Case law

Kessler v. Amoco Oil Co.

670 F. Supp. 853 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 28, 1987

In Baziz v. Amoco Oil Co., slip op. No. … See Brown v.

Williams v. Stanton

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 20, 2024

O’Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838, 842 (1999); 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A). … Gentry v. Lansdown, 175 F.3d 1082, 1083 (8th Cir. 1999); accord Meador v. Branson, 688 F.3d 433, 435 (8th Cir. 2012).

Mullis v. Dobbs

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 9, 2023

See Ackra Direct Marketing Corp. v. … See Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8th Cir. 1986) (noting that self- represented “litigants are not excused from compliance with substantive and procedural law”).

BIOMETICS, LLC v. New Womyn, Inc.

112 F. Supp. 2d 869 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 29, 2000

Co. v. … See, e.g., Tranor v. Brown, 913 F.Supp. 388, 391 (E.D.Pa. 1996); Black & Decker Corp. v. Amirra, Inc., 909 F.Supp. 633, 636 (W.D.Ark.1995); Verosol B.V. v. Hunter Douglas, Inc., 806 F.Supp. 582, 592 (E.D.Va.1992).

Christisen v. Lance Brannon Trailer Sales, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 18, 2020

(quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011)). … (quoting Daimler AG v. Bauman, 134 S.Ct. 746,754 (2014)).

Griffin v. Dormire

26 F. Supp. 2d 1179 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 31, 1998

United States v. Gibson, 105 F.3d 1229 , 1232 n.2 (8th Cir.1997); United States v. Atkins, 25 F.3d 1401, 1406 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 953 , 115 S.Ct. 371 , 130 L.Ed.2d 322 (1994); United States v. … Brown, 34 F.3d 569, 571-72 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1167 , 115 S.Ct. 1136 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1097 (1995). Ground 1 is without merit. Ground 2.

Simpson v. Cross

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 22, 2021

See Henderson v. … See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009); see also Madewell v.

Seals-Supalus

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 30, 2026

E.g., Seals v. All and Everybody, No. 4:25-cv-01628-MAL (Oct. 30, 2025); Seals- Supalus v. … All and Every Probation & Parole Board Staf [sic] and Businesses in Missouri, No. 4:25-cv-00421-NCC (Mar. 31, 2025). 2 A partial list of other cases he filed includes Seales v. St.

Hopkins v. Michel

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 23, 2024

Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016); see also Brown v. … Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972).

Hurt v. United States

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 23, 2020

Jan. 28, 2020) (lack of proper venue); Hurt v. D.C. Board of Parole, et al., No. 4:20-cv-100-PLC (E.D. Mo. Feb. 20, 2020) (lack of proper venue); Hurt v. American College Dictionary, et al., No. 4:20-cv-101-RLW (E.D. … See Hurt v. D.C. Board of Parole, et al., No. 1:13-cv-5365-LAP (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 11, 2013).

Central Presbyterian Church v. Black Liberation Front

303 F. Supp. 894 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 25, 1969

In Douglas v. … R. v. Chicago Great Western R., 190 F.2d 361 (8th Cir. 1951); Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. v. Randolph, 182 F.2d 996 (8th Cir. 1950); United States v. Aluminum Co. of America, 247 F.Supp. 308 (E.D.

Simpson

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 10, 2026

Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016); see also Brown v. … Martin v.

Jennings v. University City, Missouri, City of

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 22, 2021

Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 460 (1980). It is also undisputed that music, as a form of expression and communication, is protected under the First Amendment. … See also Hill v.

Chicago Truck Drivers v. Brotherhood Labor Leasing

230 F. Supp. 2d 963 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 12, 2002

Chicago Truck Drivers Pension Fund v. Brotherhood Labor Leasing, 974 F.Supp. 751, 756 (E.D.Mo.1997). On March 18, 1998, this judgment was summarily affirmed. Chicago Truck Drivers Pension Fund v. … Id. at 505 & n. 5 (citing Central States, SE & SW Areas Pension Fund v.

Blickenstaff v. Crabtree

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 9, 2024

Solomon v. Petray, 795 F.3d 777, 787 (8th Cir. 2015) (quoting Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004)). … See Brown v. Express Scripts, 2018 WL 1295482, at *2 (E.D. Mo. 2018) (dismissing plaintiff’s claim brought under 18 U.S.C. § 242 because plaintiff had no private right of action); Roberson v.

Watson v. Delaware North

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 26, 2025

Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016); see also Brown v. … Martin v.

Aware Products LLC v. Epicure Medical LLC

District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 9, 2022

Humphreys v. Roche Biomedical Labs., Inc., 990 F.2d 1078, 1081 (8th Cir. 1993). … Sherman v. Winco Fireworks, Inc., 532 F.3d 709, 714-15 (8th Cir. 2008). The discovery of new evidence constitutes “good cause” for seeking leave to amend at this stage of the proceedings. See Brown v.

United States v. Findett Corp.

75 F. Supp. 2d 995 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 15, 1999

See United States v. … See United States v.

Young v. Payne

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 8, 2021

See Levy v. Ohl, 477 F.3d 988, 991 (8 Cir. 2007) (explaining that district court may take judicial notice of public state records); and Stutzka v. … See Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8 Cir. 1986) (stating that district court may dismiss a pro se litigant’s action for failure to comply with a court order on its own initiative).

Armstrong-Bey v. United States of America

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 19, 2024

Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016); see also Brown v. … Iverson v. United States, 973 F.3d 843, 846 (8th Cir. 2020); see also Hinsley v.