Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmowd

1,907 results

1.35s

  • Citicasters, Inc. v. McCaskill

    883 F. Supp. 1282 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 1, 1995

    Furthermore, defendants who are members of the Board of Police Commissioners are state officers and members of a state agency. State ex rel. Sayad v. Zych, 642 S.W.2d 907 (Mo.1982) (en banc). … Plaintiffs claim against the Board of Police Commissioners, through the individual members of the Board, however, is dismissed. 2.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Kern v. Armontrout

    662 F. Supp. 825 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 15, 1987

    In Garton v. … V. The Court concluded in Strickland v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jonas v. Hearnes

    236 F. Supp. 699 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 30, 1964

    Tawes, 377 U.S. 656 , 84 S.Ct. 1429 , 12 L.Ed.2d 595 (1964); Davis v. Mann, 377 U.S. 678 , 84 S.Ct. 1441 , 12 L.Ed.2d 609 (1964); Roman v. Sincock, 377 U.S. 695 , 84 S.Ct. 1449 , 12 L.Ed.2d 620 (1964) and Wesberry v. … As set forth in Reynolds v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Marvlo Fabrics, Inc. v. Jarus

    87 F. Supp. 245 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 3, 1949

    Bradford Woolen Corp. v. Freedman, 189 Misc. 242 , 71 N.Y.S.2d 257 . See also International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310 , 66 S.Ct. 154 , 90 L.Ed. 95 , 161 A.L.R. 1057 . … Gilbert v. Burnstine et al., 255 N.Y. 348 , 174 N.E. 706 , 73 A.L.R. 1453 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Missouri Public Service Corp. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.

    19 F. Supp. 38 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 16, 1937

    We are bound by the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in City of Campbell v. Arkansas-Missouri Power Company, 55 F.(2d) 560, 562 . See, also, Arkansas-Missouri Power Co. v. … City of Kennett (C.C.A.) 78 F.(2d) 911 , and Iowa Southern Utilities Co. v. Cassill (C.C.A.) 69 F.(2d) 703 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Harrington Enterprises, Inc. v. Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc.

    42 F. Supp. 3d 1197 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 9, 2013

    Brown v. City Chevrolet, LLC, No. 09-0642-CV-W-GAF, 2009 WL 3485833 , at *1 (W.D.Mo. Oct. 28, 2009); Bass v. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc., 07-0883-CV-W-ODS, 2008 WL 441962 , at *2 (W.D.Mo. … Pemiscot Cnty., Mo. v. W. Sur. Co., 51 F.3d 170 (8th Cir.1995); Larkin v. Brown, 41 F.3d 387 (8th Cir.1994); Walz v. FedEx Office & Print Servs., Inc., No. 2:12-CV-04188-NKL, 2012 WL 5386058 (W.D.Mo.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • IPI Liberty Village Associates v. Spalding Corners Associates (In Re IPI Liberty Village Associates)

    82 B.R. 507 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 16, 1987

    Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 131 , 99 S.Ct. 2205, 2209 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979), quoting Montana v. United States, 440 U.S. 147, 153 , 99 S.Ct. 970, 973 , 59 L.Ed.2d 210 (1979). … Brown, 442 U.S. at 131 , 99 S.Ct. at 2209 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Carrete-Michel v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    575 F. Supp. 150 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 14, 1983

    Landon v. … Commissioner, 370 F.2d 713, 718 (1st Cir. 1966); Short v. United States, 344 F.2d 550, 552 (D.C.Cir.1965); United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mercer v. United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners

    312 F. Supp. 1077 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 19, 1970

    See Lawrence v. Willingham, 373 F.2d 731 (10th Cir., 1967); Hogue v. … National Labor Relations Board, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 215 , 376 F.2d 770, 773 (1967), cert. denied Northwest Engineering Co. v. NLRB, 389 U.S. 932 , 88 S.Ct. 297 , 19 L.Ed.2d 285 ; and Gerstenfeld v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Winter v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.

