Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

0.67s

  • Hammack v. Hill and Behan

    212 Mo. App. 193 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1923

    [Huss v. Heydt Bakery Co., supra; Higgins v. Medart Patent Pulley Co., ___ Mo. App. ___, 240 S.W. 252 , l.c. 255.] … In Wagner v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Preston v. State

    325 S.W.3d 420 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 2010

    Section 494.465; State v. Anderson, 79 S.W.3d 420, 431 (Mo. banc 2002). … Two recent cases —State v. Sardeson, 174 S.W.3d 598, 601 (Mo.App.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Goodman v. City of Kahoka

    100 Mo. App. 278 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1903

    Habel v. Railroad, 140 Mo. 150 . … Bonine v. City of Richmond, 75 Mo. 437 ; Buckley v. Kansas City, 68 S. W. 689 . In Young v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Griswold v. Carthage

    18 Mo. App. 52 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 25, 1885

    Rollins v. Gross, 45 N. Y. 766 ; Roberts v. Fowler, 3 E. D. Smith 635; Brown v. Smith, 55 Iowa 32 ; Langan & Noble v. Sankey, 55 Iowa 52 ; Merchant v. The Ottumwa Water Power Co., 54 Iowa 455 . … Allen & Co. v. The Frumet Mining and Smelting Company, 73 Mo. 688 . In this case we follow the authorities above cited, and hold that the assignee cannot file such lien. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Hermann v. Miller

    44 Mo. App. 118 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 1891

    Guion’s Administrator, 16 Mo. 48 ; Gillett v. Camp, 27 Mo. 541 ; Otte v. Becton, 55 Mo. 99 . … In State to use v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Chadwick Consolidated School District v. Jackson

    229 Mo. App. 842 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 1935

    In fact no court is given statutory power to revise an estimate of a school board when within the legal limits allowed by law. In the case of Lyons v. School District, 278 S. … Ellis v. Elkin, 130 Mo. 90 , 30 S. W. 333 ; State ex rel. Public Service Co. v. Mulloy, 62 S. W. (2d) 730 , 333 Mo. 282 .]

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Davis

    90 Mo. App. 533 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 1901

    This point was determined by our Supreme Court in the case of Nelson v. Brown, 140 Mo. 580 . … Nelson v. Brown, supra; Pratt v. Conway, 148 Mo. 291 ; Bowen v. Beck, 94 N. Y. 86 . The ten-year and not the five-year statute of limitation applies in a case like this. Bowen v. Beck, 94 N. Y., supra.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Cottleville Community Fire Protection District v. Morak

    897 S.W.2d 647 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 1995

    On April 6, 1993, Mary Morak was elected a member of the board. She is married to a district firefighter. … City of Jackson v. Heritage Savings and Loan Association, 639 S.W.2d 142, 144 (Mo.App.1982).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. City of Sullivan

    520 S.W.2d 186 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1975

    Therefore, a contract even though signed by the Mayor and attested by the Clerk is not valid unless duly authorized by the Board of Aldermen. Fulton v. City of Lockwood, 269 S.W.2d 1 (Mo.1954). … Nielson v. Dierking, 418 S.W.2d 146 (Mo.1967); Blackburn v. Gaydau, 241 Mo.App. 917 , 245 S.W.2d 161 (1951).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Whatley v. Mueller

    288 S.W.2d 405 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1956

    Smith v. -Smith, Cal. App., 270 P.2d 613 . … Brown v. Board of Education, 294 Mo. 106 , 242 S.W. 85 , loc. cit. 87.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Schultz

    614 S.W.2d 11 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1981

    Coyne v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., 360 Mo. 991 , 232 S.W.2d 377 , [1] (1950). To be final and appealable, an order must contain all the essentials of a judgment. Brown Supply Co. v. J. C. … Schweitzer v. Greene, 438 S.W.2d 229, 231 (Mo. banc 1969); Brown Supply, supra.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Duckworth

    787 S.W.2d 904 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1990

    State v. Mischanko, 743 S.W.2d 867, 868 (Mo.App.1987). … Brown, 683 S.W.2d 301 (Mo.App.1984), is misplaced. See State v. Barnes, 736 S.W.2d 471, 473 (Mo.App.1984).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dolan v. Missouri Town Mutual Fire Insurance

    88 Mo. App. 666 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1900

    March v. Ins. Co., 186 Pa. St. 629; Brown v. Ins. Co., 172 Mass. 498 . 2. Plaintiff’s instructions, in effect, recognize this, but they submit the materiality of the risk to the jury. We think this was error. … March v. Ins. Co., and Brown v. Ins. Co., supra. 3. Further, or additional insurance, in any substantial sum, is plainly material. Aloe v. Ins. Co., 147 Mo. 561, 579 ; Hutchison v. Ins. Co., 21 Mo. 97 ; Barnard v. Ins.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Ozark Water Mills Co.

    215 Mo. App. 129 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1922

    W. 1137 ; Williams v. Storage Co., 214 S. W. 385 ; Woodson v. Street Railway Co., 224 Mo. 685 , 123 S. W. 820 ; Collett v. Kuhlman, 243 Mo. l. c. 591, 147 S. W. 965 ; Nivert v. Wabash R. R. … W. 946 ; Knapp v. Denham, 195 S. W. 1062 ; Albright v. Oil Co., 229 S. W. 829 .

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • State of Missouri v. Rodrick Fowler

    Missouri Court of Appeals · May 7, 2024

    State v. … Brown, 524 S.W.3d at 47-48; State v. Payne, 488 S.W.3d 161, 164 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016); see also section 556.046.1(2) (“[a]n offense is [] included when . . .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • St. Louis Colonization Ass'n v. Hennessy

    11 Mo. App. 555 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 1882

    to do, the act is well done if done by a majority of the board. … Edgerly v. Emerson, 23 N. H. 555. See also Cram v. Bangor House, 12 Me. 359 . The judgment must be affirmed All the judges concur.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Tuft v. City of St. Louis

    936 S.W.2d 113 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 1997

    We held that the final agreement between the school board and the superintendent was not a communication between the board and its attorneys and thus ruled the exception of § 610.021(1) inapplicable. 778 S.W.2d at 354 . … Lora v. Director of Revenue, 618 S.W.2d 630, 633 (Mo.1981); J.S. DeWeese Co. v. Hughes-Treitler Mfg. Corp., 881 S.W.2d 638, 643 (Mo.App.1994).

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Strange v. City of St. Joseph

    112 Mo. App. 629 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 8, 1905

    We held in Milledge v. Kansas City, 100 Mo. … [Reno v. St. Joseph, 169 Mo. 612 ; George v. Edelbrock, 97 Mo. App. 63 .] The specific objections made seem to be without merit.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Fetterhoff

    739 S.W.2d 573 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 1987

    In People v. Brown, a police officer stopped the defendant for a traffic violation. … People v. Brown, 236 CaLRptr. at 507-08. See also Luke v. State, 178 Ga.

    Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.