Case law

Snowden v. Kijakazi

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 23, 2024

Jones v. Berryhill, 600 F. App'x 587, 588 (8th Cir. 2017) (citing Gisbrecht, 535 U.S. at 807-08). The Court may also consider hourly rate. … See, e.g., Brown v. Kijakazi, 2023 WL 4947824, at *3 (E.D. Mo. Aug. 3, 2023) (approving § 406(b) attorney’s fees in the amount of $1,385.16 per hour); Porterfield v.

United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.

628 F. Supp. 391 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 9, 1986

[Brown v.] Georgeoff, 562 F.Supp. [1300] at 1315. … Brown v. Georgeoff, supra: Determination as to the availability of declaratory relief is left to the discretion of the Court. C. Wright, & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, Civil § 2759 (2d ed. 1983).

Brazil v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company (Mutual)

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 23, 2020

relevant part, as follows: (1) Occupying means being in or on an auto as a passenger or operator, or being engaged in the immediate act of entering, boarding … .”); see also Brown v. Donham, 900 S.W.2d 630, 633-34 (Mo. banc 1995) (discussing “$100,000 per person limit” and $200,000 “per occurrence limit”). Those cases thus are not instructive here.

United States v. NHC Health Care Corp.

163 F. Supp. 2d 1051 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 17, 2001

Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir.1979); United States v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698, 703 (8th Cir.1978). The summary judgment procedure is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.” … United States v. NHC Healthcare Corp., 115 F.Supp.2d 1149, 1152-53 (W.D.Mo.2000) (citing United States v.

Harrison v. Kansas City Terminal Ry. Co.

36 F. Supp. 434 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 11, 1941

If Congress had intended that tips should be included in the meaning of the word “wages” it would have said so. 5 It intended that the reasonable cost of board and lodging furnished by the employer should be included and … Oases which may be read in this connection are Gross’ Case, 132 Me. 59 , 166 A. 55 ; Sloat v. Rochester Taxicab Co., 177 App.Div. 57 , 163 N.Y.S. 904 ; Zappas v. Roumeliote, 156 Iowa 709 , 137 N.W. 935 ; Polites v.

Salau v. Denton

139 F. Supp. 3d 989 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 8, 2015

Murray v. Lene, 595 F.3d 868, 870 (8th Cir.2010); Rogers v. Bruntrager, 841 F.2d 853, 856 (8th Cir.1988); Brown v. Dills, No. 05-4414-CV-C-NKL, 2007 WL 148851 , at *3 (W.D.Mo. Jan. 12, 2007). … Brown, 2007 WL 148851 , at *3 (citing Swelling v. Westhoff 972 F.2d 199 , 200 (8th Cir.1992)); see, e.g., Quintero Cmty. Ass’n Inc. v.

Vick

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 3, 2026

Id. at 1; see Royal Canin, U.S.A., Inc. v. … Brown v. Wallace, 957 F.2d 564, 566 (8th Cir. 1992); see also Bailey v.

Tarasent, LLC v. AELS Adminstrative Services, LLC

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 14, 2020

Oct. 14, 2014) (holding that trustees and beneficiaries are necessary and indispensable parties in actions involving trust property);2 see also Brown-Thill v. Brown, 929 F. … See Ranger Transp., Inc. v.

Larson v. Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 10, 2018

Brown v. Fred’s, Inc., 494 F.3d 736, 739 (8th Cir. 2007) (citations omitted) (analyzing the parent/subsidiary relationship under a Title VII claim). … IOC-KC shall post the approved notice in conspicuous locations where potential collective action members will see the notice (e.g., time punch clock, break room bulletin board, job notices bulletin board), and the notices

Provisur Technologies, Inc. v. Weber, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 18, 2022

burden of proof on this limitation by focusing on belt accumulation—the same operation [Plaintiff] distinguished in the” inter partes review before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”). … Blackorby v. BNSF Ry. Co., No. 4:13-CV-00908-SRB, 2018 WL 11193334, at *1-2 (W.D. Mo. Feb. 22, 2018) (citing Disc. Tobacco Warehouse, Inc. v.

Speck v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.

583 F. Supp. 325 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 23, 1984

transaction with you for the undersigned or to this agreement or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules, then in effect, of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. or the Board … Geil v.

Boston v. Stanton

450 F. Supp. 1049 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 8, 1978

Alice Jacks dated November 15, 1977 styled “In Re: Lawyer, Client Conflict of Interest;” and *1057 14. a letter to Judge Sprinkle styled “In Re: The more things change the more they remain the same especially for the Black, Brown … As noted in Wycoff v.

Marsalis v. Yellen

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 21, 2024

Gray v. Bicknell, 86 F.3d 1472, 1480 (8th Cir. 1996). … Co. v. Sam Brown Co., 19 F.3d 1259, 1267 (8th Cir. 1994).

MDKC, LLC v. City of Kansas City, Missouri

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 30, 2023

Background Nine Plaintiffs are scheduled to go before the Kansas City, Missouri Board of Zoning Adjustment (“BZA”) on September 12, 2023, to contest Defendants’ denial of their Short … See Pioneer Hi-Bred Int’l, Inc. v. Does, No. 12-06046-CV-SJ-DGK, 2012 WL 12910607, at *1 (W.D. Mo.

Smith II v. Amazon.com, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 31, 2023

Tolan v. Cotton, 572 U.S. 650, 656 (2014); Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 588–89 (1986). … Elbert v. Carter, 903 F.3d 779, 782 (8th Cir. 2018) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Hoxworth v.

Hutson v. Long Bell Lumber Co.

1 F. Supp. 468 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 15, 1932

Justice White (later the Chief Justice) in Walker v. Brown, 165 U. S. 654 -664, 17 S. Ct. 453 , 41 L. Ed. 865 , and by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, speaking through Judge San-born in Pierce v. … Ingram v.

United States v. Sutherland

9 F. Supp. 204 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 27, 1934

Brown v. Houston, 114 U. S. 622 , 5 S. Ct. 1091 , 29 L. Ed. 257 ; Public Utilities Commission v. Landon, 249 U. S. 236, 245 , 39 S. Ct. 268 , 63 L. Ed. 577 . … Coe v. Errol, 116 U. S. 517 , 6 S. Ct. 475 , 29 L. Ed. 715 .

Watts v. State of Missouri Department of Corrections

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 7, 2021

Shirrell v. Saint Francis Med. Ctr., 24 F. Supp. 3d 851, 855–56 (E.D.Mo. 2014); citing Fercello v. County of Ramsey, 612 F.3d 1069, 1077 (8th Cir. 2010); citing Berg v. … See Kempf v. Hennepin Cty., 987 F.3d 1192, 1196 (8th Cir. 2021), citing McDonnell Douglas v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973).

Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. Ream

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 5, 2018

Brown v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., 776 S.W.2d 384, 386-87 (Mo. banc 1989). … Brown, 776 S.W.2d at 388. “Estoppel will not be lightly embraced in an insurance coverage case; it only has application when all elements thereof clearly appear.” Versaw v. Versaw, 202 S.W.3d 638, 650 (Mo.

Mutual Life Ins. v. Benton

34 F. Supp. 859 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 1, 1940

Thayer (Russell) had taken her away when she was six years old and had at first boarded her out and then later had taken her into Mrs. Russell’s bawdy house. … Again, in Greene v.