Case law

Architectural Resources, Inc. v. Rakey

912 S.W.2d 676 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 1995

Brown v. McIBS, Inc., 722 S.W.2d 337, 342 [7] (Mo. App.1986). An item is not taxable as costs unless it is specifically authorized by statute, or by agreement of the parties. Groves v. … Brown, 820 S.W.2d at 340 (quoting Johnson v. Mercantile Trust Company National Association, 510 S.W.2d 33, 40 [6] (Mo.1974)) (emphasis ours).

Dolan v. Missouri Town Mutual Fire Insurance

88 Mo. App. 666 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1900

March v. Ins. Co., 186 Pa. St. 629; Brown v. Ins. Co., 172 Mass. 498 . 2. Plaintiff’s instructions, in effect, recognize this, but they submit the materiality of the risk to the jury. We think this was error. … March v. Ins. Co., and Brown v. Ins. Co., supra. 3. Further, or additional insurance, in any substantial sum, is plainly material. Aloe v. Ins. Co., 147 Mo. 561, 579 ; Hutchison v. Ins. Co., 21 Mo. 97 ; Barnard v. Ins.

Bezayiff v. City of St. Louis

963 S.W.2d 225 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 1997

In Radcliff v. … In Perez v.

State v. Fetterhoff

739 S.W.2d 573 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 1987

In People v. Brown, a police officer stopped the defendant for a traffic violation. … People v. Brown, 236 CaLRptr. at 507-08. See also Luke v. State, 178 Ga.

Tuft v. City of St. Louis

936 S.W.2d 113 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 1997

We held that the final agreement between the school board and the superintendent was not a communication between the board and its attorneys and thus ruled the exception of § 610.021(1) inapplicable. 778 S.W.2d at 354 . … Lora v. Director of Revenue, 618 S.W.2d 630, 633 (Mo.1981); J.S. DeWeese Co. v. Hughes-Treitler Mfg. Corp., 881 S.W.2d 638, 643 (Mo.App.1994).

Lorenz v. City of Florissant, Mo.

747 S.W.2d 222 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 1988

’, and villages’ boards of zoning adjustment). … See, e.g., McClain v. Board of Adjustment of the City of St. Louis, 508 S.W.2d 301 (Mo.App.1974); Standard Oil Division of Amoco Oil Co. v. City of Florissant, 607 S.W.2d 854 (Mo.App.1980); Alpha Portland Cement Co. v.

White v. Ballou

755 S.W.2d 246 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 3, 1988

Ballou rests exclusively in the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). … Ballou relies on NLRB v.

State ex rel. Kemper v. St. Louis, Kansas City, & Northern Railway Co.

9 Mo. App. 532 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 1881

Louis v. Allen, 13 Mo. 400, 412 ; St. Louis v. Russell, 9 Mo. 507 . … The State v.

State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. City of Sullivan

520 S.W.2d 186 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1975

Therefore, a contract even though signed by the Mayor and attested by the Clerk is not valid unless duly authorized by the Board of Aldermen. Fulton v. City of Lockwood, 269 S.W.2d 1 (Mo.1954). … Nielson v. Dierking, 418 S.W.2d 146 (Mo.1967); Blackburn v. Gaydau, 241 Mo.App. 917 , 245 S.W.2d 161 (1951).

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. DUSTIN J. SNOW

437 S.W.3d 396 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 2014

State v. Brown, 660 S.W.2d 694, 698 (Mo. banc 1983). In addition, the plain and ordinary meaning of the word “punishment” in this phrase “includes ‘severe, rough, or disastrous treatment.’” State v. … See State v.

Estate of Pope v. Hook

670 S.W.2d 943 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1984

You know, they’ve got — I guess you — you know they both — brown hair and brown eyes.” He observed that, “Debbie and Wain could resemble each other too....” … In Brown v.

Henderson v. Heman Construction Co.

198 Mo. App. 423 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1918

That same rule has been announced by our Supreme Court in Ross v. Kansas City, St. J. & C. B. Ry. Co., 111 Mo. 18 , l. c. 25, 19 S. W. 541 . … It is true that it was not in a building, but as we have said in Austin v. Bluff City Shoe Co., 176 Mo. App. 546 , 158 S.

State v. Duckworth

787 S.W.2d 904 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1990

State v. Mischanko, 743 S.W.2d 867, 868 (Mo.App.1987). … Brown, 683 S.W.2d 301 (Mo.App.1984), is misplaced. See State v. Barnes, 736 S.W.2d 471, 473 (Mo.App.1984).

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. BENNY LYNN JOHNSON

Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 2023

Missouri courts have since cited to Brown without questioning its holding. See, e.g., State v. Childs, 684 S.W.2d 508, 511 (Mo. App. … Brown, 547 S.W.2d at 220. Mr. Johnson has supplied nothing further to make us question the holding in Brown. Given Mr.

Israel Ivan Ramirez v. Missouri Department of Social Services, Children's Division

501 S.W.3d 473 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 26, 2016

Jamison v. … (holding that because "ANP's, though sufficiently impacted by the Board's letter, are not subject to the authority of the Board . . .

Bridgeforth v. Proffitt

490 S.W.2d 416 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1973

State Board of Registration for Healing Arts, Mo.App., 397 S.W.2d 347, 354 (5); Scherffius v. … Brunk v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co., 334 Mo. 517, 533 , 66 S.W.2d 903, 910 (23); Hall v. Clark, Mo., 298 S.W.2d 344, 350 (13); Hood v. M. F. A. Mutual Ins. Co., Mo.App., 379 S.W.2d 806, 812 (9).

Smith v. Ozark Water Mills Co.

215 Mo. App. 129 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1922

W. 1137 ; Williams v. Storage Co., 214 S. W. 385 ; Woodson v. Street Railway Co., 224 Mo. 685 , 123 S. W. 820 ; Collett v. Kuhlman, 243 Mo. l. c. 591, 147 S. W. 965 ; Nivert v. Wabash R. R. … W. 946 ; Knapp v. Denham, 195 S. W. 1062 ; Albright v. Oil Co., 229 S. W. 829 .

State Ex Rel. Rundberg v. Kansas City

206 Mo. App. 17 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 1920

[Gracey v. St. Louis, 213 Mo. 384, 393 .] … In Gracey v. St.

Rapp v. City of Northwoods

769 S.W.2d 815 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 1989

opportunity, together with his witnesses, to be heard before the board of aldermen sitting as a board of impeachment. … Amaan v. City of Eureka, 615 S.W.2d 414, 416 [1] (Mo. banc 1981).

St. Louis Colonization Ass'n v. Hennessy

11 Mo. App. 555 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 1882

to do, the act is well done if done by a majority of the board. … Edgerly v. Emerson, 23 N. H. 555. See also Cram v. Bangor House, 12 Me. 359 . The judgment must be affirmed All the judges concur.