Case law

Jones v. Acott

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 6, 2025

Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016); see also Brown v. … Martin v.

Sanders v. Dobbs

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 4, 2022

P. 41(b); see also Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (a district court has the power to dismiss an action where the plaintiff fails to comply with any court order); Dudley v. Miles, 597 F.

AMERICAN STATES INS. v. Boycom Cable Vision, Inc.

336 F. Supp. 2d 950 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 3, 2004

See Canada v. Union Elec. Co., 135 F.3d 1211, 1212 (8th Cir.1997). … Secura Insurance Co. v. J.R. Saunders, 227 F.3d 1077, 1080 (8th Cir.2000) (quoting H & H Manufacturing Co. v. Cimarron Insurance Co., 302 S.W.2d 39, 43 (Mo.Ct.App.1957)).

Jones v. Cape Co. Sheriff Department

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 25, 2025

Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016) (citation modified) (quoting Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678); see also Brown v. … Mick v.

Martin v. St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 7, 2025

Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016) (citation modified) (quoting Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678); see also Brown v. … See Ketchum v.

Coleman v. United States

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 24, 2021

L.R. 2.06(A) (“All actions brought ' See woes v. Coleman, No. 1:14-cr-29-SNLJ (E.D. Mo.); and United States v. Coleman, No. 1:14-cr-80-SNLJ (E.D. Mo.). … See Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8 Cir. 1986) (stating that district court may dismiss a pro se litigant’s action for failure to comply with a court order on its own initiative).

Calloway v. Union Pacific R. Co.

929 F. Supp. 1280 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 1, 1996

Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 10 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2847 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1982). … See, e.g., Penrod Drilling Corp. v. Granite State Ins. Co., 764 F.Supp. 1146, 1147 (S.D.Tex.1990); IMCO USA, Inc. v. Title Ins. Co., 729 F.Supp. 1322, 1324 (M.D.Fla.1990); Hom v.

Terre Du Lac Ass'n, Inc. v. Terre Du Lac, Inc.

601 F. Supp. 257 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 31, 1984

In Warth v. … One defendant is also a board member of the plaintiff association. As noted in Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v.

Williams v. Keen

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 16, 2021

Compare [ECF No. 1] to Williams v. Keen, 4:21-CV-534-SRC (E.D. Mo.) [ECF No. 8]. … P. 41(b); see also Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (a district court has the power to dismiss an action for the plaintiff's failure to comply with any court order); Dudley v. Miles, 597 F.

Clemens v. Local One, Service Employees International Union

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 23, 2019

See Nolan v. … , and appeal to the International Executive Board.

United States v. Stanec

914 F. Supp. 322 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 27, 1995

Lemon v. Kurtzman, 411 U.S. 192, 200 , 93 S.Ct. 1463, 1469 , 36 L.Ed.2d 151 (1973); Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 15 , 27 n. 10, 91 S.Ct. 1267, 1275 , 1282 n. 10, 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971). … See United States v.

Roberson v. Velda City Police Department

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 21, 2020

See Marsh v. … See also Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8" Cir. 1986) (stating that district court may dismiss a pro se litigant’s action for failure to comply with a court order on its own initiative).

Wert v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.

634 F. Supp. 401 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 21, 1986

James, Brown, James & Rabbitt, St. Louis, Mo., for third party defendant ILC Industries. John J. Horgan, Moser, Marsalek, Carpenter, Cleary, Jaeckel & Keaney, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant ACCO Babcock, Inc. Ronald C. … See Foster v. United States, 768 F.2d 1278, 1282 (11th Cir.1985); Saloomey v. Jeppesen & Co., 707 F.2d 671, 678 (2d Cir.1983); Cousins v.

Johnson v. National Credit Management

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 2, 2020

JOHNSON, ) Plaintiff, v. … See also Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8" Cir. 1986) (stating that district court may dismiss a pro se litigant’s action for failure to comply with a court order on its own initiative).

Quick Erectors, Inc. v. Seattle Bronze Corp.

524 F. Supp. 351 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 30, 1981

Friedrich v. Whittaker Corp., 467 F.Supp. 1012 (S.D.Tex.1979); Perrin v. Walker, 385 F.Supp. 945 (E.D.Ill.1974); Transport Indemnity Co. v. Financial Trust Co., 339 F.Supp. 405 (C.D.Cal.1972); Crocker v. A. B. … Contracting Corp. v. City of New York, 286 A.D. 435 , 142 N.Y.S.2d 508 (App.Div.1955), aff'd, 2 N.Y.2d 924 , 161 N.Y.S.2d 888 , 141 N.E.2d 918 (N.Y.1957); Driscoll v. Board of Education, 98 N.Y.S.2d 610 (Sup.Ct.1950).

Peabody Holding Co., Inc. v. Costain Group PLC

808 F. Supp. 1425 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 11, 1992

Louis, MO, Michael Rowe Feagley, Priscilla Peterson Weaver, Michele Louise Odorizzi, Mayer and Brown, Chicago, IL, for defendants Costain Group PLC, Richard Costain (Holdings) Ltd., Costain America Inc. and Peter Costain. … Co. v.

Greene v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 1, 2025

See Greene v. Sprint Nextel Corp., 750 Fed. … Plaintiff states that on July 2, 2022, at the bus stop at Cesar Chavez Avenue and Alameda Street, the Metro Bus driver would not allow him to board the bus because he had a rolling cart.

Gregory v. Pritchett

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 1, 2022

Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8" Cir. 2016). See also Brown v. … Fingerhut Corp., 86 F.3d 852, 856 (8" Cir. 1996) (explaining that, in general, a pro se party is not excused “from complying with a court’s orders and with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); and Brown v.

Droste v. Julien

421 F. Supp. 2d 1188 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 13, 2006

further were ordered to pay Defendant Julien the sum of $4,176.00, representing the fees and costs he incurred in overseeing Plaintiff's' efforts to comply with the Court's earlier Order, and to pay the law firm of Lucco & Brown … Chicago Export Packing Co. v.

Hill v. United States

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 3, 2021

See Nichols v. Symmes, 553 F.3d 647, 649 (8 Cir. 2009). However, the petition Petitioner appears to be referring to Kayfez v. Gasele, 993 F.2d 1288 (7 Cir. 1993) and Willis v. … P. 41(b); and Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8" Cir. 1986) (stating that district court may dismiss a pro se litigant’s action for failure to comply with a court order on its own initiative).