Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmowd

1,907 results

1.74s

  • Hold v. Saul

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 22, 2021

    Brown v. Colvin, 825 F.3d 936, 939 (8th Cir. 2016). “Substantial evidence is less than a preponderance, but is enough so that a reasonable mind would find it adequate to support the ALJ’s conclusion.” Singh v. … See Julin v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pipeline Productions, Inc. v. S&A Pizza, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 25, 2022

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1294, at n.12 (4th ed. 2021) (collecting cases); see also Brown v. Fifth Jud. Dist.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Watkins v. Algoa Correctional Facility

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 1, 2022

    Will v. Mich. Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 64, 70 (1989). Consequently, MDOC and Algoa cannot be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Brown v. Mo. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Safeway Stores, Inc. v. LD Schreiber Cheese Company

    326 F. Supp. 504 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 23, 1971

    See: Aubertine v. Finberg, 258 S.W. 46 (Mo.Ct.App. 1924); Leckie v. Bennett, 160 Mo.App. 145 , 141 S.W. 706 (1911); Investors Preferred Life Ins. Co. v. … The minutes of the first meeting of the Board of Directors of the newly-formed Standard Milk Company state that “the corporation was organized for the purpose of acquiring the operating assets and continuing the operation

    Reversed on other grounds by L. D. Schreiber Cheese Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Standard Milk Company, Inc., a Corporation, and Hardware Mutual Casualty Company, 457 F.2d 962 (1972)Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Ragle v. Berryhill

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 21, 2018

    City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of Tacoma, 357 U.S. 320, 336 (1958) (quoting Labor Board v. Cheney California Lumber Co., 327 U.S. 385, 388 (1946)). … Caran v. Bowen, 834 F.2d 720, 721 (8th Cir. 1987).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • FCS Advisors, LLC v. State of Missouri

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 16, 2017

    Part 16, Missouri may appeal adverse decisions by CMS to the federal Departmental Appeals Board and final decisions of the Departmental Appeals Board can be appealed to federal court. Id. … Instead, Plaintiffs argue that Missouri’s option to appeal adverse decisions to an administrative appeals board followed by another option to appeal an appeals board decision to a federal district court is analogous to

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sharma v. Shipman

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 22, 2022

    Brown, Inc. v. Weber Implement & Auto Co., S.W.2d 751, 755 (Mo. 1953). Defendants argue only that Plaintiff cannot show the element of reasonable reliance. … See Orlann v. Laederich, 92 S.W.2d 190, 194 (Mo. 1936).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • McWhirter v. Monroe Calculating MacH. Co.

    76 F. Supp. 456 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 16, 1948

    Roseland v. Phis-ter Mfg. Co., 7 Cir., 125 F.2d 417 , 139 A.L.R. 1013 ; Midland Oil Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co., D.C., 41 F.Supp. 436 . … Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co., 282 U.S. 555 , 51 S.Ct. 248 , 75 L.Ed. 544 ; Roseland v. Phister Mfg. Co., 7 Cir., 125 F.2d 417 , 139 A.L.R. 1013 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Farmer de la Torre v. Catholic Charities of Southern Missouri, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 26, 2025

    Zutz v. Nelson, 601 F.3d 842, 848 (8th Cir. 2010) (citing Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)). … Henley v. Brown, 686 F.3d 634, 642 (8th Cir. 2012).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hounmenou

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 8, 2026

    See Matthews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 332 (1976); see also Perry v. … See Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569– 70 (1972).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mo-Kan Iron Workers Pension Fund v. Challenger Fence Co.

    426 F. Supp. 2d 1001 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 17, 2006

    Laborers’ Pension Fund v. … See, e.g., Id.; Gould v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Vaughan v. Aegis Communications Group, LLC

    49 F. Supp. 3d 613 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 9, 2014

    Massie v. Colvin, 373 S.W.3d 469, 472 (Mo.App.2012). … Many of the victims are ‘trafficked into the international sex trade, often by force, fraud or coercion.’ ” Nunag-Tanedo v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board, 790 F.Supp.2d 1134, 1143 (C.D.Cal.2011); citing, H.R.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Pryor v. Schweiker

    568 F. Supp. 65 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 16, 1983

    Brinker v. Weinberger, 522 F.2d 13, 17 (8th Cir.1975); Timmerman v. Weinberger, 510 F.2d 439, 443 (8th Cir.1975); Brown v. Harris, 548 F.Supp. 399 (W.D.Mo.1982). … Simonson v. Schweiker, 699 F.2d 426 (8th Cir.1983); McDonald v. Schweiker, 698 F.2d 361 (8th Cir.1983); Cole v. Harris, 641 F.2d 613, 615, 616 (8th Cir.1981).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

    643 F. Supp. 470 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 9, 1986

    In NLRB v. … See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 2510 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). The “sketchy beginning” of a contention is no bar to summary judgment. Brown v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Rodden v. Kijakazi

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 18, 2022

    Brown v. Colvin, 825 F.3d 936, 939 (8th Cir. 2016). “Substantial evidence is less than a preponderance, but is enough so that a reasonable mind would find it adequate to support the ALJ’s conclusion.” Singh v. … See McClellan v. Kijakazi, No. 5:20-CV-6083-DGK, 2021 WL 4198390, at *2 (W.D. Mo.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Triangle Electric Supply Co. v. Mojave Electric Co.

    234 F. Supp. 293 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 5, 1964

    Brown was instructed to obtain the customary financial information. … Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co. v. Feutz, 8 Cir., 182 F.2d 752, 756-757 (1950) ; United States v. Phoenix Indemnity Co., 4 Cir., 231 F.2d 573, 575 (1956).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Advanced Micro Targeting, LLC v. Let the Voters Decide, LLC, et al.

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 2, 2025

    Motors Corp. v. Harry Brown’s, LLC, 563 F.3d 312, 319 (8th Cir. 2009). Irreparable harm must be certain and imminent such “that there is a clear and present need for equitable relief.” Iowa Utils. Bd. v. … Registry, Inc. v. A.W.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Stapleton v. Kijakazi

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 8, 2022

    schizophrenia, and posttraumatic stress disorder, but she retained the residual functional capacity (“RFC”) to perform sedentary work with certain restrictions, including work as an optical goods assembler, a circuit board … Wright v. Colvin, 789 F.3d 847, 852 (8th Cir. 2015); see Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gieseking v. Schafer

    672 F. Supp. 1249 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 13, 1987

    See also Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. … Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 206-207 , 102 S.Ct. 3034, 3051 , 73 L.Ed. 2d 690 (1982). 7 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Sitzer v. National Association of Realtors

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 22, 2022

    NAR members consist of over 1,200 local realtor associations or boards and fifty-four state and territorial realtor associations. NAR is governed by a Board of Directors. … Mobile Board of Realtors, Inc., 675 F.3d 671 (5th Cir. 1982) preclude class certification.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.