1226, 1234 , 12 L.Ed.2d 256 (1964).

Hoffman v. United States

52 F.2d 269 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 28, 1931

The case of Sweets Company, etc., v. Commissioner, etc. (2 C. C. A.) 40 F. (2d) 436, 438, is in point. … It had been held by the Board of Tax Appeals that, when there has been an affiliation of corporations, the affiliated group is the taxpayer, and that each change in the membership of an affiliated group creates a new taxpayer

Burns v. Wilkinson

333 F. Supp. 94 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 16, 1971

Brown v. Kearney (C.A.5) 355 F.2d 199 ; United States v. Hallman (C.A.3) 365 F.2d 289 . … Wilwording v. Swenson, supra; Cox v. Nash (W.D.Mo.) 226 F.Supp. 87 .