Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoed

4,318 results

2.02s

  • Jefferson v. Akins

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 23, 2023

    See Dossett v. … P. 41(b); see also Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (a district court has the power to dismiss an action for the plaintiff’s failure to comply with any court order).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cobb v. Carriage House

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 21, 2024

    Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016). See also Brown v. … See also Stone v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Barton v. Astrue

    549 F. Supp. 2d 1106 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 10, 2008

    Briggs, 139 F.3d at 608 ; Browning v. Sullivan, 958 F.2d 817, 821 (8th Cir.1992), citing Cruse, 867 F.2d at 1184 . … Lowe v. Apfel, 226 F.3d 969, 972 (8th Cir.2000) (citing Brown v. Chater, 87 F.3d 963, 966 (8th Cir.1996)); see Hogan v. Apfel, 239 F.3d 958, 962 (8th Cir.2001).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lawrence

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 25, 2025

    Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016). See also Brown v. … See Potter v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Robinson v. Redington

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 21, 2023

    See Romano v. Wyrick, 681 F.2d 555, 556-57 (8th Cir. 1982); see also Brown v. Missouri Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 727 F. Supp. 524, 531 (W.D. Mo. 1989). … See e.g., See Jones v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kisco Co., Inc. v. Verson Allsteel Press Co.

    564 F. Supp. 154 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 26, 1983

    See Priest v. Oehler, 328 Mo. 590 , 41 S.W.2d 783 (1931) and Collins v. Swope, 605 S.W.2d 538 *158 (Mo.App.1980). … The present case is wholly unlike that of Priest v. Oehler, supra, in which every term of the contract had been orally assented to. And Collins v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Arbitration of Controversies between Kanmak Mills, Inc. & Society Brand Hat Co.

    134 F. Supp. 263 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 19, 1955

    In Wright Lumber Co. v. … Colombia v. Cauca Co., 190 U.S. 524 , 23 S.Ct. 704 , 47 L.Ed. 1159 ; New York & Cumberland Ry. Co. v. Myers, 18 How. 246 , 59 U.S. 246 , 15 L.Ed. 380 ; Burchell v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Marston v. Kijakazi

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 30, 2024

    See, e.g., Johnson v. Saul, 4:18-cv-725-PLC, 2021 WL 2413343, at *1 (E.D. Mo. June 14, 2021) (approving § 406(b) attorney’s fees in the amount of $449.00 per hour); Brown v. … Sept. 5, 2023) (approving a fee equivalent to an hourly rate of $2,016.27); Williams v. Kijakazi, 4:22-cv-00358 SPM, 2023 WL 7214047, at *2 (E.D. Mo.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Saali v. Walmart

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 21, 2024

    Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016). See also Brown v. … See also Stone v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rogers v. Massanari

    226 F. Supp. 2d 1040 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 30, 2002

    He stated that he served on the board of directors of a resident's association. This job took up "a lot of my time because of the amount of people in the downtown area who know me and seek my advise." (Tr. 139-40.) … See Cunningham v. Apfel, 222 F.3d 496, 502 (8th Cir.2000).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Tatum v. North American Central School Bus LLC

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 19, 2023

    Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016). See also Brown v. … . §§ 241-242, and that the “statutes do not give rise to a civil action for damages”); Brown v. Express Scripts, 2018 WL 1295482, at *2 (E.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Williams v. United States

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 19, 2022

    United States v. Brown, 915 F.3d 1200, 1201 (8th Cir. 2019). See also 28 U.S.C. … Baranski v. United States, 880 F.3d 951, 955 (8th Cir. 2018). See also Boyd v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Winfield v. Steele

    26 F. Supp. 3d 890 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 12, 2014

    Dataphase Sys. v. CL Sys., 640 F.2d 109, 113-14 (8th Cir.1981) (en banc). In Hill v. … Hill v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 573, 584 , 126 S.Ct. 2096 , 165 L.Ed.2d 44 (2006); Nelson v. Campbell, 541 U.S. 637, 649-50 , 124 S.Ct. 2117 , 158 L.Ed.2d 924 (2004).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Laney v. City of Saint Louis, Missouri

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 28, 2021

    Board of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okla. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). … Board of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., 520 U.S. at 404.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Lewis & Clark Marine, Inc.

    50 F. Supp. 2d 925 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 14, 1999

    Bullis v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 474 F.2d 392, 394 (9th Cir.1973). In Bullis v. … They were hired to board the barge for a short period of time to conduct a fireworks display. After the fireworks display was complete, they were to return to land and their connection to barge was to be terminated.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McGee v. Inman

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 14, 2022

    Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016). See also Brown v. … Brown, 683 F.2d 261, 268 (8th Cir. 1982) (“The United States and its agencies are not proper defendants because of sovereign immunity”).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Swallow v. Corizon, LLC

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 17, 2023

    As of the date of this Order, the bankruptcy stay has been extended to non-debtors in Brown v. Corizon, Inc., et al., 2:22-cv-52-DDN (Doc. 27) and Nachtweih v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Salvatore v. City of Wildwood, Missouri

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 4, 2020

    v. … The Eighth Circuit found that board did not make a satisfactory showing that the regulation was narrowly tailored to serve the board’s interests because it “presented little evidence that forbidding literature distribution

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Burns Prescription Pharmacy, Inc. v. Express Scripts Inc

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 15, 2022

    Dataphase Sys., Inc. v. C L Sys., Inc., 640 F.2d 109, 113 (8th Cir. 1981) (en banc). While the likelihood of success on the merits is the most important factor (Roudachevski v. All-Am. … Motors Corp. v. Harry Brown’s, LLC, 563 F.3d 312, 319 (8th Cir. 2009). The moving party bears the burden of establishing the need for a preliminary injunction. Chlorine Institute, Inc. v. Soo Line R.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Guthrie v. Hampton

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 8, 2025

    Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016); see also Brown v. … Martin v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.