Case law

Cook v. Haney

804 S.W.2d 435 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1991

Estate of Moehlenpah, 763 S.W.2d 249, 255 (Mo.App.1988); Brown v. Storz, 710 S.W.2d 402, 405 (Mo.App.1986); State ex rel. Pope v. Lisle, 469 S.W.2d 841 (Mo.App.1971). … Moehlenpah, supra, at 265 ; Brown v. Storz, supra, at 405 .

Eversole v. Wood

754 S.W.2d 27 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 19, 1988

See Mickels v. Henderson, 642 S.W.2d 661, 663 (Mo.App.1982). Moreover, both agree the effective denial of the eighteen (18) voters here was an “irregularity” which would invalidate the April 5 election. … Ass’n. v. Director of Revenue, State of Mo., 742 S.W.2d 141, 143 (Mo.1987).

Reber v. Tower

11 Mo. App. 199 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1881

Wilbur v. Johnson, 58 Mo. 600 ; St. Louis R. Co. v. Silver, 56 Mo. 265 ; King v. Mittalberger, 50 Mo. 182 ; Meyer v. Railroad Co., 43 Mo. 523 ; Smith v. Hutchings, 30 Mo. 380 ; The State v. Hughes, 24 Mo. 147 ; Walsh v. … ” and the plaintiff answered : “ No ; but two days afterward a fireman by the name of Brown showed me some.” And in answer to another question he stated that this was the same Brown who had been on the witness-stand.

Simmons v. Megerman

742 S.W.2d 202 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 11, 1987

Wisdom v. Wisdom, 689 S.W.2d 82, 87 (Mo.App.1985). … Brown v. Brown, 670 S.W.2d 167, 170 (Mo.App. 1984). From the summary of facts in this case, it is apparent that the trial court was attempting to impose a judgment upon petitioner for indirect civil contempt.

Heaton v. Kansas City, Pittsburg & Gulf Railroad

65 Mo. App. 479 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 1896

Nelson v. Railroad, 68 Mo. 593 . It has been said also that it would be negligence per se for a person to board a train moving at the rate of eight miles per hour. Murphy v. Railroad, 43 Mo. App. 342 . … Doss v. Railroad, 59 Mo. 27 ; Straus v. Railroad, 75 Mo. 190 .

Sandra Ferkel v. Timothy Ferkel

Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 2014

Heck v. Heck, 318 S.W.3d 760, 767 (Mo. App. W.D. 2010) (quotation omitted). “An issue that was never presented to or decided by the trial court is not preserved for appellate review.” Brown v. … Brown, 423 S.W.3d 784, 788 (Mo. banc 2014) (quotation omitted).

State Committee for Marital & Family Therapists v. Haynes

395 S.W.3d 67 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 2013

Exchange v. Horner, 368 S.W.3d 214, 216 (Mo.App. W.D.2012). … See Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corp. v.

Tillis v. City of St. Louis

472 S.W.3d 614 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 2015

State v. Ladner

613 S.W.2d 951 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1981

State v. Kesterson, 403 S.W.2d 606, 609-611 (Mo.1966); State v. Hasler, supra 449 S.W.2d at 885 ; see also, State v. DiLiberto, 537 S.W.2d 671, 673 (Mo.App.1976). … Chapter 321, regulating fire protection districts, provides in § 321.190 RSMo 1969 that board members, like defendant here, shall receive a fee for attending board meetings and also provides that board members shall be reimbursed

Dahman v. City of Ballwin

483 S.W.2d 605 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 1972

Sims v. … Sims v.

Moore by and Through Moore v. Appleton City R-Ii School Dist.

232 S.W.3d 642 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 2007

(“Board”) meeting. … Co. of America v. Graham, 984 S.W.2d 501, 506 (Mo. banc 1999).

Suppes v. Curators of the University of Missouri

529 S.W.3d 825 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 2017

Killingsworth v. George, 168 S.W.3d 621, 625 (Mo. App. E.D. 2005). In Byrd v. … The President’s decision may then be appealed to the Board of Curators of the University, where the parties have the right of appearance before a committee of the Board.

Reynolds Ex Rel. Reynolds v. National Casualty Co.

231 Mo. App. 453 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 1937

[Schmohl v. Travelers’ Ins. Co. (Mo. App.), 189 S. W. 597 , affirmed (Mo. Sup.), 197 S. W. 60 ; State ex rel. v. Ellison, 266 Mo. 580 .] In Stewart v. North American Acc. Ins. Co., 33 S. … In the above case the insured was riding upon the running board.

State v. Gibson

540 S.W.2d 952 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 1976

State v. Raspberry, 452 S.W.2d 169, 172 [1] (Mo.1970); State v. Jackson, 511 S.W.2d 771, 775 [7] (Mo.1974); State v. Brown, 528 S.W.2d 503, 505 [4, 5] (Mo.App.1975). … You do not have to go through a customs board when you cross the Lewis-Clark Bridge. I came over to Missouri. It says ‘Welcome to Missouri.’ ” Of course the fact that Mr.

Gibson v. Adams

946 S.W.2d 796 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1997

Gieselmann v. Stegeman, 443 S.W.2d 127 (Mo.1969). Adams and Murphy increased their salaries while decreasing Gibson’s, an action done without board or shareholder approval. … Haugland v. Parsons, 863 S.W.2d 609, 610 (Mo.App. E.D.1992). Tortious interference with a contract is one such independent tort. Hanrahan v. Nashua Corp., 752 S.W.2d 878 (Mo.App.1988); Honigmann v.

State v. Kelly

851 S.W.2d 693 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 1993

For his defense, defendant testified that he was driving a friend’s brown Chevrolet at the time he was stopped and knew nothing of a white Oldsmobile. … This impropriety was immediately corrected by the Board of Jury Commissioners whereupon Judge Belt lifted the stay of jury trials. In State v. Landers, 841 S.W.2d 791 (Mo.

Glanville v. Hickory County Reorganized School District No. I

637 S.W.2d 328 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 1982

A school board’s right not to rehire a teacher cannot be based on grounds that are violative of a teacher’s constitutional right of free speech. Williams v. … The defendants, relying on Austin v.

State Ex Rel. Girard v. Percich

557 S.W.2d 25 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 1977

McMullin v. Sulgrove, 459 S.W.2d 383 (Mo.banc 1970); State v. Koon, supra; State ex rel. Wendt v. Journey, supra. … in Curtis v.

Dempsey v. BOYS'CLUB OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS, INC.

558 S.W.2d 262 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 1977

Kelly and Janice Lee Kelly, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOYS' CLUB OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS, INC., a corporation, the Board of Adjustment of the City of St. Louis and Individual Members Martin Beffa, Charles K. … Co. v. City of New York, 50 A.D.2d 265 , 377 N.Y.S.2d 20, 28 (1975). [5] Maher v. City of New Orleans, supra, 516 F.2d l. c. 1065. [6] See First Presbyterian Church of York v.

State ex rel. School District No. 18 v. Sexton

151 Mo. App. 517 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1910

Because of this omission the Supreme Court in School District v. Hodgin, 180 Mo. l. c. 79, and the St. Louis Court of Appeals in School District v. Pace, 113 Mo. … In the late case of State ex rel. v.