Case law

Hillcrest Inv. Co. v. United States

55 F. Supp. 147 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 15, 1944

Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev., 130 F.2d 1003, 1006 . The facts in that case are far different from the facts here being considered. Resolution of the board of directors was made after the debt was contracted. … In the case of Metal Specialty Co. v.

Williams v. Pierpont

315 F. Supp. 1311 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 19, 1970

Shelton v. United States Board of Parole, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 311 , 388 F.2d 567 ; United States ex rel. Buono v. Kenton (C.A. 2) 287 F.2d 534 , cert. den. 368 U.S. 846 , 82 S.Ct. 75 , 7 L.Ed.2d 44 ; Hyser v. … United States v. Gernie (S.D.N.Y.) 228 F.Supp. 329 , involving a delay of some eleven years. See also Shelton v. United States Board of Parole, supra.

Producers Creamery Co. v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.

87 F. Supp. 262 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 9, 1949

Caulfield To Get Off Engine And Go Get Conductor Then Demanded That They Set Out SF 494 Containing 350 10 Gallon Cans Milk From Cabool Missouri Billed Brown Velvet Ice Cream Company New Orleans Set Out And Later Contents … BCRX 702 Loaded With 3950 Gallons Milk Shipped By Brook-haven Creamery Co Wesson Miss Consigned To Cloverland Dairy Products Company New Orleans Was Set Out, After Car Set Out Unknown Persons Opened Car And Drain V-alves

Barnhorst v. Missouri State High School Activities Ass'n

504 F. Supp. 449 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 16, 1980

Plaintiff requested the Board to consider her case under this provision; the Board declined to grant eligibility on a “hardship” basis, because plaintiff and her parents had clearly exercised a choice and because their belief … San Antonio School Dist. v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1, 29 , 93 S.Ct. 1278, 1295 , 36 L.Ed.2d 16, 41 (1973) (quoting Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 493 , 74 S.Ct. 686, 691 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954)).

Gold Cross Ambulance v. City of Kansas City

538 F. Supp. 956 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 7, 1982

Brown v. Brannon, 399 F.Supp. 133, 147 (M.D.N.C.1975), aff’d per curiam, 535 F.2d 1249 (4th Cir. 1976). This is largely an uncharted area of the law. … Brenner v. State Board of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers, Dealers and Salesmen, 413 F.Supp. 639 (E.D.Pa.1976).

Redding v. Vermillion

416 F. Supp. 1181 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 27, 1976

Ex parte Diehl, 255 S.W.2d 54 (Mo.App.1953); Sockei v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 297 F.Supp. 10 (W.D.Mo.1968); Rule 91.01 et seq., V.A.M.R. … Exhaustion of state remedies was required in a similar case, Phifer v. State of Maryland Board of Parole, 395 F.Supp. 831 (D.Md.1975).

Smith v. City of Kansas City, Missouri Board of Police Commissioners

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 1, 2023

Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978); see Jessup v. Luther, 277 F.3d 926, 928 (7th Cir. 2002). … Nixon, 435 U.S. at 598; see, e.g., IDT Corp. v. eBay, 709 F.3d 1220, 1223–24 (8th Cir. 2013) (finding a company’s “confidential and competitively sensitive information” warranted sealing the complaint); Goff v.

Smith v. City of Kansas City, Missouri Board of Police Commissioners

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 9, 2023

Inc. v. Thompson, 478 U.S. 804, 808 (1986). … Schubert v. Auto Owners Ins., 649 F.3d 817, 822 (8th Cir. 2011). And removal based on federal question jurisdiction is governed by the “well-pleaded complaint” rule. See Phipps v.

United States v. Tupper

168 F. Supp. 907 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 17, 1958

The Government urges that the admissibility of the statements taken from defendants under the circumstances as above should be measured by White v. United States, 5 Cir., 200 F.2d 509 ; Brown v. … In Brown v. United States, supra [ 228 F.2d 289 ], Brown was interrogated by state officers in respect to local charges of burglary and made a confession in-respect thereto.

Humphrey v. Wilson

281 F. Supp. 937 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 5, 1968

Sprouse v. Settle, supra. While petitioner was mandatorily released on parole he was still in custody and control of the Board of Parole. … See, Hyser v. Reed (1963) 115 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 318 F.2d 225 , cert. den. Thompson v. United States Board of Parole, 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 446 , 11 L.Ed.2d 315 .

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Middlekamp

1 F.2d 563 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 9, 1921

The Supreme Court of Missouri, in State v. Sullivan, supra, quotes from State ex rel. Brown Contracting & Building Co. v. Cook, 181 Mo. 596 , 80 S. … In State v. Sullivan, supra, the court quotes from Petroleum Co. v.

Packard v. Rollins

307 F. Supp. 1388 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 11, 1969

Noyd v. … A Board similar to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records was involved in Girault v. United States, 133 Ct.Cl. 135 , 135 F.Supp. 521 (Ct.Claims 1955).

Davis v. Bowersox

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 15, 2020

In his Traverse, Davis argues that “the court in Brown v. … See Brown v. Precythe, Eighth Circuit Case No. 19-3019. 5 Similarly, Davis’ request for an evidentiary hearing is premature.

United States v. Stidham

248 F. Supp. 822 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 16, 1965

Dickinson v. … In Cox v.

French v. Ciccone

308 F. Supp. 256 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 13, 1969

Shelton v. United States Board of Parole, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 311 , 388 F.2d 567 ; Hiatt v. Compagna (C.A.5) 178 F.2d 42 ; Berry v. United States Parole Bd. (C.A.3) 266 F.Supp. 667 ; Hauck v. … Hiatt (C.A.3) 141 F.2d 812 ; Brest v. Ciccone (C.A.8) 371 F.2d 981 .

United States v. Jackson County, Mo.

696 F. Supp. 479 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 30, 1988

Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.” … Based on United States v.

Linquist v. Bowen

633 F. Supp. 846 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 18, 1986

United States Railroad Retirement Board v. … Defendants and Denberg v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, 696 F.2d 1193, 1197 (7th Cir.1983), suggest that Weinberger v.

Maggard v. Moore

613 F. Supp. 150 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 27, 1985

Williams v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 661 F.2d 697, 698 (8th Cir.1981). … Smallwood v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 587 F.2d 369 (8th Cir.1978) (Petitioner sought reconsideration of respondent’s decision denying parole.).

Burks v. County of Miller

750 F. Supp. 408 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 4, 1990

Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.” … Callahan v. Board of Probation and Parole, 720 S.W.2d 445, 446 (Mo.App.1986).

In re Grubbs-Wiley Grocery Co.

96 F. 183 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 17, 1899

The facts found by the referee are that at a meeting of the board said Grubbs was employed as manager. … Bennett v. Roofing Co., 19 Mo. App. 349 -351. So it is held in Beach v. Manufacturing Co., 36 Mo.