Case law

United States v. Johnson

721 F. Supp. 1077 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 15, 1989

United States v. Johnson, 873 F.2d 1137, 1140 (8th Cir.1989). The appellate court then instructed this Court to either grant a new trial if a Batson v. … Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co., 860 F.2d 1308, 1314 (5th Cir. 1988); Fludd v. Dykes, 863 F.2d 822, 829 (11th Cir.1989). [2] "Jury Selection, An Attorney's Guide to Jury Law and Methods," by V.

Rhone v. US Dept. of Army

665 F. Supp. 734 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 10, 1987

The case involves an appeal of a Merit System Protection Board ruling and was transferred to this Court from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit pursuant to Williams v. … Mantolete v.

James River Ins. Co. v. Impact Strategies, Inc.

699 F. Supp. 2d 1086 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 16, 2010

Moss, Brown and James, P.C., St. Louis, MO, Seth M. Jaffe, Timothy J. Fagan, Smithamundsen LLC, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. John A. Bruegger, Knapp and Ohl, Edwardsville, IL, Robert F. Murray, Thomas A. … James River cites Scottsdale Insurance Co. v.

Morrow v. Turner

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 6, 2023

) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … P. 41(b); Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8th Cir. 1986) (“A district court has the power under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) to dismiss an action for the plaintiffs failure to comply with any court order[.]”).

Austell v. City of Pagedale

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 21, 2023

(citing Mattes v. ABC Plastics, Inc., 323 F.3d 695, 698 (8th Cir. 2003)); see also Zutz v. Nelson, 601 F.3d 842, 850-51 (8th Cir. 2010) (applying pleading standard from Bell Atl. Corp. v. … See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97,106 (1976).

Ayers v. Rone

852 F. Supp. 18 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 8, 1994

Co. v. Null, 554 F.2d 896, 901 (8th Cir.1977). … Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 742 F.2d 482 (8th Cir.1984). Furthermore, plaintiff must show that there was no rational basis for the alleged differences in treatment. Flittie v.

Buckner v. Shaffer

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 7, 2023

) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … P. 41(b); see also Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (a district court has the power to dismiss an action for the plaintiffs failure to comply with any court order).

In re St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.

46 F. Supp. 120 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 25, 1942

Co., 39 F.Supp. 436 ; also, Consolidated Rock Products Company v. Du Bois, 312 U.S. 510 , 61 S.Ct. 675 , 85 L.Ed. 982 . … Morgan’s Co. v. Texas Central Railway, 137 U.S. 171 , 11 S.Ct. 61 , 34 L.Ed. 625 ; Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. Doud, 8 Cir., 105 F. 123 , 52 L.R.A. 481 ; Southern Development Co. v.

Oliver v. Precythe

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 13, 2023

P. 41(b); see also Link v. Wabash R.R. … v.

Owens v. Charleston Housing Authority

336 F. Supp. 2d 934 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 23, 2004

Missouri National Education Association v. Missouri State Board of Education, 34 S.W.3d 266, 275 (Mo.Ct.App.2000) (internal citations omitted). … See Day v.

ST. LOUIS FED. SAV. AND LOAN v. Silverado Banking

626 F. Supp. 379 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 27, 1986

Wise, Chairman of the Board of Silverado, traveled to the home office of St. Louis Federal in Clayton, Missouri. There, they solicited St. Louis Federal's participation in the construction loans. … State ex rel Farmland Industries, Inc. v. Elliott, 560 S.W. 60 , 63 (Mo. Ct.App.1977). See also Charles Schmitt and Co. v. Barrett, 670 F.2d 802 (8th Cir. 1982); Greycas, Inc. v.

Libertus v. Harris

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 22, 2023

In Brown v. Hancock, No. 4:10-cv-2045-HEA, 2011 WL 4528459, *2 (E.D. Mo. … Defendants state that after Brown, this Court “recognized that §516.145 R.S.Mo. provides the applicable limitations period for §1983 claims brought by offenders.” (Defs. Mot. at 5) (citing Roberts v.

Sacorey Clark v. United States of America

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 16, 2026

United States v. Clark, No. 4:16-cr-00107-JAR (E.D. Mo. 2016). … United States v.

Fuget v. United States

District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 29, 2024

See United States v. Brown, No. 24-1866 (8th Cir.). That appeal is still pending.1 “Ordinarily resort cannot be had to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 or habeas corpus while an appeal from conviction is pending.” … Masters v. Eide, 353 F.2d 517, 518 (8th Cir. 1965) (per curiam) (citation omitted). An exception to this rule exists for “extraordinary circumstances.” Womack v. United States, 395 F.2d 630, 631 (D.C. Cir. 1968).

Pineywoods Title, LLC v. Best Deal Motors, LLC

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 30, 2024

Motors Corp. v. Harry Brown’s, LLC, 563 F.3d 312, 319 (8th Cir. 2009). Economic loss, on its own, is not an irreparable injury. DISH Network Serv. L.L.C. v. … Motors Corp. v. Harry Brown’s LLC, 563 F.3d 312, 319 (8th Cir. 2009).

Boykins v. Vandergriff

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 14, 2022

) Petitioner, ) ) v. … P. 41(b); see also Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (a district court has the power to dismiss an action for the plaintiffs failure to comply with any court order).

United States v. Cammisano

690 F. Supp. 847 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 30, 1988

Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, 416 U.S. 696, 711 , 94 S.Ct. 2006, 2016 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974). In the present case, the amendments were in effect both at the time of the indictment and the trial. … See United States v. Holley, 818 F.2d 351 (5th Cir.1987); United States v. Orellanes, 809 F.2d 1526 (11th Cir.1987). The United States relies on the decision in United States v.

Alexander

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 28, 2026

P. 41(b); see also Link v. Wabash R.R. … manage their own affairs so as to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases”); Brown vy.

Harbit v. Buckner

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 4, 2023

Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133, 141 (2005). … Brown v. Luebbers, 371 F.3d 458, 461 (8th Cir. 2004) (citing Early v. Packer, 537 U.S. 3, 8 (2002)).

Simpher v. Saul

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 8, 2020

See Brown v. Barnhart, 282 F.3d 580, 581 (8th Cir. 2002). It is appropriate to reverse and remand this case in order to permit the Commissioner to take further action as requested in his motion.