Case law

Division 1287, Amalgamated Association of Street, Employees of America v. Dalton

206 F. Supp. 629 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 22, 1962

Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 340 U.S. 383 , 71 S.Ct. 359 , 95 L.Ed. 364 , 22 A.L.R. 2d 814 , invalidating a Wisconsin Public Utility Anti-Strike Law which differs from the Missouri King-Thompson Act in that the Wisconsin … Thompson v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., 309 U.S. 478 , 60 S.Ct. 628 , 84 L.Ed. 876 ; Clay v. Sun Ins.

Division 1287, Amalgamated Association of Street, Employees of America v. Dalton

206 F. Supp. 625 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 16, 1961

This is a suit filed by a mass transit workers’ union for a declaratory judgment and for an injunction to enjoin the Governor of Missouri and other State officers (constituting the State Board of Mediation) from taking possession … Justice Holmes in Massachusetts State Grange v.

Independent Bankers Ass'n of America v. Clarke

743 F. Supp. 687 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 15, 1989

Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.” … In State of Texas v.

Luetkemeyer v. Kaufmann

364 F. Supp. 376 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 24, 1973

Child Benefit Theory Plaintiffs place great reliance on the “child benefit theory” spelled out in Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1946); Board of Education v. … Board of Education, supra, and Board of Education v. Allen, supra. The Court’s discussion of those cases in Lemon v.

Vanguard Packaging, Inc. v. Midland Bank

871 F. Supp. 348 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 29, 1994

In support of this position, Plaintiff cites the Court to the 1912 ease of Brown v. Worthington, 162 Mo.App. 508 , 142 S.W. 1082 (1912). … Defendant, at all relevant times, was the chairman of the board and a member of the loan committee at Midland Bank.

Penalosa Cooperative Exchange v. A.S. Polonyi Co.

754 F. Supp. 722 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 2, 1991

Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.” … In Noll v.

J. v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 29, 2017

The Board argues that it can only be liable when the employee’s action was “pursuant to official municipal policy” or custom. Monell v. Dept. … Plaintiff also argues that the Board is liable for failing to direct or otherwise train TAC Team officers in the use of FBGs. City of Canton v.

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Gibson

829 F. Supp. 1110 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 30, 1993

FDIC v. Mintz, 816 F.Supp. 1541, 1546 (S.D.Fla.1993); RTC v. Norris, 830 F.Supp. 351, 359 (S.D.Tex.1993); FDIC v. Brown, 812 F.Supp. 722, 725-26 (S.D.Tex.1992); RTC v. Hecht, 818 F.Supp. 894, 901 (D.Md.1992); FSLIC v. … In FDIC v. Brown, the district court held that the Texas business judgment rule barred RTC’s claims for simple negligence. Brown, 812 F.Supp. at 723 .

Donnell v. Swenson

258 F. Supp. 317 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 4, 1966

(Emphasis Judge Brown’s.) … We know of no case, excepting only the unusual situation presented Judge Brown in Spaulding v.

United States v. Dinwiddie

885 F. Supp. 1299 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 12, 1995

O’Rear testified that: (1) Dinwiddie ran up to Brown, thrust the fetus placard in Brown’s face, and physically mirrored Brown’s movements by moving in any direction Brown moved; (2) Brown eventually was able to reach the … See, e.g., McComb v.

Baryo v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

435 F. Supp. 2d 961 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 19, 2006

Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., and U.S. … Wright v.

In Re Brown

226 B.R. 39 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 15, 1998

226 B.R. 39 (1998) In re Rodney Dewayne BROWN and Debra Elizabeth Brown, Debtors. Norman ROUSE, Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, U.S.A., N.A., Defendant. … In Fidelity Financial Services, Inc. v.

Riccardi v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

215 F. Supp. 687 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 19, 1963

In support of their contention defendants cite American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn, 341 U.S. 6 , 71 S.Ct. 534 , 95 L.Ed. 702 ; Board of Education, etc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. … Co. v. Dyess Furniture Co. (C.A.5), 292 F.2d 232 ; Hackner v. Guaranty Trust Co. (C.A.2), 117 F.2d 95 ; Brown v.

Strickland v. Kansas City, Missouri Board of Police Commissioners

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 10, 2024

The Board is not entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity. As an initial matter, Defendants argue the Board is entitled to Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity because the Board is an agency of the state. … The Eighth Circuit has concluded the “Board does not constitute an arm of the state for purposes of Eleventh Amendment immunity.” Gorman v. Easley, 257 F.3d 738, 745 (8th Cir. 2001), rev’d on other grounds, Barnes v.

Farmer v. Kansas City, Missouri, Board of Police Commissioners

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 2, 2022

Defendant Kansas City, Missouri, Board of Police Commissioners (“Board”) owned and maintained Shoal Creek. (Id. at ¶ 4.) … .”); Sanders v.

United States v. Sousley

453 F. Supp. 754 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 13, 1978

Turner v. … See also, Ehrlich v. United States, 145 F.2d 693 (5th Cir. 1944), another one of the cases cited in Brown’s footnote 2.

Farmer v. Kansas City, Missouri, Board of Police Commissioners

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 2, 2022

Rule 56(c); see also Thomas v. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 275 S.W.3d 748, 791 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008) (citing Richcreek v. Gen. Motors Corp., 908 S.W.2d 772, 775 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Jenkins v. State of Mo.

639 F. Supp. 19 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 16, 1986

Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294, 300 , 75 S.Ct. 753, 756 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955) (Brown II). … Tasby v. Wright, supra at 97; Haycraft v. Board of Education, 585 F.2d 803, 805 (6th Cir.1978); Clark v. Board of Educ. of Little Rock School District, 465 F.2d 1044 (8th Cir.1972).

Lewis v. News-Press & Gazette Co.

782 F. Supp. 1338 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 7, 1992

Operation Rescue, 762 F.Supp. 1521, 1523 (D.Mass.1991) (city officials and police officers); Baron v. Carson, 410 F.Supp. 299, 300 (N.D.Ill.1976) (county health board member). … The court noted that plaintiffs were under a state oath of office and a "constitutionally imposed duty,” after Brown v. Board of Education, to support the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Connealy v. Walsh

412 F. Supp. 146 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 19, 1976

Board of Regents v. Roth, supra. … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, Arnett v. Kennedy, supra; Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 , 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975).