Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

2.83s

  • State v. Tindle

    395 S.W.3d 56 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 2013

    State v. … State v. Shaffer, 251 S.W.3d 356, 358 (Mo.App. S.D.2008) (quoting Deck v. State, 68 S.W.3d 418, 427 (Mo. banc 2002)).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brod v. Evans

    738 S.W.2d 902 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 1987

    Naugher v. Mallory, 631 S.W. 2d 370, 374 (Mo.App.1982). … The court concluded that the board had not abused its discretion and that the judgment of the board so exercised could not be controlled or reviewed in a mandamus proceeding. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Dunker v. Stiefel

    57 Mo. App. 379 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1894

    Neenan *384 v. Smith, 50 Mo. 531 ; City to use v. Clemens, 49 Mo. 552 ; Weber v. Schergens, 59 Mo. 389 . … See, also, Powell v. City of St. Joseph, 31 Mo. 347 ; Farrar v. City of St. Louis, 80 Mo. 379 . The result is, the judgment herein is affirmed. All concur.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Matthews v. Ledbetter

    573 S.W.2d 725 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 1978

    Trotter v. Sirinek, 515 S.W.2d 67 [1] (Mo.App.1974). Plaintiff would restrict the village board’s authority to § 80.420, which empowers it to “instantly remove” him for “any wanton neglect of duty.” … Both parties cite Karzin v. Collett, 562 S.W.2d 397 (Mo.App.1978).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Globe Furniture Co. v. District 7, Township 62, Range 31

    51 Mo. App. 549 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1892

    It is said in Heidelberg v. St. … Sutherland on Statutory Construction, sec. 447; Sedgwick on Construction of Statutes [2 Ed.] 316, et seq.; Cape Girardeau v. Riley, 52 Mo. 424 ; West v. Ross, 53 Mo. 350 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cole v. Waters

    164 Mo. App. 567 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 6, 1912

    [McKee v. Downing, 224 Mo. 115 , 124 S. W. 7 ; Norvell v. Cooper, 155 Mo. App. 445 , 134 S. W. 1095 .] … in taking care of, boarding and washing for him, if there was a contract between him and her that he should do so.”

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Seaboard National Bank v. Woesten

    68 Mo. App. 137 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1896

    Verdin v. City of St. Louis, 131 Mo. 26 . … Hodges v. Black, 8 Mo. App. 389 ; Bayha v. Taylor, 36 Mo. App. 427 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. 401 North Lindbergh Associates v. Ciarleglio

    807 S.W.2d 100 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1990

    Schroeder v. Horack, 592 S.W.2d 742, 744 (Mo. banc 1979); Bess v. Bess, 750 S.W.2d 642, 643 (Mo.App.1988). … State v. Conz, 756 S.W.2d 543, 546 (Mo.App.1988). Section 138.100.2, RSMo 1986, does not contain consequences for failure of the board to hold hearings by the last Saturday in July.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Miller

    774 S.W.2d 578 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 15, 1989

    State v. Winkelmann, 761 S.W.2d 702, 707 (Mo.App.1988); State v. Newlon, 627 S.W.2d 606, 614 (Mo. banc 1982). … These instructions, which must be read together, State v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Knight v. Orchard

    92 Mo. App. 466 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 1902

    In Gedge v. … Commonwealth v. Contner, 18 Pa. St. l. c. 447; Cross v. Tome, 14 Md. 247 ; McFarlane v. Williams, 107 Ill. 33 ; 2 Bl. Com. 41.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Citizens for Rural Preservation, Inc. v. Robinett

    648 S.W.2d 117 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 1983

    NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 988 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965). … Century State Bank v. State Banking Board, 523 S.W.2d 856 (Mo.App.1975). Our scope of review is limited to a determination of whether the findings are supported by competent and substantial evidence.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Armstrong v. School District

    19 Mo. App. 462 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1885

    of directors, in dismissing him. ” This case was tried before the publication of the opinion, delivered by Martin, C., in Arnold v. … They were throughout, on defendant’s behalf, constructed on a misconception of the issues and the power of the board of directors. On a re-trial, with the aid of the opinion in Arnold v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Pioneer Life Insurance

    181 Mo. App. 353 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1914

    [Finger v. Brewing Co., 13 Mo. App. 310 .] … Thus in Bennett v. St. Louis Car Roofing Co., 23 Mo.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • House v. Clarke

    171 Mo. App. 242 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 5, 1913

    There are instances in which the Supreme Court has recognized its jurisdiction in actions of this character, as in the cases of Keith v. Browning, 139 Mo. 190, 193 , 40 S. W. 764 ; Sturgeon v. … W. 630 ; and Arnett v. Williams, 226 Mo. 109 , 125 S. W. 1154 . This cause is, therefore, transferred to the Supreme Court. All concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Rafter

    62 Mo. App. 101 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 23, 1895

    It appeared from the certificate of the State Board of Pharmacy, which the defendant read in evidence, that he was a duly registered pharmacist. … In refusing the instruction asked, the circuit court-was governed, doubtless, by the cases of State v. Moore, 107 Mo. 78 , and State v. Searcy, 46 Mo.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Johnson-Brinkman Commission Co. v. Wabash Railroad

    64 Mo. App. 590 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 20, 1896

    Tiedeman on Sales, sec. 47; Acebel v. Lacy, 10 Bing. 376; Kountze v. Kirkpatrick, 72 Pa. St. 376. … Everett v. Railroad, 59 Iowa, 243 . In Acebelv.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • R. A. Vorhof Construction Co. v. Black Jack Fire Protection District

    454 S.W.2d 588 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 1970

    Louis County v. Board of Education of Pattonville Cons. School Dist. R-3, Mo.App., 315 S.W.2d 873, 877 . … Desloge v. St. Louis County, Mo., 431 S.W.2d 126, 131 [3-6]; Appelbaum v. St. Louis County, Mo., 451 S.W.2d 107 (Feb. 9, 1970). Here, we must defer to the conclusion of the board of directors of the fire district.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Skinker v. Heman

    64 Mo. App. 441 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 1896

    City, 47 Mo. 474 ; Fowler v. City, 37 Mo. 228 ; Lockwood v. City, 24 Mo. 20 ; Johnson v. Duer, 115 Mo. 366 ; State ex rel. v. Philips, 97 Mo. 331 ; Ritterskamp v. Stifel, 59 Mo. App. 510 . … Corrigan v. Gage, 68 Mo. 541 ; Halpin v. Campbell, 71 Mo. 493 ; City v. Weber, 44 Mo. 547 ; Kelly v. Meeks, 87 Mo. 396 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State of Missouri v. Todd R. Shepard

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 2023

    State v. … See id.; see also, e.g., State v. Brown, 596 S.W.3d 193, 208-09 (Mo. App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Bibbs

    634 S.W.2d 499 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1982

    Police Officer Brown was in the store at the time and came out to investigate. He saw a man standing next to the car with a small caliber pistol. … State v. Hurst, 612 S.W.2d 846, 853 (Mo.App.1981).

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.