Case law

City of Craig v. Smith

31 Mo. App. 286 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 23, 1888

And it is provided by section 4956, Revised Statutes, that: “When the board of aldermen shall fix the rate of taxation, the clerk of the board shall charge the collector with the full amount of such taxes levied and to be … This view is sustained by the Supreme Court in analogous cases: State ex rel. v. Spencer, 49 Mo. 342 ; State ex rel. v. Maguire, 52 Mo. 420 .

Emergency Patient Services, Inc. v. Crisp

602 S.W.2d 26 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1980

Hedden Co. v. Dozier, 133 A. 857, 859 (N.J.Eq.1926); Schmidt v. Paul, 105 A.2d 118, 121 (Pa. 1954); and 18 C.J.S. Corporations § 19, p. 612. … See Ramacciotti v. Joe Simpkins, Inc., 427 S.W.2d 425, 431 (Mo.1968). As stated in Jorndt v.

Mullin v. Silvercreek Condominium, Owner's Ass'n

195 S.W.3d 484 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 2006

Homes Ass’n v. Country Club Christian Church, 118 S.W.3d 185 , 189 (Mo.App. W.D.2003); Mackey v. Griggs, 61 S.W.3d 312, 315 (Mo.App. S.D.2001). *490 Restrictive covenants are not favorites of Missouri law. Blevins v. … (citing Shepherd v. State, 427 S.W.2d 382, 386-87 (Mo.1968)).

State v. Keely

791 S.W.2d 864 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 22, 1990

State v. Brass, supra. We have previously held arguments such as this to be proper. In State v. … For support we cited the Missouri Supreme Court case of State v. Brown, 480 S.W.2d 839 (Mo.1972).

Bennett Ex Rel. Bennett v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

223 Mo. App. 28 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 24, 1928

[See, also, Strange v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co., 61 Mo. App. 586 ; Deming v. C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 80 Mo. App. 152 ; Snyder v. Wabash Ry. Co., 85 Mo. App. 495 .] Bessie Rawlings v. Wabash Ry. Co., 97 Mo. App. 511 , 71 S. … [Crutcher v. Railroad, 132 Mo. App. 311 , 111 S. W. 891 ; Rawlings v. Railroad, 97 Mo. App. 515 , 71 S. W. 534 .]

Two Pershing Square, L.P. v. Boley

981 S.W.2d 635 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 1998

V, § 3; Alumax Foils, Inc. v. City of St. Louis, 939 S.W.2d 907, 910 (Mo. banc 1997). … The proper procedure for appealing from the decision of the board of equalization is determined by the nature of the dispute as set out in § 138.430. St. Peters Community Hosp. Inc. v.

State ex rel. Rybolt v. Easley

600 S.W.2d 601 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 5, 1980

Appellant argues the court erred in concluding an A-2 district was residential when in fact it is agricultural, and cites for the court the case of County of Ada, Board of County Com’rs v. … City of Ladue, supra, and Allen v. Coffel, supra. As has been pointed out, appellants cite for the court the case of County of Ada, Board of County Com’rs v.

Hunter Avenue Property, L.P. v. Union Electric Co.

895 S.W.2d 146 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 1995

The court further held, relying on School District of Riverview Gardens v. St. Louis County, 816 S.W.2d 219 (Mo. banc 1991) and O’Reilly v. … See e.g., Schmoll v. Housing Authority of St. Louis, 321 S.W.2d 494, 498 (Mo.1959). They also cite Hatfield v.

Powell v. Powell

23 Mo. App. 365 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1886

Copp v. St. Louis Co., 34 Mo. 388 . Wagner, J., in commenting on this same provision of the statute, in Merritt v. … If the administrator was to furnish the hands, the presumption is that he should board them, and when he left them for the widow to board the law implies that she should be compensated therefor. IY.

State of Missouri ex rel. Arnie C. Dienoff v. Patricia Galkowski, St. Charles County Ambulance District, and Rich A. Chrismer and St. Charles County, Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 27, 2014

Reed v. … Wright-Jones v.

Jennings v. Kansas City

105 Mo. App. 677 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 1904

the north end of said board suddenly and unexpectedly .gave way and went down beneath her feet and the south end flew up, causing plaintiff’s feet to go down through the hole in the said sidewalk made by said board giving … Cohn v. Kansas City, supra; Phelps v. Salisbury, 161 Mo. 1 . Affirmed. All concur.

Filger v. Public Water Supply District No. 1, of Clay County

346 S.W.2d 567 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1961

In Reid Development Corp. v. … Rutan Estates, Inc. v.

State ex rel. Nelson v. City of Berkeley

991 S.W.2d 747 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 18, 1999

By vote of the Board of Trustees of the Police and Firemen’s Retirement Fund of the City of Berkeley (“the Board”), Relator, a commissioned officer of the City of Berkeley Police Department, as well as a member of the Board … Associated Holding Co. v. City of St. Joseph, 237 Mo.App. 399 , 169 S.W.2d 419, 420 (W.D.1943).

State v. Daniels

861 S.W.2d 564 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 4, 1993

The evidence at trial revealed that Illinois state trooper, Michael Terrell, began pursuing Daniels, the driver of a brown Cadillac, after he ran a flashing red stop light in Illinois. … This impropriety was immediately corrected by the Board of Jury Commissioners whereupon Judge Belt lifted the stay of jury trials.

Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Kenneth Moore, and Lashun Givands

Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 2023

Bennett v. Taylor, 615 S.W.3d 96, 99 (Mo. App. E.D. 2020) (quoting Scott v. King, 510 S.W.3d 887, 892 (Mo. App. E.D. 2017)). … Brown v. Brown, 645 S.W.3d 75, 84 (Mo. App. W.D. 2022) (internal quotation omitted).

Ebert v. A. J. Kasper Co.

228 Mo. App. 589 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1934

*Page 593 [Martin v. Kline Apparel Co., 249 S.W. 965 ; Birdsong v. Jones, 30 S.W.2d 1094 .] Moreover, one of the defenses was that a toe board was maintained in each floor. … [Bachman v. Q.O. K.C.R.R. Co., 274 S.W. 764 , 767.]

State v. Gibson

540 S.W.2d 952 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 1976

State v. Raspberry, 452 S.W.2d 169, 172 [1] (Mo.1970); State v. Jackson, 511 S.W.2d 771, 775 [7] (Mo.1974); State v. Brown, 528 S.W.2d 503, 505 [4, 5] (Mo.App.1975). … You do not have to go through a customs board when you cross the Lewis-Clark Bridge. I came over to Missouri. It says ‘Welcome to Missouri.’ ” Of course the fact that Mr.

Grandview Bank & Trust Co. v. State Tax Commission

617 S.W.2d 109 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 19, 1981

V, § 3. … V, § 3.

State v. Kelly

851 S.W.2d 693 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 1993

For his defense, defendant testified that he was driving a friend’s brown Chevrolet at the time he was stopped and knew nothing of a white Oldsmobile. … This impropriety was immediately corrected by the Board of Jury Commissioners whereupon Judge Belt lifted the stay of jury trials. In State v. Landers, 841 S.W.2d 791 (Mo.

Carter v. Farmers Bank of Chariton Co.

232 Mo. App. 705 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 4, 1938

Revised Statutes 1929, provides that "no bills payable shall be made . . . except with the consent of the board of directors." In the case of Union National Bank of Kansas City v. … [Lyons case, supra: Ferrell v. Milford State Bank et al., 19 S.W.2d 312 .]