    882 F. Supp. 2d 1113 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 3, 2012

    Johnson v. Medtronic, Inc. at 235 (quoting Brown v. Bay State Abrasives, 821 S.W.2d 531, 533 (Mo.App.1991)); Tennis v. General Motors Corp., 625 S.W.2d 218, 226 (Mo.App. S.D.1981); see also Grady v. … Marx’s findings. ' A second Advisory Board meeting occurred in March 2004. NPC representatives asked the Board members to prepare a “white paper” describing the ONJ problem. According to Dr. Marx, Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Swartz v. Internal Revenue Service

    702 F. Supp. 780 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 8, 1988

    Under the CSRA, judicial review is provided only for actions that are appealable to the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) and which result in a final order or decision. See 5 U.S.C. §§ 7701 and 7703. … See also Walsh v. United States, 588 F.Supp. 523, 526 (N.D.N.Y.1983); Tucker v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bosley v. Kearney R-1 School District

    904 F. Supp. 1006 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 19, 1995

    Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.” … Suggestions at 6 (citing Thelma D. by Delores A. v. Board of Education of The City of St. Louis, 934 F.2d 929, 932-33 (8th Cir.1991); and Jane Doe “A” v. The Special School District of St.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Honeywell v. Village of Lakeside

    604 F. Supp. 932 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 15, 1985

    Bramlet v. Wilson, 495 F.2d 714, 716 (8th Cir.1974). … See Cook v. Kansas City, 358 Mo. 296 , 214 S.W.2d 430 (1948); State ex rel Askew v. Kopp, 330 S.W.2d 882 (Mo.1960); State ex rel Allen v. Barker, 581 S.W.2d 818, 825 (Mo. en banc 1979). 2 . See, Nix v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Oberman & Co. v. Pratt

    16 F. Supp. 887 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 8, 1936

    Pratt, Acting Regional Director, National Labor Relations Board of the Fourteenth Region. … The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, in National Labor Relations Board v. *889 Washington, Virginia and Maryland Coach Company, 85 F.(2d) 990 , has. just reached the same conclusion.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance

    220 F. Supp. 222 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 24, 1963

    British Type Investors, Inc., (S.D.N.Y.) 15 F.Supp. 497 ; Lucania Societa Italiana Di Navigazione v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., (S.D.N.Y.) 15 F.2d 568 ; Greenshields v. … Krispy Kreme Donut Co., (E.D.Tenn.) 208 F.Supp. 479 ; Evans-Hailey Co. v. Crane Co., (M.D.Tenn.) 207 F.Supp. 193 ; F. & L. Drug Corp. v. American Central Ins. Co., (D.Conn.) 200 F.Supp. 718 ; Browne v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Goodlow

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 16, 2026

    Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). … Miller v. Toxicology Lab. Inc., 688 F.3d 928, 931 (8th Cir. 2012). A pro se complaint must be liberally construed, Estelle v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Vietnam Veterans Against War v. Benecke

    63 F.R.D. 675 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 27, 1974

    Kister v. Ohio Board of Regents, supra; Cf. Zahn v. International Paper Company, 414 U.S. 291 , 94 S.Ct. 505 , 38 L.Ed.2d 511 (1973). … Laird v. Tatum, supra; S. v. D., supra; United Public Workers v. Mitchell, supra; Kister v. Ohio Board of Regents, supra; Fifth Avenue Peace Parade Committee v. Gray, supra.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • White v. Wilson

    301 F. Supp. 470 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 6, 1969

    See White v. Swenson, (W.D.Mo.1966 en banc) 261 F.Supp. 42 . On December 27, 1968 the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole granted petitioner a parole effective December 30, 1968. … Peyton v. Rowe, 391 U.S. 54 , 88 S.Ct. 1549 , 20 L.Ed.2d 426 (1968) and Carafas v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Missouri v. National Organization for Women, Inc.

    467 F. Supp. 289 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 16, 1979

    The restraint of trade in Noerr was the result of a valid legislative act, already held nonviolative of the Sherman Act in Parker v. Brown, supra. … Brown “state action” exclusion, and the Noerr “political” exclusion, concerted action to influence lawmakers.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Keeny v. Secretary of the Army

    336 F. Supp. 32 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 21, 1971

    In Rowe v. … . § 723.3 , the Correction Board may “at its discretion, . . . authorize a hearing or . deny an application for correction without a hearing.” In Reed v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.