Case law

United States v. Home Life Ins. Co.

508 F. Supp. 559 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 30, 1980

Plaintiff United States of America has cited Cohen v. … Cohen relied on Toler v. Missouri Ins.

Washington v. St. Louis, Missouri, City of

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 31, 2022

Plaintiff points to no ordinance passed by the Board of Alderman adopting a self- insurance plan that covers her claims. … Plaintiff does not dispute that the Board of Alderman exercises its authority by ordinance; Instead, she argues that the City may adopt a self-insurance plan in ways other than by ordinance by the Board of Alderman.

Bochantin v. Inland Waterways Corp.

96 F. Supp. 234 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 20, 1951

See Lynch v. United States, 2 Cir., 163 F.2d 97 ; Cioffi v. New Zealand Shipping Co., D.C., 80 F.Supp. 98 . In Fine v. … Co. v.

Easy Returns Worldwide, Inc. v. United States

266 F. Supp. 2d 1014 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 19, 2003

Brown III as Deputy Administrator for the Drug Enforcement Administration, Defendants. No. 4:03 CV 555HEA. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. May 19, 2003. Eric D. … Taylor Corp. v. Four Seasons Greetings, LLC 315 F.3d 1039, 1041 (8th Cir.2003)(citing Dataphase Sys., Inc. v. C.L. Sys., Inc., 640 F.2d 109, 112-14 (8th Cir.1981))(en banc). See also, Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc. v.

Killian v. Eaton

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 22, 2021

See Alabama v. Pugh, 438 U.S. 781, 782 (1978); Jackson v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 306 Fed. Appx. 333. 333–34 (8th Cir. 2009). … Spence v. Farrier, 807 F.2d 753, 756 (8th Cir. 1986). As such, due process is satisfied as long as “some evidence supports the decision by the prison disciplinary board.” /d.

Hurt v. United States of America

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 17, 2020

Board of Parole, et al., 4:20-cv-100-PLC (E.D. Mo. Jan. 21, 2020); Hurt v. American College Dictionary, et al., 4:20-cv-101-RLW (E.D. Mo. Jan. 21, 2020); Hurt v. U.S. Constitution, et al., 4:20-cv-525-RLW (E.D. Mo. … See Hurt v. D.C. Board of Parole, et al., No. 1:13-cv-5365-LAP (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 11, 2013).

O'Bryant

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 11, 2026

Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016); see also Brown v. … See Denton v.

Wilkins v. Hann

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 25, 2020

See Baker v. … See also Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8" Cir. 1986) (stating that district court may dismiss a pro se litigant’s action for failure to comply with a court order on its own initiative).

Price v. City of New Madrid

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 16, 2021

See State v. … Board of County Com’rs of Bryan County, Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997) (holding “[w]e have consistently refused to hold municipalities liable under a theory of respondeat superior.”); Monell v. Dep't of Soc.

Trifid Corp. v. National Imagery and Mapping Agency

10 F. Supp. 2d 1087 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 17, 1998

See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 317-18 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979); General Dynamics Corp. v. … Miles & Co., Inc. v. Brown, 910 F.Supp. 1138, 1146 (E.D.Va. 1995).

Hurt v. United States of America

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 18, 2020

All have ' See Hurt v. Bailey Realtor, Inc. LLC, 4:20-cv-99-NAB (E.D. Mo. Jan. 21, 2020); Hurt v. D.C. Board of Parole, et al., 4:20-cv-100-PLC (E.D. Mo. Jan. 21, 2020); Hurt v. … See Hurt v. D.C. Board of Parole, et al., No. 1:13- cv-5365-LAP (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 11, 2013).

Goebel & Company Furniture, LLC, et al. v. Cincinnati Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 5, 2026

Co. v. Sam Brown Co., 19 F.3d 1259, 1267 (8th Cir. 1994). … V at 3-9.

Cunningham v. Thornhill

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 14, 2022

Motors Corp. v. Harry Brown’s, LLC, 563 F.3d 312, 319 (8th Cir. 2009). But a party moving for a temporary restraining order is required to show the threat of irreparable harm. See Baker Elec. Co-op., Inc. v. … See Bandag, Inc. v.

Direct Biologics v. Kimera Labs, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 15, 2020

Curiously, Plaintiff argues that the counterclaim must be dismissed for failure to allege the necessary elements of the claim, citing Brown v. … NTD I, LLC v. Alliant Asset Mgmt. Co., LLC, No. 4:16CV1246 ERW, 2017 WL 605324, at *9 (E.D. Mo. Feb. 15, 2017); Brown v. First Health Grp. Corp., No. 4:07CV01852NLJ, 2009 WL 440489, at *7 (E.D. Mo.

Bowman v. Chambers

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 30, 2022

Brown v. Jacobsen, 2022 WL 2452230, at *5 (D. Mont. July 6, 2022). … Bush v. Bays, 463 F. Supp. 59, 66 (E.D.

Hess v. Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc.

503 F. Supp. 2d 1178 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 20, 2007

Morton v. Hearst Corp., 779 S.W.2d 268, 271 (Mo.Ct. App.1989) (quoting Brown v. Kitterman, 443 S.W.2d 146, 149 (Mo.1969)) (internal quotation omitted). … (citing Brown, 443 S.W.2d at 150 ). "[In] determining whether the statements are defamatory, the court must consider them, not in isolation, but in the context of the entire publication." Id. at 271-72 (citing Buller v.

Robison v. Sanderson

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 22, 2020

See Torti v. … See also Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8th Cir. 1986) (stating that district court may dismiss a pro se litigant’s action for failure to comply with a court order on its own initiative).

Doyne v. Union Elec. Co.

755 F. Supp. 866 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 7, 1991

Behlar v. Smith, 719 F.2d 950, 954 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, University of Arkansas Board of Trustees v. Greer, 466 U.S. 958 , 104 S.Ct. 2169 , 80 L.Ed.2d 552 (1984); Morgan v. … Graefenhain v. Pabst Brewing Company, supra, 870 F.2d at 1210 ; Hagelthorn v. Kennecott Corp., 710 F.2d 76, 87 (2nd Cir.1983); Tribble v.

Reitz v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC.

954 F. Supp. 2d 870 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 27, 2013

Miller v. Redwood Toxicology Lab., Inc., 688 F.3d 928, 931 (8th Cir.2012); Brown v. Intelius, Inc., 2012 WL 5878230 , *2, n. 3 (E.D.Mo. Nov. 21, 2012) (citing Miller, supra.). … Holmes v. Kansas City Missouri Board of Police Commissioners, 364 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Mo.App.2012); Teets v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 272 S.W.3d 455, 461 (Mo.App.2008); see also, Cento v. Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins.

Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains v. Williams

322 F. Supp. 3d 921 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 11, 2018

The memorandum requires that a complication plan provide for a board-certified or board-eligible OB/GYN to be "available twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week to treat complications related to abortion drugs prescribed … Similarly, in Virginia v.