Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoed

4,318 results

0.30s

  • Sanders v. Mississippi County

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 1, 2021

    Brown v. Donham, 900 S.W.2d 630, 633 (Mo. banc 1995). “An offer is made when the offer leads the offeree to reasonably believe that an offer has been made.” Brown Mach., Div. of John Brown, Inc. v. … Brown v. Donham, 900 S.W.2d 630, 633 (Mo. banc 1995).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Abt v. Ethicon, Inc.

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 20, 2020

    Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 275 S.W.3d 748, 792 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008) (quoting Nesselrode v. Exec. Beechcraft, Inc., 707 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. 1986)). … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 275 S.W.3d 748, 792 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008) (same); see also Lewis v. Johnson & Johnson, 601 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Durham v. Laborers' Benefits Saint Louis

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 20, 2020

    Farnsworth v. City of Kansas City, Mo., 863 F.2d 33, 34 (8th Cir. 1988); Bunch v. Univ. of Arkansas Bd. of Trustees, 863 F.3d 1062, 1067 (8th Cir. 2017). … The Plan Document provides a procedure for participants to appeal benefit decisions to the Board of Trustees (“the Board”).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rogers v. Doctor

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 19, 2020

    .”); Dudley v. Miles, 597 F. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Stevenson v. Drury

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 16, 2021

    See Popoalii v. Correctional Medical Services, 512 F.3d 488, 497 (8th Cir. 2008). In other words, plaintiff may not amend a complaint by filing separate documents. … See Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803- 04 (8th Cir. 1986) (a district court has the power to dismiss an action for the plaintiff’s failure to comply with any court order); Dudley v. Miles, 597 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Manuel v. Hanning

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 29, 2022

    MANUEL, ) Plaintiff, v. No. 4:21-cv-01428-JAR OFFICER UNKNOWN HANNING, et al., Defendants. … See Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8" Cir. 1986) (stating that district court may dismiss a pro se litigant’s action for failure to comply with a court order on its own initiative).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Howard v. Marsh

    616 F. Supp. 1116 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 11, 1985

    United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711, 716-17 , 103 S.Ct. 1478, 1482-83 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983). … However, a different panel, in Barrett v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hurt v. U.S. Constitution

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 8, 2020

    Jan. 21, 2020); Hurt v. D.C. Board of Parole, et al., 4:20-cv-100-PLC (E.D. Mo. Jan. 21, 2020); Hurt v. American College Dictionary, et al., 4:20-cv-101-RLW (E.D. Mo. Jan. 21, 2020); Hurt v. U.S. … Board of Parole, et al., No. 1:13-cv-5365-LAP (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 11, 2013) (noting that plaintiff has “filed hundreds of lawsuits around the country that [have] been dismissed as frivolous”).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Electro Battery Mfg. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.

    762 F. Supp. 844 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 26, 1991

    Watters, Brown & James, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant. MEMORANDUM LIMBAUGH, District Judge. Plaintiffs Electro Battery Mfg. Co. ("Electro") and Fireman's Fund Insurance Cos. … Third, as was stated in Lazzara v. Howard A.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Anic v. Reno

    114 F. Supp. 2d 871 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 26, 2000

    Wichmer, Brown and Wichmer, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for Petitioner. Michael W. Reap, Jane Rund, Office of U.S. Atty., St. Louis, MO, Lyle D. Jentzer, U.S. Dept. … Cyr v. I.N.S., 229 F.3d 406, 409 (2d Cir.2000); Flores-Miramontes v. INS, 212 F.3d 1133, 1140 (9th Cir.2000); Liang v. INS, 206 F.3d 308, 323 (3d Cir.2000).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Krupka v. Stifel Nicolaus & Company Incorporated

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 11, 2023

    In Estate of Pew v. … ); and Rubin v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gorman v. United States

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 20, 2024

    .”); Brown v. … United States v. Nelson, 55 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Keys v. Fields Food Inc

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 6, 2023

    Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016); see also Brown v. … Martin v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ad Hoc Committee to Save Homer G. Phillips Hospital v. City of St. Louis

    143 F.R.D. 216 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 13, 1992

    Ass’n v. Board of Educ. of Portland, Arkansas School Dist., 446 F.2d 763 , 765 (8th Cir.1971). There is no bright-line numerical test by which the Court can determine when this numerosity requirement is satisfied. … Carson v. Pierce, 719 F.2d at 933 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Obama

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 28, 2026

    See Zerger & Mauer LLP v. … P60005535 v. Burnett, No. 1:25- cv-00191-ACL, Doc. 13 (E.D. Mo. Apr. 2, 2026); Emrit v. Musk, No. 1:25-cv-00008-SNLJ, Doc. 4 (E.D. Mo. Aug. 28, 2025); Emrit v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Enterprise Bank v. Magna Bank of Missouri

    894 F. Supp. 1337 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 16, 1995

    "The Fourteenth Amendment's procedural protection of property is a safeguard of the security of interests that a person has already acquired in specific benefits." *1343 Board of Regents v. … See Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. United States

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 9, 2019

    Brown, 915 F.3d 1200, 1201 (8" Cir. 2019). … Baranski v. United States, 880 F.3d 951, 955 (8" Cir. 2018). See also Boyd v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sheppard v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

    357 F. Supp. 2d 1180 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 20, 2005

    Brown v. Trans World Airlines, 746 F.2d 1354, 1358 (8th Cir.1984) (evidence presented along with a motion for summary judgment, or in response to such a motion, must be of a sort to be admissible at trial). … Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bartlett Trust Co. v. Elliott

    30 F.2d 700 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 12, 1929

    Ed. 477 , the Supreme Court said: “If the taxpayer be given an opportunity to test the validity of the tax at any time before it is made final, whether the proceedings. for review take place before a board having a quasi … Pierce v. Somerset Ry. Co., 171 U. S. 641 , 19 S. Ct. 64 , 43 L. Ed. 316 ; Shepard v. Barron, 194 U., S. 553, 24 S. Ct. 737 , 48 L. Ed. 1115 ; Odea v. Mitchell, 144 Cal. 374 , 77 P. 1020 ; Avery & Sons v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Hartford Underwriter's Ins. Co. v. Estate of Turks

    206 F. Supp. 2d 968 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 30, 2002

    Watters, Brown and James, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for plaintiff. John A. Lally, Aubuchon and Raniere, St. Louis, MO, for defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SHAW, District Judge. … Co. v. Y.L.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.