Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoed

4,318 results

3.12s

  • Wieland v. United States Department of Health & Human Services

    978 F. Supp. 2d 1008 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 16, 2013

    Allen v. … See Annex Med., Inc. v. Sebelius, 2013 WL 1276025 (8th Cir.2013) (unpublished); O’Brien v. U.S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Valentin v. Sentry Security

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 17, 2024

    VALENTIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. … .”); Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8th Cir. 1986) (“A district court has the power under Fed. R. Civ.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Woody v. STERLING ALUMINUM PRODUCTS INCORPORATED

    244 F. Supp. 84 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 21, 1965

    However, jurisdiction over these matters is committed in the first instance to the National Labor Relations Board and not to this Court. San Diego Building Trades Council et al. v. … See Rinker v. Local Union No. 24 of Amal. Lithographers, D.C., 201 F.Supp. 204 (1962), dismissed as then nonappealable 313 F.2d 956 . See also Tomko v. Hilbert, 3 Cir., 288 F.2d 625 (1961), Horn v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Walker v. O'Malley

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 25, 2024

    See Brown v. Barnhart, 282 F.3d 580, 581 (8th Cir. 2002).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Meramec Valley Bank

    259 F. Supp. 2d 922 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 10, 2003

    Watters, Brown and James, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff. Michael A. Campbell, Christopher J. Rausch, Llynn K. White, Polsinelli and Shalton, St. Louis, MO, Dennis E. O, Senior Partner, Bryan Cave LLP, St. … Wood v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am., 980 S.W.2d 43, 48 (Mo.Ct.App.1998); Killian v. Tharp, 919 S.W.2d 19, 21 (Mo.Ct. App.1996).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • AMERICAN RIVER TRANS. v. Paragon Marine Services

    213 F. Supp. 2d 1035 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 30, 2002

    In exhibits 108, 109, 110 and 111, barges knocked out a fleet are shaded green, moored barges that stayed in the fleet are white, and the fleet barges are shaded brown. 33. … Question: Did you see anybody or any persons board the Valley Main Fleet and turn loose the ING 5565 Answer: No, sir, I did not. (Vol.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc.

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 16, 2024

    See Miller v. … Fisher, 239 S.W.3d at 701; Pikey, 203 S.W.3d at 825; Brown, 856 S.W.2d at 56-57; Baugher v. Gates Rubber Co., Inc., 863 S.W.2d 905, 907- 14 (Mo.App.E.D, 1993).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Berry III v. 21st Circuit Court of the State of Missouri

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 19, 2020

    Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Bhd. of Teamsters, 415 U.S. 423, 439 (1974) (internal citation omitted). … Mazurek v. Armstrong, 520 U.S. 968, 972 (1997). Here, Berry has failed to carry the burden of persuasion.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Tolden v. The City's Finest, LLC

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 24, 2025

    .”); Farraj v. Cunningham, 659 F. App’x 925, 927 (9th Cir. 2016) (mem.) (affirming the district court’s dismissal of plaintiff's complaint “based on his failure to oppose the motions to dismiss”); see also Brown v. … v. Fin. Stability Oversight Council, 865 F.3d 661, 667 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (explaining “our adversarial system relies on the arguments presented in the parties’ briefs”); cf Terrell v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Industrial Wire Products v. Teamsters Local Union

    195 F. Supp. 2d 1150 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 12, 2002

    Hormel & Co. v. … Teamsters v. Industrial Wire, 186 F.3d at 882 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gorsuch v. Formtek Metal Forming, Inc.

    803 F. Supp. 2d 1016 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 25, 2011

    However, these employees held no stock in FMF, no ownership interest in FMF, no influence with the Board of Directors of FMF. … See, Helms v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bartis v. John Bommarito Oldsmobile-Cadillac, Inc.

    626 F. Supp. 2d 994 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 4, 2009

    See Saffels v. … See Brown v. L & P Indus., No. 5:04CV379JLH, 2005 WL 3503637 (E.D.Ark.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Felts v. Green

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 1, 2020

    Louis City resident, President of the Board of Aldermen.” … See Sorrell v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Keys v. Presbyterian Children's Home and Services

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 28, 2024

    P. 41(b); see also Link v. Wabash R.R. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Southwestern Bell Telephone v. Missouri Public Service Commission

    461 F. Supp. 2d 1055 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 14, 2006

    In Global NAPs, the Second Circuit was required to determine, inter alia, whether the Vermont Public Service Board "overstepped its authority in concluding that Board-determined calling areas govern whether traffic is subject … Global NAPs, Inc. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Two Palms Software v. Worldwide Freight Management

    780 F. Supp. 2d 916 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 18, 2011

    Michael Ward, Brown and James, P.C., Debbie S. Champion, Dean A. Stark, Rynearson and Suess, L.L.C., St. Louis, MO, for Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CAROL E. JACKSON, District Judge. … See Goldberg v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • JOSEPH MICHAEL DEVON ENGEL v. JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFF, DEPARTMENT, et al.

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 11, 2026

    MICHAEL DEVON ENGEL ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. … See Brown v. Rico Defendants Named & Unnamed, 2026 WL 1715966 at *1 (E.D. Mo. June 12, 2026) (construing a motion to reopen as a request for relief under Rule 60).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Phillips v. Unknown Chief Medical Officer

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 20, 2024

    P. 41(b); Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (a district court has the power to dismiss an action for the plaintiff’s failure to comply with any court order).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jones v. City of St. Louis

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 12, 2022

    Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016). See also Brown v. … Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 148 n. 1 (1984) (noting a rebuttable presumption that a claimant receives correspondence from an agency three days after it was mailed); but see, Barnes v. Riverside Seat Co., 46 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Miller v. McBee

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 13, 2024

    Gilmore v. Armontrout, 861 F.2d 1061, 1065 (8th Cir. 1988). … Teter v. State, 893 S.W.2d 405 (Mo Ct. App. 1995) (quoting Wood v. State, 853 S.W.2d 369, 370 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)). “The proper remedy” for claims challenging parole revocation “is habeas corpus.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.