Case law

Pipeline Productions, Inc. v. S&A Pizza, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 5, 2020

that is, telecommunication companies that carry Internet traffic and electronic bulletin boards.”). B. … V.

Kunin v. Saint Luke's Health System, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 25, 2022

Ashcroft v. … Thayer v.

Norman v. The Central Trust Bank Inc.

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 7, 2019

.”); Simmons v. … United States v.

Washington v. Denney

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 3, 2017

See Hensley v. … .”); Hanig v.

Sheppard v. United States Department of Justice

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 21, 2021

Neely v. … Pinson v.

Webb v. Buckner

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 21, 2024

Stepmother and Brother sat in the living room to play a board game, while Webb was doing something in the kitchen. … V.

Havens Steel Co. v. Randolph Engineering Co.

613 F. Supp. 514 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 7, 1985

Regan Co. v. … V.

Short Creek Development, LLC v. MFA Incorporated

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 6, 2023

United States v. Vertac Chem. … United States v.

Tate v. Astrue

853 F. Supp. 2d 937 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 21, 2012

. § 405 (g); Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971); Mittlestedt v. Apfel, 204 F.3d 847, 850-51 (8th Cir.2000); Johnson v. Chater, 108 F.3d 178, 179 (8th Cir.1997); Andler v. … Nevland v. Apfel, 204 F.3d 853, 857 (8th Cir.2000); Brock v. Apfel, 118 F.Supp.2d 974 (W.D.Mo.2000).

United States v. Watson

293 F. Supp. 694 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 10, 1968

Dunlop v. … V.

Hand v. ARB KC, LLC. <b><font color="red"> DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE. On 9/22/2022, this case was consolidated with 18-cv-00668-NKL. All filings should be docketed in case 18-cv-00668-NKL. </font></b>

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 3, 2019

K–V Pharm. Co. v. J. … Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455 (1980), is instructive on this point.

Smith v. Truman Road Development, LLC

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 31, 2019

Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455 (1980), is instructive on this point. … Jan. 21, 2016) (finding that a Plaintiff could not sustain a TCPA action against a local school board because “conspicuously absent” from the definition of “person” was “any mention of governmental entities, let alone

Owens v. The Central Trust Bank Inc.

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 7, 2019

.”); Simmons v. … United States v.

United States v. Roberts

928 F. Supp. 910 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 17, 1996

The women in numbers 1 and 4 have blonde hair, the woman in number 2 has gray hair, the woman in number 3 has red hair, and the woman in number 5 has brown hair. … V.

Taylor v. KC VIN, LLC

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 3, 2019

Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455 (1980), is instructive on this point. … Jan. 21, 2016) (finding that a Plaintiff could not sustain a TCPA action against a local school board because “conspicuously absent” from the definition of “person” was “any mention of governmental entities, let alone

Missouri Coalition for the Environment v. Wheeler

District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 11, 2020

Brown Grp., Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 553, 116 S.Ct. 1529, 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996)). … In Curry v.

Porters Building Centers, Inc. v. Sprint Lumber, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 2, 2017

Co. v. … Brown v. Rollet Bros. Trucking Co., 291 S.W.3d 766, 777 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009) (internal quotation and citation omitted).

Shipyard Brewing Company, LLC v. Logboat Brewing Company, LLC

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 25, 2018

Entm’t v. X One X Prods., 840 F.3d 971, 980 (8th Cir. 2016); see also Davis v. … Co. v.

Avina v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 9, 2021

Avina’s first position with Defendant was on the Extra Board, which meant Avina did not have a normal shift, but was on call 24 hours a day, seven days a week. … See McKay v. U.S.

Doohan v. CTB Investors, LLC

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 3, 2019

Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455 (1980), is instructive on this point. … Jan. 21, 2016) (finding that a Plaintiff could not sustain a TCPA action against a local school board because “conspicuously absent” from the definition of “person” was “any mention of governmental entities, let alone