Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

2.74s

  • Sutherland v. Garetson-Greason Lumber Co.

    149 Mo. App. 338 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1910

    In Dickerson v. Jenkins, 128 S. … In Bowman v. American Car & Foundry Co., 125 S.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • O'Dell v. Scranton

    126 Mo. App. 19 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1907

    In Board of Commissioners v. Bradford, 72 Ind. 455 , a county board offered a reward for the apprehension and conviction of a' person charged with felony. … In Butler v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Stephen Burns, Inc. v. Trantham

    305 S.W.2d 66 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 3, 1957

    Mallory Motor Co. v. Overall, Mo.App., 279 S.W.2d 532 ; Vetter v. Browne, 231 Mo. App. 1147 , 85 S.W.2d 197 . The plaintiff also relies upon the case of Hickerson v. Con Frazier Buick Co., Mo.App., 264 S.W.2d 29 . … Browne, 231 Mo.App. 1147 , 85 S.W.2d 197 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • ROSE FORD v. SKAGGS CHIROPRACTIC, LLC

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 2020

    In Brown v. Brown, an appellant argued the trial court's award for payment of a guardian ad litem's fees was not supported by substantial evidence. 423 S.W.3d 784, 788 (Mo. banc 2014). … SCOTT, P.J. – CONCURS 6 The phrase "if the matter was previously presented to the trial court" was added at the end of Rule 78.07(b) in 2017, presumably in response to the decision in Brown v. Brown.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Barnett v. Pemiscot County Court

    111 Mo. App. 693 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1905

    They were simply recalling the permit which relator had obtained and held from the board and which he accepted upon condition that the board might, in their discretion, revoke.” People v. Wright, 3 Hun 310 ; People v. … Board of Excise v. Barrie, 34 N. Y. 657 .) The mode and manner in which this shall be done rests in the discretion of that body.” People v. Board of Com., 59 N. Y. 92 . In Voight v. Board of Excise, 59 N. J.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Manker v. Standard Oil Co.

    203 Mo. App. 404 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1920

    United Railways v. Reynolds, 213 S. W. 783 ; Vahldick v. Vahldick, 264 Mo. 529, 532 .] … [Simpson v. Witte Iron Works, 249 Mo. 376, 390 ; Demer v. Sutermeister, 266 Mo. 505, 520 .]

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sprenger v. Missouri Department of Public Safety

    248 S.W.3d 626 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 2008

    Section 36.020 denotes such a board as a personnel advisory board. … The board in this case has been denoted a Personnel Hearing Board by the board itself, but it was created under section 36.050 and serves the same function and follows the same rules as a personnel advisory board.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Defino v. Civic Center Corp.

    780 S.W.2d 665 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1989

    Sierra Club v. Butz, 349 F.Supp. 934 (N.D.Cal.1972); see also, Missouri v. NOW, 620 F.2d 1301 (8th Cir.1980) and cases cited therein. … Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • State v. Noble

    591 S.W.2d 201 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 1979

    State v. Hatten, 561 S.W.2d 706 (Mo.App.1978). Defendant’s next point is that the trial court erred in giving the jury a part of MAI-CR 4.50 (the Kerry Brown instruction). … Brown, 443 S.W.2d 805 (Mo. banc 1969); State v. Bolden, 494 S.W.2d 61 (Mo.1973); State v. Thompson, 465 S.W.2d 590 (Mo.1971).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Premier Panels, Inc. v. Swink

    400 S.W.2d 639 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 1966

    Pete Rhodes Supply Company v. Craine, Mo., 373 S.W.2d 38 . … Louis v. Flynn, 363 Mo. 1065 , 257 S.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Rafter

    62 Mo. App. 101 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 23, 1895

    It appeared from the certificate of the State Board of Pharmacy, which the defendant read in evidence, that he was a duly registered pharmacist. … In refusing the instruction asked, the circuit court-was governed, doubtless, by the cases of State v. Moore, 107 Mo. 78 , and State v. Searcy, 46 Mo.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Risby Pallet and Lumber Co.

    736 S.W.2d 575 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 1987

    The boards varied in length from 29 to 73 inches; a typical "armload" consisted of 4 boards 73 inches long. The weight of each bundle was about 45 pounds. … In Marie v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Butler v. M.W.S. Enterprises, Inc.

    199 S.W.3d 912 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 2006

    Brown v. MOCAP, Inc., 105 S.W.3d 854, 855 (Mo.App. E.D. 2003). In addition, this Court’s jurisdiction is derived from that of the Commission, and if it does not have jurisdiction, then neither do we. Id.; Stogsdill v. … Phillips v. Clean-Tech, 34 S.W.3d 854, 855 (Mo.App. E.D.2000). *914 The Division’s motion to dismiss is granted. The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. GLENN A. NORTON, and PATRICIA L. COHEN, JJ. Concur.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brooks v. Whaley

    613 S.W.2d 656 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1980

    Moretti, Inc. v. Boogers, 376 F.2d 27 (5th Cir. 1967); Rapp v. United States, 340 F.2d 635 (Ct.Cl.1964); Erickson v. City of Waltham, 2 Mass.App. 436 , 314 N.E.2d 139 (1974); and McElroy v. … Martin Nebraska Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Hill v. Travers

    602 S.W.2d 856 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1980

    In Schuman v. … Mitchell v. Hendricks, 431 F.Supp. 1295, 1301 (E.D.Pa.1977). Accord, Fayle v. Stapley, 607 F.2d 858, 862 (9th Cir. 1979); McDonald v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hulsey v. Hawthorne Restaurants, Inc.

    239 S.W.3d 156 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 2007

    Lange, board certified in orthopedic surgery, performed an examination of Ms. Hulsey at the request of the employer’s insurer. Dr. … Smith v. Climate Engineering at 431; Mueller v. Bay at 131. The Commission chose to believe Dr.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Clinton Area Vocational School v. Dandurand

    766 S.W.2d 169 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1989

    Government Employees Insurance Company, Inc. v. Clenny, 752 S.W.2d 66, 69 (Mo.App.1988); Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Litteer, 621 S.W.2d 376, 379 (Mo.App.1981). Cf. State ex rel. Ashcroft v. … Alvino v. Alvino, 659 S.W.2d 266, 270 (Mo.App.1983).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Stacy v. Harris

    321 S.W.3d 388 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 29, 2010

    Orion Sec., Inc. v. Board of Police Comm’rs of Kansas City, 90 S.W.3d 157, 163 (Mo.App. W.D.2002). … Kyle v. State Pers. Advisory Bd., 607 S.W.2d 848, 849 (Mo.App. W.D.1980). “Under this authority the Board adopted Rule 1 CSR 20-3.070[.]” Id.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In re Ashcraft

    193 Mo. App. 486 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 22, 1916

    [See Bine v. Jackson County, 181 S. W. 36 .] … [State v. Starchich, 184 Mo. 485 ; State v. Sexton, 141 Mo. App. 694 ; State v. Munch, 57 Mo. App. 207 .]

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Daniels

    861 S.W.2d 564 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 4, 1993

    The evidence at trial revealed that Illinois state trooper, Michael Terrell, began pursuing Daniels, the driver of a brown Cadillac, after he ran a flashing red stop light in Illinois. … This impropriety was immediately corrected by the Board of Jury Commissioners whereupon Judge Belt lifted the stay of jury trials.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.