Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoed

4,318 results

0.72s

  • One Suzie-Q Corp. v. Secura Ins. Co.

    198 F. Supp. 2d 1105 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 18, 2002

    Maguire, Brown and James, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LIMBAUGH, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on defendant's motion for summary judgment (# 27). … Co. v. Null, 554 F.2d 896, 901 (8th Cir.1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • King v. Alco Controls Co.

    565 F. Supp. 50 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 2, 1983

    San Diego Unions v. … Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 , 92 S.Ct. 594 , 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972); Haggy v. Solem, 547 F.2d 1363 (8th Cir.1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Koch Engineering Co. v. Gibraltar Cas. Co.

    878 F. Supp. 1286 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 10, 1995

    James, President, William Rutherford, Partner, Brown and James, St. Louis, MO, for Intern. Ins. Co. John G. Doyen, Brinker and Doyen, St. Louis, MO, for Aetna Cas. and Sur. … Laster v. State Farm Fire & Casualty, 693 S.W.2d 195, 197 (Mo.App.1985).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Chemtech Industries, Inc. v. Goldman Financial Group, Inc.

    156 F.R.D. 181 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 18, 1994

    See Carden v. … The material factual issues identified by the Court include: 1) the nature of the action, if any, approved by the Chemtech Board of Directors on July 25, 1990; 2) whether the merger approved by the Chemtech Board of Directors

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Caldwell v. Camp

    455 F. Supp. 270 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 25, 1978

    First, he contends that Younger v. … Younger v. Harris, supra. Since there has been no showing of an inadequate remedy at law within the meaning of Younger v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Two Thousand Three Hundred Fifty-Five Dollars & Ninety-Six Cents

    647 F. Supp. 1460 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 19, 1986

    United States v. Thirteen Thousand Dollars in United States Currency, 733 F.2d 581, 584 (8th Cir.1984); United States v. … United States v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Stallings v. The Procter & Gamble Company

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 21, 2021

    Brown v. Seitz Foods, Inc. Disability Benefit Plan, 140 F.3d 1198, 1200 (8th Cir. 1998); see also Buzzanga v. Life Ins. Co. of North America, No. 4:09-cv-1353-CEJ, 2010 WL 1141344, at *2 (E. D. Mo. … Leirer v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Tuggle

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 23, 2026

    K-V Pharm. Co. v. J. … Brown confer jurisdiction, but the complaint will be dismissed if it ‘appear[s] to a legal certainty St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. USEEOC

    922 F. Supp. 235 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 16, 1996

    Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 317-318 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1725-1726 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979); General Dynamics Corp. v. … Brown, 441 U.S. at 317-18, 99 S.Ct. at 1725-26 ; Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. 138, 142 , 93 S.Ct. 1241, 1244 , 36 L.Ed.2d 106 (1972).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

    52 F.R.D. 276 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 9, 1971

    In Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. … Act to the National Mediation Board. In Howard v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., 361 F.2d 905 (8th Cir. 1966), the train porters sought to be classified as brakemen.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Kettler v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 30, 2024

    MSD also asserts Politte lacks personal knowledge of the Board of Trustees’ actions. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mayes v. Lewis

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 11, 2020

    Petitioner’s § 2254 petition claimed that the trial court had erred in refusing to allow the defense to cross-examine state witness Maurice Brown on Brown’s statement to police; that the trial court had erred in refusing … Finally, petitioner argues that his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated when he was denied an opportunity to cross-examine witness Maurice Brown regarding a statement Brown made to the police.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Garvin v. Postmaster, United States Postal Service

    553 F. Supp. 684 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 9, 1982

    Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). 29 C.F.R. § 1613.214 (a)(1) provides the procedures that a complainant must follow in order to file a claim of discrimination with the EEOC. … Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co., 415 U.S. 36 , 94 S.Ct. 1011 , 39 L.Ed.2d 147 (1974). The importance of encouraging settlements was recognized by the court in Strozier v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Harris v. United States

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 20, 2024

    See Brown v. United States, 151 F.3d 800, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1998). … United States v. Johnson, 481 U.S. 681, 689 (1987). “Where injuries are incurred incident to service, dismissal is required.” Brown, 151 F.3d at 803 (citing Miller v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Three Rivers Rock Company v. M/V MARTIN

    401 F. Supp. 15 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 30, 1975

    Although there is some evidence from which one might infer that the M/V Martin struck the M/V Fair Lady, this Court finds that the M/V Martin did not strike the M/V Fair Lady. 13. … Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc. v. Zapata Off-Shore Company, 377 F.2d 724 (5th Cir. 1967) involved a collision between a barge and an off-shore drilling well. Mid-America Transportation Company, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Rand v. Swenson

    365 F. Supp. 1294 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 24, 1973

    Let the record show I object to the Instruction No. 8, based on State v. Brown.' … Pate v. Robinson, supra; Hansford v. United States, supra.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rogers v. Frank

    782 F. Supp. 91 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 23, 1992

    Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). Plaintiff bears the initial burden of establishing a prima facie case of reprisal. Womack v. … Jackson v. Saint Joseph State Hosp., 840 F.2d 1387, 1390 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 892 , 109 S.Ct. 228 , 102 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Armco Steel Corp.

    359 F. Supp. 760 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 4, 1973

    LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. ARMCO STEEL CORPORATION, an Ohio steel corporation, Defendant. PULLMAN INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. … Moser, Marsalek, Carpenter, Cleary, Jaeckel, Keaney & Brown, St. Louis, Mo., for Armco Steel Corp. and Maryland Casualty. Evans & Dixon, St.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 788

    415 F. Supp. 662 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 27, 1976

    Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, 421 U.S. 454 , 95 S.Ct. 1716 , 44 L.Ed.2d 295 , 10 F.E.P. Cases, 817, 820 (1975); Butler v. Local # 823, Int. Bro. of Teamsters, etc., 514 F.2d 442 (8th Cir., 1975); and Wright v. … Jamison v. Olga Coal Company, supra, at 463.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Building & Const. Tr. Coun. of St. Louis, Mo.

    271 F. Supp. 447 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 26, 1966

    Co. v. … See the majority opinions in Wheeldin v. Wheeler and Romero v. International Term. Operating Co., supra.

    Cited 21 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.