Opinion

Walker v. O'Malley

Court
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Filed
Jul 25, 2024
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 31.5%

The opinion

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION

SHANRECKIA LANELL WALKER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) Case No. 1:24 CV00058 ACL

)

MARTIN O’MALLEY, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of Defendant’s final decision

denying Plaintiff’s application for benefits under the Social Security Act. Currently pending is

Defendant’s Motion to Reverse and Remand. (Doc. 11.)

In his motion, Defendant requests that the Court reverse the decision of the administrative

law judge (“ALJ”) and remand this action to Defendant pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §

405(g). Defendant states that, after careful review of the above-captioned case, agency counsel

determined that remand was necessary for further evaluation of Plaintiff’s claim. Defendant

indicates that, upon remand, the agency will take further action to complete the administrative

record and issue a new decision.

Plaintiff has not filed a Response, and the time for doing so has expired.

Sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) states that “[t]he court shall have power to enter,

upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing

the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a

rehearing.” In order for the Court to properly remand a case to the Commissioner pursuant to

sentence four, the Court must enter an order wither affirming. modifying, or reversing the

Commissioner’s decision. See Brown v. Barnhart, 282 F.3d 580, 581 (8th Cir. 2002).

The undersigned believes that it is appropriate to reverse and remand this case in order to

permit the Commissioner to take further action as requested in his motion.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Reverse and Remand (Doc. 11)

is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and this

cause be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42

U.S.C. § 405(g) for those reasons set forth in this Memorandum and Order. A separate written

Judgment will be entered in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant.

Urb, Outen Leone

ABBIE CRITES-LEONI

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dated this 25" day of July, 2024.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.