Case law

Fairyland Amusement Co. v. Metromedia, Inc.

413 F. Supp. 1290 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 24, 1976

See Brown v. Kitterman, 443 S.W.2d 146 (Mo.1969); Langworthy v. Pulitzer Publishing Co., 368 S.W.2d 385 (Mo.1963). … In Brown v.

Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. Western Resources, Inc.

939 F. Supp. 688 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 2, 1996

Hesston Corp. v. Kays, 870 P.2d 17, 40 (Kan.1994). See also, Orzeck v. Englehart, 195 A.2d 375 (Del.1963). … See Flarsheim v.

Peterson v. Braniff Airways, Inc.

424 F. Supp. 1004 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 13, 1977

Co. v. Burley, 325 U.S. 711 , 65 S.Ct. 1282 , 89 L.Ed. 1886 (1945), contains the classic definitions of a “major” and a “minor” dispute. Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad Co. v. … Co. v.

Wolf v. Cassady

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 7, 2019

The statute directs the parole board to hold a hearing to determine whether the defendant should be granted parole. MO. REV. STAT. § 558.047.4. … In making this argument, Petitioner relies on a recent Western District of Missouri case, Brown v. Precythe, No. 2:17-CV-04082-NKL, 2018 WL 4956519 (W.D. Mo. Oct. 12, 2018).

United States ex rel. Bruno v. Sweet

133 F. Supp. 3 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 23, 1955

City, but not under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq., and before any findings or order had been made in that proceeding, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Wong Yang Sung v. … Petitioner appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals, and, thereafter, on March 4, 1955, that Board, by opinion and order in evidence, dismissed the appeal, and affirmed the findings, conclusions and order of special inquiry

Harris v. Ciccone

290 F. Supp. 729 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 13, 1968

Burns v. Wilson, 346 U.S. 137 , 73 S.Ct. 1045 , 97 L.Ed. 1508 ; Swisher v. United States, (C.A. 8) 326 F.2d 97 and 354 F.2d 472 (Second appeal); Burns v. Harris, (C. … Ashe v. McNamara, (C.A. 1) 355 F.2d 277 ; Augenblick v. U. S., (Ct.Cl.) 377 F.2d 586 [ 180 Ct.Cl. 131 ]. 2.

Peters v. Board of Directors of Raytown Consolidated School District No. 2

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 25, 2019

A district court “has discretion in determining and awarding costs in a given case,” Pershern v. Fiatallis N. … Thompson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 472 F.3d 515, 517 (8th Cir. 2006).

Randolph v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co.

68 F. Supp. 1007 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 22, 1946

It was clearly pointed out in the case of Nord v. … The boards created by the Railway Labor Act are administrative boards with quasi judicial power.

Peters v. Board of Directors of Raytown Consolidated School District No. 2

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 6, 2018

) No. 4:18-CV-0816-DGK ) BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF RAYTOWN ) CONSOLIDATED … Landis v. North Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936); Contracting Nw., Inc. v.

McCarty v. Hosang

154 F. Supp. 852 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 30, 1957

May Department Stores Co., 237 Mo.App. 981 , 180 S.W.2d 793 ; Brown v. St. Louis County Gas Co., Mo.App., 131 S.W.2d 354 ; Hart v. Emery, Bird, Thayer Dry Goods Co., 233 Mo.App. 312 , 118 S.W.2d 509 ; Glossip v. … Brown v. St. Louis County Gas Co., supra; Zichler v. St. Louis Public Service Co., supra. The Supreme Court of Missouri lends support to the above position in Zichler v. St.

Peters v. Board of Directors of Raytown Consolidated School District No. 2

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 21, 2019

The Defendants are the members of the school board of education and the district’s superintendent, sued in his official capacity. … Cossette v. Minnesota Power & Light, 188 F.3d 964, 973 (8th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Johnson

682 F. Supp. 1033 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 5, 1988

Brown, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Kansas City, Mo., for Lloyd Johnson. Allen Kent Brown, Kansas City, Mo., for Roy Hutton. … Buckley v.

White v. Caterpillar, Inc.

765 F. Supp. 1418 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 26, 1991

See Rollo v. Blue Cross, Blue Shield of New Jersey, 1990 U.S. Dist. … See Pirozzi v.

Walton v. EDGE MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC

442 F. Supp. 2d 731 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 25, 2006

See id.; NLRB v. Browning-Ferris Indus. of Pennsylvania, Inc., 691 F.2d 1117, 1122 (3rd Cir.1982). … See Baker v. Stuart Broad. Co., 560 F.2d 389, 392 (8th Cir.1977); Jarred v. Walters Indus. Elecs., Inc., 153 F.Supp.2d 1095, 1099 (W.D.Mo.2001); Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n v.

Green v. Camper

477 F. Supp. 758 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 16, 1979

No. 79-8092 (8th Cir. 1979); Clovis Carl Green, Jr. v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, Misc. No. 79-8095 (8th Cir. 1979); Clovis Carl Green, Jr. v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, Misc. … Board of *767 Probation and Parole, No. 30665 (1978); Clovis Carl Green, Jr. v. Board of Probation and Parole, No. 30663 (1978); Clovis Carl Green, Jr. v. Donald W. Wyrick, No. 30665 (1978); Clovis Carl Green, et al. v.

Kramek

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 22, 2026

Brown v. Smith, No. 4:25-CV-01285-RHH, 2025 WL 2799876, at *2 (E.D. Mo. Oct. 2, 2025) (quoting Green v. Byrd, 972 F.3d 997, 1000 (8th Cir. 2020)). … Motors Corp. v. Harry Brown's, LLC, 563 F.3d 312, 319 (8th Cir. 2009). To qualify, the harm must be “certain and great and of such imminence that there is a clear and present need for equitable relief.” Walls v.

Craft v. Settle

205 F. Supp. 775 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 1, 1962

In Kuczynski v. … And see further Weldon v.

Massey v. Emergency Assistance, Inc.

580 F. Supp. 937 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 8, 1983

Bonomo v. … Mas Marques v. Digital Equip. Corp., 490 F.Supp. 56, 58 (D.Mass.1980); Linskey v.

Fortner v. CITY OF ARCHIE, MO.

70 F. Supp. 2d 1028 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 7, 1999

There is no question that legislative bodies, even the Board of Aldermen of a small town, are given immunity for statements and actions taken while performing legislative acts. Bogan v. … In Lee v.

Clevenger v. Weinberger

375 F. Supp. 821 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 22, 1974

Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971). … . § 162 (1970), an enterprise must be profit-motivated, Five Lakes Outing Club v. United States, 468 F.2d 443 (8th Cir. 1972), and that motive must be the principal or dominant motive for the enterprise, Carkhuff v.